• Emotion Score Calculator.

    Based on the Unified Theory of Emotions (UNITE). Control Emotions, Control the World.

  • Pre-book copy of my upcoming book "The Atom of Emotions: The Science of Measuring and Mastering All Human Emotions in Everyday Life"

    Click here to buy the previous version of my Book from Amazon

    Click here to read the detailed theory of emotions and other related articles free

    Based on the ground breaking Unified Theory of Emotions (Unite) which gives a single method to understand all emotions in all relationships. Moreover, you can even compute the intensity of emotions using a simple method built into the theory. 

    Take this test for Youself and see what you really feel for any person or pet or thing. You can even take this test assuming you are someone else and then find out how they feel about you. You can then influence changes within yourself or others.

    Just input 3 numbers for the defined terms 1. EFFORT, 2. BLAME or THANKFULNESS and 3. PROXIMITY (Physical Proximity) and find everything about your emotions for anyone or anyone's emotions for you or others.  All these words are defined and you must understand the definitions before giving your scores.

    Emotions Calculator works not only for meansuring your emotions for other humans but also for animals, things, spirits (like God), Causes (like Save the planet, help the poor) or your own mental state (like anxiety, stress or depression)

    NOTE: All personal infomrtion inputs are optional and are never shared.

    What is Unified Theory of Emotions (UNITE)?:

    The Unified Theory of Emotions is a groundbreaking framework that applies universally—to everyone, in every relationship, and across all situations. Unlike thousands of other books on emotions or relationships, this theory provides a unique, actionable approach to understanding and influencing emotions. Whether you’re looking to strengthen your marriage, prevent breakups, maintain lifelong motivation, or avoid depression, this theory equips you with powerful tools to shape your emotional experiences and your interactions with others. Here are some of the transformative benefits you can achieve by mastering and applying the Unified Theory of Emotions:


    Benefits of Understanding and Applying the Unified Theory of Emotions:

    Understand exactly why you feel what you feel in any situation.
    Know how to influence and improve the way others feel about you.
    Strengthen and protect your marriage or long-term relationships.
    Prevent breakups or divorce by addressing issues before they escalate.
    Build trust and loyalty effortlessly with friends, family, and partners.
    Experience consistent motivation and a resilient sense of purpose.
    Avoid depression and stay emotionally balanced.
    Eliminate self-blame and increase your self-worth.
    Communicate in ways that naturally connect with others.
    Handle stress with calm and control, regardless of the situation.
    Reduce conflicts and resolve them smoothly when they arise.
    Manage difficult relationships without feeling overwhelmed.
    Deepen intimacy and connection in your romantic relationships.
    Prevent resentment and manage feelings of anger effectively.
    Lead others with ease and inspire them to follow you.
    Increase your productivity by eliminating emotional distractions.
    Find a clear direction in life, aligned with your emotional goals.
    Stay motivated even during setbacks and challenges.
    Influence others’ emotions positively, in personal or professional settings.
    Avoid toxic relationships and attract positive, supportive people.
    Build long-lasting friendships that bring joy and stability.
    Communicate persuasively and be heard in any situation.
    Manage criticism and feedback without taking it personally.
    Navigate family challenges with understanding and empathy.
    Face life’s toughest challenges with confidence and resilience.

    The Unified Theory of Emotions is a complete, universal system for navigating emotions and relationships. It transcends traditional approaches, providing a practical roadmap for happiness, resilience, and meaningful connections. Unlike other theories, which often offer fragmented advice, this theory integrates every aspect of emotion into a cohesive approach that anyone can apply. By understanding and using this theory, you can bring harmony, confidence, and lasting fulfillment into every area of your life.

  • I Am Ready To Discover The World Of Emotions

  • Please provide some information about yourself. They are not necessary for the test, but we would like to know the data for our records.

  • Step 1 : Choose Subject 1 and Subject 2 but understand what they mean first.

    • For the Definitions of ‘Subject 1’ and ‘Subject 2’ with detailed explanation click here 

    • Definition: ‘Subject 1’, Subject 2’


      The unified theory of emotions or UNITE applies to ALL emotions generated between ANY two ‘Subjects.’

       

      Subject 1 
      is the person or an intelligent / sane person whose emotions are being evaluated towards Subject 2. 

