Call for papers
International Scientific Conference: Cancer, Work
& Employment
21^st-22^nd November 2022, Paris

Evaluation form

Poster & oral presentation - Symposium proposal

N.B: All information here is strictly confidential to the selection process and must be used solely in the ambit of this conference.

Reviewer:*

Last nameFirst name

Email*

exemple@exemple.com

Number of projects to be evaluated:*

PROJECT 1

Project’s identification number*

NoneI have a link/conflict of interest that prevents me from evaluating them (Abstract to be transferred to another evaluator)

Eligibility of submissions

YesNo

Is considered in the scope of this conference submissions:
> belonging to one of the axes of the call for papers:

Axis n°1: Overview of the situation
Axis n°2: Legislation
Axis n°3: Return and access to work, maintenance of work and impact of cancer at work
Axis n°4: The diversity of occupational trajectories

> Other studies which intakes would be valuable for research regarding the theme Cancer, Work & Employment

If not, please comment:

YesNo

If not, please comment:

If no, the submission will be automatically considered as “To be rejected”.

Evaluation and Assessment

Type of submission:*

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Quality of the study and the methodology used
Clarity of the description of the research/intervention/study
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge (or future research results for ongoing study)
Innovative approach of the proposed study

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Ability to address the theme and meet the objectives of the symposium format and time
Relevance of each symposium’s interventions (coherence – scientific quality – scientific expertise regarding team -and added value)
Global quality of the proposed symposium
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge
Innovative approach of the proposed study

General comment & main strengths and limits : OPTIONAL: points to pay attention to/ recommendations to improve submission. Please, when filling this field consider possible intakes for research/policies in Europe.*

Please, grade this submission in coherence with the selection evaluation and based on scientific criteria. The source of funding may be mentioned as an element to be discussed with the scientific committee if necessary.

To be selectedTo be discussedTo be rejected

YesNo

Oral presentationPoster presentation

For "Oral or poster" submissions, please indicate "No" to the question "Suitable for the type of submission" and select the submission type that better fits.

PROJECT 2

Project’s identification number*

NoneI have a link/conflict of interest that prevents me from evaluating them (Abstract to be transferred to another evaluator)

Eligibility of submissions

YesNo

Is considered in the scope of this conference submissions:
> belonging to one of the axes of the call for papers:

Axis n°1: Overview of the situation
Axis n°2: Legislation
Axis n°3: Return and access to work, maintenance of work and impact of cancer at work
Axis n°4: The diversity of occupational trajectories

> Other studies which intakes would be valuable for research regarding the theme Cancer, Work & Employment

If not, please comment:

YesNo

If not, please comment:

If no, the submission will be automatically considered as “To be rejected”.

Evaluation and Assessment

Type of submission:*

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Quality of the study and the methodology used
Clarity of the description of the research/intervention/study
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge (or future research results for ongoing study)
Innovative approach of the proposed study

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Ability to address the theme and meet the objectives of the symposium format and time
Relevance of each symposium’s interventions (coherence – scientific quality – scientific expertise regarding team -and added value)
Global quality of the proposed symposium
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge
Innovative approach of the proposed study

General comment & main strengths and limits : OPTIONAL: points to pay attention to/ recommendations to improve submission. Please, when filling this field consider possible intakes for research/policies in Europe.*

Please, grade this submission in coherence with the selection evaluation and based on scientific criteria. The source of funding may be mentioned as an element to be discussed with the scientific committee if necessary.

To be selectedTo be discussedTo be rejected

YesNo

Oral presentationPoster presentation

For "Oral or poster" submissions, please indicate "No" to the question "Suitable for the type of submission" and select the submission type that better fits.

PROJECT 3

Project’s identification number*

NoneI have a link/conflict of interest that prevents me from evaluating them (Abstract to be transferred to another evaluator)

Eligibility of submissions

YesNo

Is considered in the scope of this conference submissions:
> belonging to one of the axes of the call for papers:

Axis n°1: Overview of the situation
Axis n°2: Legislation
Axis n°3: Return and access to work, maintenance of work and impact of cancer at work
Axis n°4: The diversity of occupational trajectories

> Other studies which intakes would be valuable for research regarding the theme Cancer, Work & Employment

If not, please comment:

YesNo

If not, please comment:

If no, the submission will be automatically considered as “To be rejected”.

