BEREC Stakeholder Forum-Satisfaction Survey

SATISFACTION SURVEY

We were happy to have you at the BEREC Stakeholder Forum on 28 October 2021!

We are looking forward to meeting you again in 2022. Here is a kind request to spend a few minutes sharing your opinion on the event and its organization.

ABOUT YOU AND YOUR ORGANISATION

Q: In which capacity did you participate?

Speaker / BEREC WG Co-chairOn-site participantOnline participant

ABOUT THE ON-SITE MEETING

Q: Please rate your overall satisfaction with the event on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5	N.A.
Global content of the sessions in the conference
Interactivity of the sessions
Overall duration of the event

The Conference

Q: Satisfaction with the chairs, panellists & moderators based on the following scale: 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: agree; 4: strongly agree.

	1	2	3	4
The panellists and chairs were able to convey clear messages about the topic
The panellists and chairs were well prepared for the session
The panellists and chairs answered questions in a complete manner
The moderator encouraged active participation

The Meet&Greet

Did you attended any of the Meet&Greet?

YesNo

Q: Satisfaction with the chairs based on the following scale: 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: agree; 4: strongly agree.

	1	2	3	4
The chairs were able to convey clear messages about the topic
The chairs were well prepared for the session
The chairs answered questions in a complete manner
Interactivity of the sessions
Duration of the sessions

1. End Users WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

2. Fixed Network Evolution WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

3. Market and Economic Analysis WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

4. Open Internet WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

5. Planning and Future Trends WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

6. Regulatory Frameworks WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

7. Remedies WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

8. Roaming WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

9. Statistics and Indicators WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

10. Wireless Network Evolution WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

11. Ad-hoc 5G Cybersecurity WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

12. Ad-hoc Sustainability WG: Please rate your satisfaction on the scale of 1-5: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 5 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	5
Content
Usefulness
Interaction

Please share your impressions from the Meet&Greet (discussed content, do you find it useful, etc.):

Please assess the practicalities of the Meet&Greet (space, dedicated time, etc.):

Would you like to participate in similar session next time?

YesNo

Please provide us with your feedback on the Meet&Greet:

ABOUT THE ON-SITE ORGANISATION ARRANGEMENTS

Q: Please rate your overall satisfaction with the facilities and organisation based on the following scale: 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: agree; 4: strongly agree.

	1	2	3	4	N.A.
The meeting rooms and other facilities provided a good setting for this conference
The tools and equipment during the different sessions worked well
The hostesses and other staff dealing with the organisation were helpful and knowledgeable
The registration process was easy, clear and quick
Practical arrangements were clear and communicated on time
There were no spamming with information on the event
The Networking reception allowed good networking with the participants
The refreshments and food provided were of good quality

ABOUT THE ONLINE MEETING

Q: Please rate your overall satisfaction with the event on the scale of 1-4: 1 being the lowest (Not satisfied); 4 being the highest (Extremely satisfied)

	1	2	3	4	N.A.
Quality of presentations
Interactivity of the sessions
Global content of sessions
Virtual format of the event
A/V quality

Q: Satisfaction with the trainers/speaker & moderator based on the following scale: 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: agree; 4: strongly agree.

	1	2	3	4	N.A.
The speakers were able to convey clear messages about the topic
The speakers were well prepared for the session
The speakers answered questions in a complete manner
The moderator encouraged active participation

ABOUT THE ONLINE ORGANISATION ARRANGEMENTS

Q: Please rate your overall satisfaction with the facilities and organisation based on the following scale: 1: strongly disagree; 2: disagree; 3: agree; 4: strongly agree.

	1	2	3	4	N.A.
The platform worked well during the different sessions
The live caption service was of good quality
The support staff dealing with the organisation were helpful and knowledgeable
The registration process was easy, clear and quick
Practical arrangements were clear and communicated on time
There were no spamming with information on the event
The on-line platform was user-friendly

Please indicate any specific comments or suggestions that you can think can improve the next edition (topics, format ...)

Thank you for taking the time to participate in the evaluation of this meeting!