We hereby petition the Kentucky State Board of Hairdressers and Cosmetologists (State Board) to implement changes in the PSI (Universal Licensing for Beauty Professionals) exams. Our proposal seeks to enhance the accessibility and fairness of the theory portion of the exams by allowing it to be administered in multiple languages. Additionally, we urge the removal of the limit on the number of examination attempts within the existing 5-year time frame. We propose maintaining the requirement of 80 hours of brushup for every three examination failures.
Currently, the State Board only permits the written portion of the exams for Cosmetologists, Nail Technicians, Estheticians, and instructors to be conducted in English. However, it is worth noting that PSI already offers written examination versions in various languages. Several states have already implemented policies allowing students to take their exams in their native language. The decision of whether to allow exams in multiple languages lies within the jurisdiction of each state's licensing body.
FACT: Approximately 73% of states administering PSI theory examinations provide translated exams in languages other than English. Examples of states with such provisions include California, South Dakota, Alaska, and Arizona (offering Spanish and Vietnamese exams).
Forcing individuals to take the written examination in a language that is not their native language creates unnecessary difficulties. Instead of allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of safety and sanitation, as well as their understanding of salon products and services, they struggle with translation. This not only consumes additional time but also causes students to rush through the exam, often resulting in guesses toward the end. Consequently, students are compelled to take the exam multiple times, incurring additional expenses. In the worst-case scenario, time constraints may lead to expiration of the 5-year period, rendering their hours invalid. Allowing ESL students to take the written exam in their native language does not compromise the test's integrity; it simply accommodates their needs.
Limiting access to licensure for ESL students has economic repercussions, as it hinders their ability to earn a living and contribute to society. Furthermore, it affects salons and consumers, as a smaller number of licensed professionals in the state leads to increased service costs.
If the Board's concern revolves around an examinee's ability to communicate with the public, it should be sufficient to evaluate their proficiency through the practical exam, which is conducted in English. Embracing diversity and fostering inclusion enhances the community, strengthens the economy, and provides consumers with more choices and better value. Let Kentucky lead the way in making the licensing process easier for our immigrant population.
We respectfully request that the Kentucky State Board allows students to take their written examination in their native language, while also removing the limit on the number of examination attempts. Additionally, we propose that graduates be allowed to continue taking 80 hours of brushup after every three examination attempts. These changes will create a more inclusive and equitable environment for aspiring beauty professionals.