      Subject 2
      is a person / persons, animal, object, spirit, cause or mental state towards whom / which Subject 1 is evaluating his emotions.

       

  • Step 1 : Choose Subject 1 and Subject 2

  • So, you have selected Subject 1 and Subject 2. Please note, this exercise will show the emotions felt by Subject 1 towards Subject 2. It doesn’t mean that Subject 2 also feels the same emotions. If you want to know the emotions of Subject 2, change subject 2 to Subject 1 and then do this exercise.

  • Step 2 : Assign an ‘Effort’ Score but understand the definition first

    Now is the time for you to know another definition. It is called ‘Effort’. Do not assume what it means. It only means what its definition says.
    • For the Definition of ‘Effort’ with detailed explanation and scoring levels, click here 

    • As you learnt, the possible Proximity level and corresponding scores are summarised below. Please remember, if your chosen subject 2 is a spouse, your Proximity score can only be 8 or 9. If your Subject 2 is a person or thing you never touched, your Proximity score will be less than 6. Proximity score can be increased or decreased only a little in existing relationships.

      Level of Proximity Possible Proximity Score
      1 1
      2 2 or 3
      3 4 or 5
      4 6 or 7
      5 8 or 9
      6 10

  • Step 2 : Assign an ‘Effort’ Score

  •

  • Step 3 : Assign a ‘Blame’ or ‘Thankfulness’ Score once you understand the definitions

    Now you are ready to learn the next 2 definitions.
    • For the Definitions of ‘Blame’ and ‘Thankfulness’ with detailed explanations and scoring levels, click here 

    • Definition: Blame (Includes Negative Blame = ‘Thankfulness’)

       

      ‘Blame’ When Subject 1 does not like making the Effort and holds Subject 2 responsible for his Effort (past, present or future), it is called Blame. 

      Blame, used in relation to the theory, includes negative Blame, which is equivalent to Thankfulness.

      Thankfulness is when Subject 1, instead of blaming Subject 2, for the Effort, is Thankful to Subject 2, for making the Effort to Subject 1, or for letting Subject 1 make Effort for Subject 2.

      Additional Clarifications:

      • Definition of Blame - "To say or think that someone or something did something wrong or is responsible for something bad happening." (Cambridge dictionary). The definition of Blame under the Unified Theory of Emotions is the same as the dictionary meaning, except that ‘something bad happening’ is the Effort made by Subject 1. It could be Effort that Subject 1 fears will have to be taken by Subject 1 because of Subject 2.
      • Another noteworthy point is that Subject 1 has three states of thought towards Subject 2 because of whom he must make Effort.

      (i)      Blame - When Subject 1 thinks Subject 2 is responsible for his Effort, he is blaming Subject 2.

      Examples of Blame for the Effort made for Subject 2:

      • Blaming a spouse for not earning enough to support the current lifestyle.

      • Blaming a friend who requests bringing a packet from his aunt in flight from a foreign country, shouting at someone indulging in public nuisance and

      • Talking behind someone's back to harm him.

      (ii) No Blame - When Subject 1 does not think or does not care that Subject 2 is responsible for his Effort, he is not blaming Subject 2.

      Examples of No Blame will include – Making 'reasonable' Effortfor someone, passing on the salt, when another diner requests, following traffic rules. Here Subject 1 neither Blames nor is Thankful to Subject 2 for the Effort.

      (iii) Thankfulness – It is defined below.

      Definition of Thankfulness

      ‘Thankfulness’ When, instead of Blaming Subject 2 for the Effort, Subject 1 is Thankful to Subject 2 for the opportunity to make the Effort for Subject 2, it is called ‘Thankfulness.’

      Subject 1 can experience Thankfulness towards Subject 2 for the Effort, due to:

      • the nature of the Effort, or,

      • the nature of the Subject 2 or,

      • the nature of his relationship with Subject 2.

               An Example of Thankfulness for Effort:– A mother is almost always Thankful to her child for all the Effort she makes for the child before and after birth. The amount of Effort is almost the maximum possible. However, the amount of Thankfulness to the child for the Effort is also almost the maximum. Another example would be doing things for someone Subject 1 holds in very high esteem or considers his idol. Subject 1 will be Thankful to Subject 2 for allowing him to make the Effort. For example, a devotee is Thankful to his God for the Effort he is making for his God. The Effort may include doing daily prayers, going to shrines, and doing other things specified in his religion.

               It is important to note that often, Subject 1 would not even be ready to call all that he does for/because of Subject 2 as 'Effort.' At times, Subject 1 may get offended to hear that he is making 'Effort' for someone he holds so dear in his heart. Subject 1 would instead call what he does as 'duty,' 'care,' 'natural,' 'humble contribution' & the like. Subject 1 is often a mother, a devout person, someone trying to repay his dues or someone with a deep sense of duty. A couple of examples are. Let’s say Subject 2 had helped Subject 1 when Subject 1 was in deep Trouble, and no one else was helping, or Subject 1 is a staunch sect/cult member. Subject 1, in these examples, would not want to call all that he does and all the efforts he does as his ‘Effort.’ But, as you are aware, 'Effort' is just the name I have given to represent what I want to convey through a specific definition of the term. The term does not represent its dictionary meaning.

      So there can be 3 mental states of Subject 1 towards Subject 2.

      1. Blame,

      2. No Blame, or

      3. Thankfulness.

      BENCHMARKS or Levels of ‘Blame’ and ‘Thankfulness’:

      Levels of ‘Blame’

      When the Subject 1 does not Blame Subject 2 for the Effort – The score is +1

      When Subject 1 Blames Subject 2 – The score can go from -1 to -10 depending upon how much Subject 1 Blames Subject 2.

      A Blame score of -10 will occur when Subject 1 believes that:

      Subject 2 has given, is giving or will give him substantial, undesirable, unnecessary Effort, repeatedly Subject 2 should have known fully well that Subject 1 does not like to take such Effort.

      Blame score of -2 to -9 will occur considering the how strongly Subject 1 Blames subject 2

      Levels of ‘Thankfulness’:

      When Subject 1, instead of Blaming Subject 2 for the Effort, feel Thankful to Subject 2 for being there, the Thankfulness score is +2

      When Subject 1 feels more Thankful towards Subject 2 for the Effort Subject 1 makes, Thankfulness score can go higher from +3 to +10

      Benchmark for Thankfulness Score:

      A Thankfulness score of 10 only occurs in one human relation. That is the amount of Thankfulness a mother feels towards her child, although she makes the most amount of Effort possible for any human being. This is even more true when it is the first, healthy child as wanted by the mother.

      Despite making the most Effort  for her child, the child is innocent and gives the motherhood to the mother. Therefore, she feels the highest level of Thankfulness towards her child.

      Thankfulness score of 3 to 9 will occur considering the how strongly Subject 1 feels Thankful towards subject 2 for being there.

      Chose a score of +10 if the level of Thankfulness of Subject 1 towards Subject 2 is as strong as the mother for her baby. In other situations, choose a lower number.

  • Step 3 : Assign a ‘Blame’ or ‘Thankfulness’ Score

  •

  • Step 4 : Assign a Physical Proximity or ‘Proximity Score' as per its definition below:

  • We now have enough information to tell if Subject 1 has positive or negative emotions towards Subject 2. But, to know the intensity of positive or negative emotions or strongly Subject 1 feels the emotions towards Subject 2, you need to provide one last information.

    So, is the time to know another definition. It is called Proximity.

    • For the Definitions of ‘Proximity’ with detailed explanations and scoring levels, click here 

    • As you learnt, the possible Proximity level and corresponding scores are summarised below. Please remember, if your chosen subject 2 is a spouse, your Proximity score can only be 8 or 9. If your Subject 2 is a person or thing you never touched, your Proximity score will be less than 6. Proximity score can be increased or decreased only a little in existing relationships.

      Level of Proximity Possible Proximity Score
      1 1
      2 2 or 3
      3 4 or 5
      4 6 or 7
      5 8 or 9
      6 10

  • Step 4 : Assign a ‘Proximity’ Score

  • As you learnt, the possible Proximity level and corresponding scores are summarised below. Please remember, if your chosen subject 2 is a spouse, your Proximity score can only be 8 or 9. If your Subject 2 is a person or thing you never touched, your Proximity score will be less than 6. Proximity score can be increased or decreased only a little in existing relationships.

