Example Three
PRACTICE STANDARD 4: QUALITY
Overview of Standard: Quality initiatives in Pathway to Excellence organizations are developed through interprofessional collaboration. The organization-wide quality initiatives are evidence-based, focused on improving patient outcomes, and implemented based on internal and external benchmarking. These initiatives include developing and revising patient care standards and policies as well as staff education. Interprofessional teams within Pathway organizations are patient advocates driven by strong missions, visions, goals, and values.
Element of Performance 4.1
Describe the process for external benchmarking.
AND
Provide one example of unit-based, nurse-led quality initiative that was implemented based on an external benchmark that was not being met. Include the benchmark and the name of the source of the agency of the external benchmark used.
Organization’s narrative response for EOP 4.1:
KMC uses the rapid cycle quality improvement process of Plan, Do, Study and Act (PDSA). This process is used for problem identification, redesign, evaluation and improvement. If benchmarks are not met, then a quality improvement process is implemented. Evidence-based practices (EBP) are evaluated, put into operation and refined while progress is measured by the established benchmarks.For example, patient satisfaction is benchmarked using an external vendor, which allows us to benchmark our patient satisfaction at a national level by hospital and unit type for inpatient and outpatients. This data has led to the quality initiative of the “nursing care bundle” which includes nurse leader rounding and nurse hourly rounding with a focus on pain, repositioning and bathroom needs. Other examples of quality improvement initiatives based on external benchmarks include the fall prevention program, hospital acquired conditions, readmissions, and core measures.
Reduction in 30 Day Congestive Heart Failure Readmissions
In 2012, the Affordable Care Act 3025 was implemented by CMS. A quality of care focus of this act included a reduction in 30 day post discharge readmission rates. KMC uses the Midas+DataVision, a national comparative database, to benchmark 30 day readmission rates. The KMC Quality Committee met and was analyzing KMC 30 day readmission data, and found KMC’s readmission rate from FY12 (19%) to FY13 (30%) had almost doubled with the patients with a diagnosis of heart failure (HF).
In October 2014, KMC set a target of 13.2%, which is the top 15 percentile of the Midas+DataVision HF readmission rates. AN RN-student from nearby community college researched the LACE program and presented her research paper to the Unit Director who invited her to the next Quality Committee meeting. Based on the article published in 2010 by Van Walraven, Dhalla, Bell, et al., and the collaborative discussion, the committee agreed KMC should focus on reducing 30 day post discharge readmissions. The key indicators of the LACE program include:
- L = Length of Stay – risk goes up with length of stay
- A = Acuity – risk goes up with emergent or urgent admissions
- C = Comorbidity – risk goes up with certain comorbidities
- E = ED visits – risk goes up with number of ED visits in the past 6 months
Patients with a LACE score of 9 or above are identified as at a higher risk for readmission. The basis behind LACE is that by identifying high readmission risk patients shortly after admission and implementing specific care interventions, readmissions can be reduced. One strategy is to improve transitions and coordinate care across the continuum. Four key areas to improve the transitions from the hospital to post-acute care settings include: assessment of post-hospital needs; effective teaching; posthospital care follow-up; and real time hand over communications. A readmission prevention protocol, Care Path, and Standard Operating Procedure were developed utilizing evidence-based interventions. Staff volunteereed to be champions of their new program.
The LACE tool quality improvement initiative at KMC has led to a dramatic decrease in the 30 day post discharge readmission rates for HF patients from 19% risk adjusted for same months, to well below the established benchmark.