Evaluation and Assessment

Type of submission:*

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Quality of the study and the methodology used
Clarity of the description of the research/intervention/study
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge (or future research results for ongoing study)
Innovative approach of the proposed study

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Ability to address the theme and meet the objectives of the symposium format and time
Relevance of each symposium’s interventions (coherence – scientific quality – scientific expertise regarding team -and added value)
Global quality of the proposed symposium
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge
Innovative approach of the proposed study

General comment & main strengths and limits : OPTIONAL: points to pay attention to/ recommendations to improve submission. Please, when filling this field consider possible intakes for research/policies in Europe.*

Please, grade this submission in coherence with the selection evaluation and based on scientific criteria. The source of funding may be mentioned as an element to be discussed with the scientific committee if necessary.

To be selectedTo be discussedTo be rejected

YesNo

Oral presentationPoster presentation

For "Oral or poster" submissions, please indicate "No" to the question "Suitable for the type of submission" and select the submission type that better fits.

PROJECT 4

Project’s identification number*

NoneI have a link/conflict of interest that prevents me from evaluating them (Abstract to be transferred to another evaluator)

Eligibility of submissions

YesNo

Is considered in the scope of this conference submissions:
> belonging to one of the axes of the call for papers:

Axis n°1: Overview of the situation
Axis n°2: Legislation
Axis n°3: Return and access to work, maintenance of work and impact of cancer at work
Axis n°4: The diversity of occupational trajectories

> Other studies which intakes would be valuable for research regarding the theme Cancer, Work & Employment

If not, please comment:

YesNo

If not, please comment:

If no, the submission will be automatically considered as “To be rejected”.

Evaluation and Assessment

Type of submission:*

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Quality of the study and the methodology used
Clarity of the description of the research/intervention/study
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge (or future research results for ongoing study)
Innovative approach of the proposed study

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Ability to address the theme and meet the objectives of the symposium format and time
Relevance of each symposium’s interventions (coherence – scientific quality – scientific expertise regarding team -and added value)
Global quality of the proposed symposium
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge
Innovative approach of the proposed study

General comment & main strengths and limits : OPTIONAL: points to pay attention to/ recommendations to improve submission. Please, when filling this field consider possible intakes for research/policies in Europe.*

Please, grade this submission in coherence with the selection evaluation and based on scientific criteria. The source of funding may be mentioned as an element to be discussed with the scientific committee if necessary.

To be selectedTo be discussedTo be rejected

YesNo

Oral presentationPoster presentation

For "Oral or poster" submissions, please indicate "No" to the question "Suitable for the type of submission" and select the submission type that better fits.

PROJECT 5

Project’s identification number*

NoneI have a link/conflict of interest that prevents me from evaluating them (Abstract to be transferred to another evaluator)

Eligibility of submissions

YesNo

Is considered in the scope of this conference submissions:
> belonging to one of the axes of the call for papers:

Axis n°1: Overview of the situation
Axis n°2: Legislation
Axis n°3: Return and access to work, maintenance of work and impact of cancer at work
Axis n°4: The diversity of occupational trajectories

> Other studies which intakes would be valuable for research regarding the theme Cancer, Work & Employment

If not, please comment:

YesNo

If not, please comment:

If no, the submission will be automatically considered as “To be rejected”.

Evaluation and Assessment

Type of submission:*

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Quality of the study and the methodology used
Clarity of the description of the research/intervention/study
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge (or future research results for ongoing study)
Innovative approach of the proposed study

Rate the project on a scale of A+ to D, A+ being best:*

Rows	A+	A	B	C	D
Ability to address the theme and meet the objectives of the symposium format and time
Relevance of each symposium’s interventions (coherence – scientific quality – scientific expertise regarding team -and added value)
Global quality of the proposed symposium
Contribution of these results to the existing science/current knowledge
Innovative approach of the proposed study

General comment & main strengths and limits : OPTIONAL: points to pay attention to/ recommendations to improve submission. Please, when filling this field consider possible intakes for research/policies in Europe.*

Please, grade this submission in coherence with the selection evaluation and based on scientific criteria. The source of funding may be mentioned as an element to be discussed with the scientific committee if necessary.

To be selectedTo be discussedTo be rejected

YesNo

Oral presentationPoster presentation

For "Oral or poster" submissions, please indicate "No" to the question "Suitable for the type of submission" and select the submission type that better fits.

How to save a draft?

1) Click on Save at the bottom of the form;
2) Then, click on "Skip Create an Account";

3) Finally, enter your e-mail and click on Send.