    Level of Proximity Possible Proximity Score
    1 1
    2 2 or 3
    3 4 or 5
    4 6 or 7
    5 8 or 9
    6 10

  • As you learnt, the possible Proximity level and corresponding scores are summarised below. Please remember, if your chosen subject 2 is a spouse, your Proximity score can only be 8 or 9. If your Subject 2 is a person or thing you never touched, your Proximity score will be less than 6. Proximity score can be increased or decreased only a little in existing relationships.

    Level of Proximity Possible Proximity Score
    1 1
    2 2 or 3
    3 4 or 5
    4 6 or 7
    5 8 or 9
    6 10

  • Result

  • The maximum possible score is +1000. This signified maximum love, elation, or devotion. A positive number less than 1000 shows the relative amount of positive emotions.


    The maximum score for negative emotions is -1000. Which shows maximum hatred, depression, or disregard. A negative number less than 1000 shows the relative amount of negative emotions.


    Zero score shows no positive or negative emotions towards Subject 2. In other words, Subject 1 is unaware of Subject 2 or is indifferent.

  • Definition: Blame (Includes Negative Blame = ‘Thankfulness’)

     

    ‘Blame’ When Subject 1 does not like making the Effort and holds Subject 2 responsible for his Effort (past, present or future), it is called Blame. 

    Blame, used in relation to the theory, includes negative Blame, which is equivalent to Thankfulness.

    Thankfulness is when Subject 1, instead of blaming Subject 2, for the Effort, is Thankful to Subject 2, for making the Effort to Subject 1, or for letting Subject 1 make Effort for Subject 2.

    Additional Clarifications:

    • Definition of Blame - "To say or think that someone or something did something wrong or is responsible for something bad happening." (Cambridge dictionary). The definition of Blame under the Unified Theory of Emotions is the same as the dictionary meaning, except that ‘something bad happening’ is the Effort made by Subject 1. It could be Effort that Subject 1 fears will have to be taken by Subject 1 because of Subject 2.
    • Another noteworthy point is that Subject 1 has three states of thought towards Subject 2 because of whom he must make Effort.

    (i)      Blame - When Subject 1 thinks Subject 2 is responsible for his Effort, he is blaming Subject 2.

    Examples of Blame for the Effort made for Subject 2:

    • Blaming a spouse for not earning enough to support the current lifestyle.

    • Blaming a friend who requests bringing a packet from his aunt in flight from a foreign country, shouting at someone indulging in public nuisance and

    • Talking behind someone's back to harm him.

    (ii) No Blame - When Subject 1 does not think or does not care that Subject 2 is responsible for his Effort, he is not blaming Subject 2.

    Examples of No Blame will include – Making 'reasonable' Effortfor someone, passing on the salt, when another diner requests, following traffic rules. Here Subject 1 neither Blames nor is Thankful to Subject 2 for the Effort.

    (iii) Thankfulness – It is defined below.

    Definition of Thankfulness

    ‘Thankfulness’ When, instead of Blaming Subject 2 for the Effort, Subject 1 is Thankful to Subject 2 for the opportunity to make the Effort for Subject 2, it is called ‘Thankfulness.’

    Subject 1 can experience Thankfulness towards Subject 2 for the Effort, due to:

    • the nature of the Effort, or,

    • the nature of the Subject 2 or,

    • the nature of his relationship with Subject 2.

             An Example of Thankfulness for Effort:– A mother is almost always Thankful to her child for all the Effort she makes for the child before and after birth. The amount of Effort is almost the maximum possible. However, the amount of Thankfulness to the child for the Effort is also almost the maximum. Another example would be doing things for someone Subject 1 holds in very high esteem or considers his idol. Subject 1 will be Thankful to Subject 2 for allowing him to make the Effort. For example, a devotee is Thankful to his God for the Effort he is making for his God. The Effort may include doing daily prayers, going to shrines, and doing other things specified in his religion.

             It is important to note that often, Subject 1 would not even be ready to call all that he does for/because of Subject 2 as 'Effort.' At times, Subject 1 may get offended to hear that he is making 'Effort' for someone he holds so dear in his heart. Subject 1 would instead call what he does as 'duty,' 'care,' 'natural,' 'humble contribution' & the like. Subject 1 is often a mother, a devout person, someone trying to repay his dues or someone with a deep sense of duty. A couple of examples are. Let’s say Subject 2 had helped Subject 1 when Subject 1 was in deep Trouble, and no one else was helping, or Subject 1 is a staunch sect/cult member. Subject 1, in these examples, would not want to call all that he does and all the efforts he does as his ‘Effort.’ But, as you are aware, 'Effort' is just the name I have given to represent what I want to convey through a specific definition of the term. The term does not represent its dictionary meaning.

    So there can be 3 mental states of Subject 1 towards Subject 2.

    1. Blame,

    2. No Blame, or

    3. Thankfulness.

    BENCHMARKS or Levels of ‘Blame’ and ‘Thankfulness’:

    Levels of ‘Blame’

    When the Subject 1 does not Blame Subject 2 for the Effort – The score is +1

    When Subject 1 Blames Subject 2 – The score can go from -1 to -10 depending upon how much Subject 1 Blames Subject 2.

    A Blame score of -10 will occur when Subject 1 believes that:

    Subject 2 has given, is giving or will give him substantial, undesirable, unnecessary Effort, repeatedly Subject 2 should have known fully well that Subject 1 does not like to take such Effort.

    Blame score of -2 to -9 will occur considering the how strongly Subject 1 Blames subject 2

    Levels of ‘Thankfulness’:

    When Subject 1, instead of Blaming Subject 2 for the Effort, feel Thankful to Subject 2 for being there, the Thankfulness score is +2

    When Subject 1 feels more Thankful towards Subject 2 for the Effort Subject 1 makes, Thankfulness score can go higher from +3 to +10

    Benchmark for Thankfulness Score:

    A Thankfulness score of 10 only occurs in one human relation. That is the amount of Thankfulness a mother feels towards her child, although she makes the most amount of Effort possible for any human being. This is even more true when it is the first, healthy child as wanted by the mother.

    Despite making the most Effort  for her child, the child is innocent and gives the motherhood to the mother. Therefore, she feels the highest level of Thankfulness towards her child.

    Thankfulness score of 3 to 9 will occur considering the how strongly Subject 1 feels Thankful towards subject 2 for being there.

    Chose a score of +10 if the level of Thankfulness of Subject 1 towards Subject 2 is as strong as the mother for her baby. In other situations, choose a lower number.

  • +1 to +100

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils ALL of the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 likes Subject 2 and wishes Subject 2 well.

    b. Subject 2 is a distant person, animal, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that Subject 1 doesn’t intend to do any mental or physical work.

    c. Subject 1 has never physically touched Subject 1. Subject 2 is also not expected to touch Subject 1 in future.

    d. Subject 2 is not any immediate family member or love interest of Subject 1

    e. Subject 2 is not the dog of Subject 1

    f. Subject 2 is not in a position to make Subject 1 do physical or mental work.

    g. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s mental or physical state.

    h. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s school or college friends who meet often.

    i. If Subject 2 falls sick or needs money or in dire need of something important, Subject 1 may not even come to know about it and Subject 2 is not likely to ask Subject 1 for help.

    j. In all above cases, Subject 1 doesn’t Blame Subject 2 and does not mind Subject 2’s existence.

  • +101 to +300

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils ALL of the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 likes, respects, admires Subject 2.

    b. Subject 2 is a person, animal, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that Subject 1 occasionally sees or meets but doesn’t do make much Effort for.

    c. Subject 1 can physically touched Subject 1. Subjects are also not expected to have close contact with each other.

    d. Subject 2 is not any immediate family member or love interest of Subject 1

    e. Subject 2 is not the dog of Subject 1

    f. Subject 2 is not in a position to make Subject 1 do much physical or mental work.

    g. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s mental or physical state.

    h. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s school or college friends who meet often.

    i. If Subject 2 falls sick or needs money or in dire need of something important, Subject 1 may provide some help if someone asks.

    j. In all above cases, Subject 1 doesn’t Blame Subject 2 and may infact be a little Thankful to Subject 2.

    k. Subject 1 like Subject 2.

  • +301 to +600

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 loves, likes a lot, cares for, respects, admires Subject 2 and is happy and proud of Subject 2 for being in Subject 1’s life.

    b. Subject 2 is a person, animal, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that Subject 1 that comes in physical contact of Subject 1 often or one who Subject 1 thinks about often.

    c. Subject 1 knows Subject 2 well. Subjects may have closer contacts in the future.

    d. Subject 2 can be a family member but is not likely to be his spouse or young child or small dog.

    e. Subject 2 can make Subject 1 do some physical or mental work often. Subject 1 doesn’t mind it so far and is generally happy to make the Effort or be in touch.

    f. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s mental or physical state.

    g. Subject 2 can be Subject 1’s school or college friends who meet often.

    h. If Subject 2 falls sick or needs money or in dire need of something important, Subject 1 will definitely help.

    i. In all above cases, Subject 1 doesn’t Blame Subject 2 and may, in fact, be a little Thankful to Subject 2.

    j. Subject 1 like Subject 2 a lot or loves a little. It may be called by other positive names like respect, care or dedication.

  • +601 to +999

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 loves, respects, cares for, worships subject 2 and loves Subject 2 for being there.

    b. Subject 2 is a close family member, spouse, child, a small dog or self-belief or a cause to which Subject 1 has dedicated his life.

    c. Subject 1 has made a lot of Effort for Subject 2 but is Thankful to Subject 2 for being what it is.

    d. Subject 2 may be a spirit like God to which Subject 1 has dedicated his life to. It could be a pet Dog who demands constant attention from Subject 1 or a similar pet, hobby or addiction.

    e. Subject 2 may be someone whose life Subject 1 has saved or changed for the better.

    f. Subject 2 can makes Subject 1 do a lot of physical or mental work often. Subject 1 is happy to make the Effort.

    g. Subject 2 can be Subject 1’s mental or physical state which Subject 1 is proud of.

    h. Subject 2 can be Subject 1’s best friend.

    i. If Subject 2 falls sick or needs money or in dire need of something important, Subject 1 will help.

    j. In all above cases, Subject 1 doesn’t Blame Subject 2 and may, in fact, be a little Thankful to Subject 2.

    k. Subject 1 loves Subject 2. Subject 2 is very close to Subject 1 and Subject 1 is Thankful for it. It may be called by other positive names like care or dedication.

  • +1000

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 absolutely, loves, adores or worships Subject 2 to the maximum degree possible.

    b. Subject 2 is Subject 1’s child.

    c. Subject 2 is a spirit like God, who Subject 1 feels inside himself.

    d. Subject 2 can be a physical state like a country if Subject 1 believes it is a living being and he resides under such a living being.

    e. Subject 2 can be Subject 1’s mental state like his physical or mental abilities that Subject 1 is very proud of.

    f. In all above cases, Subject 1 is very Thankful to Subject 2 or God for giving him Subject 2 or helping him discover Subject 2.

    g. Subject 1 loves Subject 2 at the maximum level possible.

    h. Subject 1 will protect Subject 2 with his/her life.

    i. Subject 1’s love may be called by other positive names like extreme dedication.

  • -1 to -100

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 dislikes, disrespects or is disgusted by Subject 1 a little.

    b. Subject 1 has made some Effort because of Subject 2 or Subject 1 has not forgotten / cannot forget Subject 2.

    c. Subject 2 is a distant person, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that Subject 1 doesn’t enjoy to be.

    d. Subject 1 Blames Subject 2 a little for being there.

    e. Subject 1 has never physically touched Subject 1. Subject 2 is also not expected to touch Subject 1 in future.

    f. Subject 2 is not any immediate family member or love interest of Subject 1

    g. Subject 2 is not the dog or a personal item or a regular food item of Subject 1

    h. Subject 2 is not in a position anymore to make Subject 1 make Effort for Subject 2.

    i. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s mental or physical state.

    j. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s school or college friends who meet often.

    k. If Subject 2 falls sick or needs money or in dire need of something important, Subject 1 may not even come to know about it and Subject 2 is not likely to ask Subject 1 for help.

  • -101 to -300

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 dislikes, disrespects or is disgusted by Subject 2 a good amount.

    b. Subject 1 has made good amount of Effort because of Subject 2 or Subject 1 has not forgotten / cannot forget Subject 2.

    c. Subject may be person, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that has physically or mentally affected Subject 1.

    d. Subject 1 Blames Subject 2 a little for being there.

    e. Subject 1 has never physically touched Subject 1. Subject 2 is also not expected to touch Subject 1 in future.

    f. Subject 2 is not any immediate family member or love interest of Subject 1

    g. Subject 2 is not the dog or a personal item or a regular food item of Subject 1

    h. Subject 2 is not in a position anymore to make Subject 1 make Effort for Subject 2.

    i. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s mental or physical state.

    j. Subject 2 is not Subject 1’s school or college friends who meet often.

    k. If Subject 2 falls sick or needs money or in dire need of something important, Subject 1 will not help. Instead, Subject 1 may feel happy to know that Subject 2 is suffering.

  • -301 to -600

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 hates, dislikes a lot, is disrespectful or is disgusted by Subject 2 a good amount.

    b. Subject 1 does not wish Subject 2 well. Subject 1 would like Subject 2 to disappear from his life, but knows it will not happen easily.

    c. Subject 1 Blames Subject 2 a lot for all the Effort caused by Subject 2.

    d. It is possible that Subject 1 actually liked or loved Subject 2 earlier but started Blaming Subject 2 later and now dislikes or hates Subject 2.

    e. Subject 1 has madee Effort because of Subject 2 or Subject 1 has not forgotten / cannot forget Subject 2.

    f. Subject may be person, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that in the past, present or future constantly touched or overlapped with the physical body of Subject 1.

    g. Subject 2 may be the spouse, love interest immediate family member, past friend, office colleague or his own physical or mental condition.

    h. Subject 2 is still causing  Subject 1 to make Effort directly or indirectly.

    i. If Subject 1 is scared that Subject 2 will still cause Subject 1 to make Effort even though Subject 1 would not like to make any more Effort for Subject 1.

  • -601 to -900

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 hates, or is thoroughly disgusted by or feels depressed or terrified by Subject 2 to a very large degree.

    b. Subject 1 wishes bad things or destruction for Subject 2 well and may even want to harm Subject 2 given a chance.

    c. Subject 1 absolutely Blames Subject 2 a lot for all his Effort caused by Subject 2.

    d. Subject 1 may be feeling cheated or defrauded by Subject 1.

    e. It is possible that Subject 1 actually liked or loved Subject 2 earlier but started Blaming Subject 2 later and now really hates Subject 2 to a very high degree.

    f. Subject 1 has made a large amount of Effort because of Subject 2 and Subject 1 has not forgotten / cannot forget the Effort caused by Subject 2 or the Effort Subject 2 may still cause Subject 1 to make.

    g. Subject 2 is the spouse, immediate family member, a business partner, love interest, past good friend, office colleague or his own physical or mental condition. Subject 2 can also be a food or drink item that Subject 1 used to enjoy earlier but it caused Subject 1 to make a lot of Effort.

    h. Subject 2 may be ex-spouse, ex-lover, thing, cause, spirit, cause or a mental or physical state that in the past, present or future constantly touched or overlapped with the physical body of Subject 1.

    i. Subject 2 may have physically harmed or raped Subject 1.

    j. Subject 2 is still causing Subject 1 to make Effort directly or indirectly.

    k. If Subject 2 is knows that Subject 2 will / can still cause Subject 1 to make Effort even though Subject 1 would not like to make any more Effort for Subject 1.

  • -1000

    Interpretation

    Subject 2 fulfils the following conditions:

    a. Subject 1 hates, disgusted or is depressed or terrified by Subject 2 to the highest degree possible.

    b. Subject 1 wants Subject 2 to be dead or disappeared. Subject 1 may want to harm Subject 2 given a chance.

    c. Subject 1 Blames Subject 2 to the highest degree possible for all the Effort caused by Subject 2. Subject 2 is still constantly causing Subject 1 to make Effort.

    d. It is possible that Subject 1 once loved Subject 2 madly but has started Blaming Subject 2 because of the pain and suffering Subject 2 caused Subject 1.

    e. Subject 1 cannot forget Subject 2 and cannot get rid of Subject 2.

    f. Subject is estranged child, estranged or ex-spouse or lover or a thing, cause or a mental or physical state that Subject 1 in the past felt within Subject 1 or felt itself to be within Subject 2.

  • Feedback

  • Did you know?

  •  
  • Should be Empty: