Re: Engagement Agreement
Pursuant to New York Law, this letter confirms the terms under which the Marshall Law Group (“we”) will undertake to counsel and represent you and/or your company in connection with trademark searching, clearance advice, trademark application filings with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), application and registration maintenance, trademark oppositions, settlement negotiations and copyright filings (the “Scope of Services”). Unless the Marshall Law Group and you mutually agree otherwise, such as by electing to purchase a package for limited scope representation the above description fully defines the scope of our representation, and we have not undertaken to represent you beyond the scope of that description or your separately managed parents, subsidiaries or affiliates. If in the future, you wish us to represent you in any other manner, such as representation that goes beyond the limited scope of a package that should be the subject of additional discussions and an additional engagement letter.
Fees. Prior to our beginning work, you will compensate us for our services by paying the invoice (including any fees owed to the USPTO). If additional services need to be rendered, outside the limited scope of representation, we shall either indicate a flat fee rate or in other cases, a reasonable attorney fee of $375-$450 per hour, will be charged. As we do not charge our clients retainer fees, any additional work you decide we will undertake on your behalf will either be billed at a flat-fee or we will ask that pre-payment is made towards an estimated number of hours to perform such work. None of our costs include USPTO filing fees. USPTO fees are always subject to change. We reserve the right to postpone or defer providing additional services, to discontinue our representation, and/or to add finance charges when accounts contain billed amounts for which payment is past due. We do not typically issue refunds. If for some reason a refund is due we retain a $200 processing fee. For filings with fixed deadlines, we require all necessary instructions, specimens, documents, and fee payments by the deadline stated in our communication in order to ensure timely preparation. If materials are provided after that deadline, a $200 rush surcharge will apply for us to complete the filing on time.
Limitation of Search. Please note the preliminary search performed by the Marshall Law Group is not definitive. For a more definitive search, a private search company such as CT CORSEARCH would need to be hired to perform a more thorough, comprehensive search. Although a mark may appear free from encumbrance and available for registration and use, a prior undisclosed use of the identical or a similar mark is possible. Additionally, although we may perform a common law search of internet references, depending upon your chosen package, these searches do not always capture the content necessary to determine if the site displays an 1 identical or similar mark. It is, in effect, impossible to be certain. In addition, we cannot guarantee that every owner of a reference located by the search would agree with our analysis, nor can we predict, with any degree of certainty, the outcome of a contested proceeding that might turn up facts unknown to us. While we believe that the search results are generally reliable, it is possible that we may have overlooked a pertinent reference or that an existing application was not publicly available at the time the search was made. Finally, a reference may be considered to be a famous mark despite our unfamiliarity with it and, therefore, it may be protected against the blurring of its distinctiveness which is a form of dilution. Please also be aware that a party can file an application in another country and can claim the priority of that filing date in a U.S. application, or in a Madrid Protocol extension to the U.S., during the 6 months after that filing date. Moreover, this may not be publicly known for 3 or more additional months because of normal procedures under the Protocol and the normal lag time in including information in public searchable databases.
Common law rights arise from actual use of a mark and may allow the common law user to successfully challenge a registration or application.Please note that with regard to copyright, it is not possible to perform a comprehensive search of existing copyrights.
Limitation of Representation: As a small firm, if a matter necessitates filing an opposition or cancellation action, we can make the initial filing. However, if an Answer is filed by the opposite party, we do not have the bandwidth to prosecute a matter through an entire Trademark and Trial Appeal Board litigation. We have litigation counsel that we trust and recommend when and if necessary. By signing below you are acknowledging your understanding of this and consent to our being removed as counsel if a matter proceeds as noted above.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------