Judge form
CPRC 2024 Annual Spring Meeting
Judge Information
This is to avoid duplicate submission.
Name of Judge
*
First Name
Last Name
Back
Next
Name of Presenter
*
First Name
Last Name
Presentation title
*
Affiliation
Presentation type
*
Poster
Platform
Conflict of Interest
*
Yes
No
Back
Next
Scale (Total 40 pts)
1 completely unsatisfactory, 2 partially meets criteria, 3 acceptable, 4 exceeds expectations, 5 exceptional
Part I: Quality of Presentation and Research
Completeness: Introduction, Hypothesis/Goals, Methods, Results, Conclusions
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Content: Soundness of approach/methodology, results and discussion
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Context: Background, relevance, significance of contribution
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Mastery: Depth of understanding and knowledge of field
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Part II: Visual Impact
Clarity: Overall layout and clarity, effectiveness in reinforcing presentation
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Mechanism: Progression (flow) and effectiveness in reinforcing presentation
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Style: Innovative use of imagery and layout, engaging
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
Part III: Defense of Presentation
Clarity of answers to questions, demonstrated knowledge of work by responding to judge's questions
Needs Improvement
1
2
3
4
Exceeds Expectations
5
1 is Needs Improvement, 5 is Exceeds Expectations
COMMENTS (e.g., suggested areas of improvement, most impressive aspects etc.):
Submit
Should be Empty: