• Lakeshore Transportation Studies

  • The City of Mississauga is planning a new Active Transportation Bridge over the Credit River!

    In June of 2019, the City of Mississauga completed the Lakeshore Connecting Communities Transportation Master Plan (TMP), which guided the planning of Lakeshore Road. The TMP recommended a new Active Transportation (AT) Bridge (pedestrians and cyclists only) over the Credit River to accommodate future projected travel demand in the Study Area.

    A Schedule B Class Environmental Assessment (EA) was conducted for the Active Transportation Bridge and will conclude by Spring 2022. The preferred EA alternative for the AT Bridge is a signature bridge, which provides the opportunity for community input.​

    We are seeking input on design features for the look and feel of the bridge, how it will function and elements for creating a good experience. This is important input that will be used to develop a preliminary design for the bridge.

    Following EA approval, the Active Transportation Bridge will move into detailed design, anticipated for later this year.

  • Overview

    The new bridge will connect the cycling path on Mississauga Rd on the south side of Credit river to the multi-use path on the north side of the river.

  • Aerial photograph showing elements of new bridge and associated features.

  • View from south side of Credit River.

  • View from north side of Credit River.

  • Existing conditions over at the Credit River in the Port Credit area of Mississauga. The photo is taken from the south side of the river and shows the existing rail bridge.
  • Existing conditions over at the Credit River in the Port Credit area of Mississauga. The photo is taken from the north side of the river and shows a multi-use path, the existing rail bridge, the Royal Canadian Legion, and the Mississauga Canoe Club.

  • Design Parameters

    Key Features

    • Bridge length: 66m
    • Vertical clearance from water: 5.5m (+/- 1.25m)
    • Minimium cycling width: 1.5m per direction
    • Minimium pedestrian width: 1.5m

    Safety Considerations

    All safety and accessibility standards will meet code requirements, including:

    • Rail height
    • Grading
    • Tactile surfaces

    Sustainable Design

    Sustainable design practices will be considered as much as possible during detailed design

  • The following cross section shows the minimum widths for walking and cycling paths on the active transportation bridge. This configuration will continue to be refined through public and stakeholder feedback.​

  • Image field 15

  • Bridge Aesthetics - Form & Image

    Two bridge types are being considered for the Project: Arch and Truss. Preliminary concept sketches have been developed for each bridge type. Please review the sketches below and share your feedback on which bridge type you prefer.​

  • Examples of arch bridges

  • Image field 75
  • Image field 76

  • Examples of truss bridges

  • Image field 77
  • Image field 78

  • Concept #1: Arch Bridge

  • A conceptual rendering that shows what an arch bridge design for the active transportation bridge over the Credit River could look like.
  • Image field 42

  • Concept #2: Truss Bridge

  • A conceptual rendering that shows what a truss bridge design for the active transportation bridge over the Credit River could look like.
  • A conceptual rendering that shows how cyclists and pedestrians could use a truss bridge over the Credit River.

  • Bridge Aesthetics - Lighting

    How should the bridge be illuminated? Accent lighting may be used to highlight key features of the bridge, and lighting can also be concealed. The photos below provide examples of each.

  • Example of Concealed Lighting

  • Example of Accent Lighting

  • The lighting is installed underneath the handrails, illuminating the path.
  • The lighting is installed on an overhead arch, illuminating the entire bridge.

  • Bridge Function - Accomodating Different Users

    How should different users be accommodated on the bridge? The project team is exploring different ways to ensure safety and comfort for all users as shown in the pictures below.

  • Example 1: Separated cyclist and pedestrian areas with ​lane markings

  • Example 2: Central cyclist area with pedestrian viewing areas on each side

  • Pedestrian and bicycle lane markings on an active transportation bridge. The pedestrian walkway is marked on the left, separated from the cycling lane by a solid white line. Both lanes are painted with pedestrian and bicycle icons, respectively, and directional arrows.
  • Pedestrian and bicycle lane markings on an active transportation bridge. Pedestrian walkways are on the left and right side of the bridge and are painted green. Cycling lanes are in the centre of the bridge and are coloured red, with traffic directions separated by a white dashed line.

  • Example 3: Shared cyclist and pedestrian area on the bridge, with cyclists encouraged to slow down​

  • Shared pedestrian and bicycle path on an active transportation bridge. There are no markings on the bridge.

  • Bridge Experience

    What elements can create a good experience for all bridge users? The project team is looking at different features such as seating areas and interpretive elements (such as information about local history, vegetation and/or wildlife) to understand what should be incorporated in the preliminary bridge design. Public art by local and/or indigenous artists may also be considered.​

  • Examples of seating areas

  • Examples of interpretive elements

  • Final Thoughts

  • Should be Empty: