I, one of the People (as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), do present you with this notice that you, your agents, and your colleagues may provide due care;
Please take notice that the People have assembled and consulted for their common good and have taken joy in the work of the Supreme Court to affirm historical and Common Rights (as derivative of the Common Law) and not according to the pretended legislation of Public Servants. Public Servants wish to declare rights that are guaranteed in the State and Federal Constitution as objects that can be discarded once they have taken office. Please see the text from the one recent Opinion of the Supreme Court below:
“Today, we decline to adopt that two-part approach. In keeping with Heller, we hold that when the Second Amendment’s plain text covers an individual’s conduct, the Constitution presumptively protects that conduct. To justify its regulation, the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest. Rather, the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation. Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s “unqualified command.” Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal., 366 U. S. 36, 50, n. 10 (1961).3”
Please take notice that the People understand that Legislative Tribunals have been used, based on the Social Security Act of 1935, and following amendments, to establish an idea that the State and Local governments and Private Actors, have the authority to take children, without the Common Law and Jury of Peers as is required to remove life, liberty or property based on “presumed public government compelling interest.” They have adopted them to other families (and actually received federal funds in partnerships to do so) without historical basis or Common Law practice showing authority to do so. Please see evidence below:
Blacks Law 5th Edition: Adoption. Legal process pursuant to state statute in which a child’s legal rights and duties toward his natural parents are terminated and similar rights and duties toward his adoptive parents are substituted. To take into one’s family the child of another and give him or her the rights, privileges, and duties of a child and heir. The procedure is entirely statutory and has no historical basis in common law. Most adoptions are through agency placements.
It is my wish for Jim Jordan, the whole of the Legislature, and the Supreme Court Officers to declare whether the process of taking children, in return for federal funds, and force adopting them, has historical powers from the time of the American Revolution and under the Common Law. Please indicate your conclusion in light of the above Black’s Law 5th Edition definition, which states it has no historical basis in common law;
Please take further notice that as trustees of the People, you swore by Oath to protect the rights of the People; therefore, it is my wish for you to make public statements about this issue, and for the Supreme Court to declare that this practice is not in accordance with the historical tradition of this great nation. Please respond to this notice within 14 business days as this is a matter of necessity of the People. As Trustees, you are not allowed to let this Nation's People suffer while Trustees sit in silence. This notice is sent to you in the love of Christ and in Peace.