TOA 2023 Annual Meeting
April 14-15, 2023 | San Antonio
Name
*
First Name
Last Name
Credentials
*
MD
DO
Other
Address
*
Street Address
Street Address Line 2
City
State / Province
Postal / Zip Code
Email
*
example@example.com
Friday, April 14: Learning Objectives
Identify mid-level scope of practice bills that were introduce in the 2023 Texas Legislature. | Review the state's new prior authorization law to determine how your practice will need to prepare. | Review the latest regulations related to the No Surprises Act. | Determine how the No Surprises Act may requiire you to change your delivery of care. | Identify unique aspects of private equity to determine how they could influence your delivery of care. | Determine how payers are relying on clinical integration, including data integration and analytics, to connect cost to quality. | Identify tools that different orthopaedic practice settings are utilizing to deliver higher quality and more efficient care. | Review best practices for keeping staff members happy to enhance clinical outcomes in the practice. | Apply the correct codes to prevent denials. | Review the latest coding guidelines as they relate to orthopaedics. | Classify various 3D printing methods for medical products. | Determine how 3D modeling and products can be used to enhance greater surgical precision for orthopaedics. | Identify areas in orthopaedics in which AI can be used to enhance practices. | Determine if multi-directional instability is associated with arthrofibrosis commonly seen with metal-ion allergies in failed TKA patients. | Determine if Nexgen sequencing can recover more than one organism from draining sinus tracts and whether or not pretreating with oral or systematic antibiotics has an effect on this recovery means. | Evaluate UKA vs. HTO for treating unicompartmental arthritis. | Compare the eiffcacy of CT Capsular Width Sign with a proven modality of Rapid Sequence MRI developed at UT Houston in diagnosing IFNF. | Review the relationship between patient post-operative visit attendance and the distance traveled to receive care. | Determine the value of prudent intraoperative technique related to hip fractures. | Determine if fracture extension and bone quality are better evaluated by CT. | Determine if an association exists between the duration of external fixation and positive reaming cultures at the time of definitive fixation with intramedullary nailing.
Friday, April 14: Potential Hours
Public Policy Review (0.25) | Arbitration & The No Surprises Act (0.50) | New Financing and Growth Models and Payer Contracting Ideas (1.0) | Digging Deep: The Different Orthopaedic Practice Settings (0.50) | What Every Orthopaedic Surgeon Needs to Know About Their Business Office - Part 1 (0.75) | Multi-Directional Instability Associated With Metal-Ion Allergies Mimicking Periprosthetic Joint Infections + The Results of 16S DNA-NexGen Sequencing (NGS) in Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections (0.25) | What Every Orthopaedic Surgeon Needs to Know About Their Business Office - Part 2 (1.0) | What Every Orthopaedic Surgeon Needs to Know About Their Business Office - Part 3 (1.0) | The Future of 3D Printing in Orthopaedics (1.0) | Surgeon Side Hustles (0.75) | Comparative Analysis of Unicompartmental Total Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy: Time to Total Knee Arthroplasty and Other Outcome Measures + Rapid Sequence MRI vs CT Capsular Width Sign for Detection of Occult Femoral Neck Fractures Associated With Femoral Shaft Fractures + Factors Influencing Compliance to Follow-up Visits in Orthopaedic Surgery + Hip Fracture Fixation Requiring Angioembolization + The Influence of CT Imaging on Treatment of Periprosthetic Proximal Femur Fractures + Is Duration of External Fixator Placement Associated With Positive Reaming Cultures? (0.50)
Out of 7.50 possible hours on Friday, how many are you claiming?
*
Friday's presentations were presented objectively and were free of commercial bias.
Yes
No
If no, please explain the commercial bias.
Friday's activity supported the achievement of each of the learning objectives.
*
Yes
No
If no, please specify why it didn't meet the learning objectives.
Do you plan to make any changes after participating in Friday's activity?
*
Yes
No
If you plan to make changes after participating in this activity, please list a few changes. (You will greatly help TOA's CME if you provide a few examples!!)
Friday CME Speakers: Please rate the speakers on his/her content, knowledge and presentation skill. (Required for the CME talk(s) that you are claiming.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Terrible
Bobby Hillert
Adam Bruggeman
Alla LaRoque
Tony Burns
Mel Gunawardena
Scott LaRoque
Sam Peters
Matthew Morrey
Andrew Whaley
Cuyler Dear
Nicholas Gerken
Karen Zupko
Christopher Kruelen
Thomas Burns
Joel Jenne
Scott Hecox
David Teuscher
Gerhard Maale
Dang-Huy Do
Wade Karam
Alexis Rounds
Paul Gaschen
Canon Cornelius
Adeet Amin
Saturday, April 15
Review the practical use of patient reported outcomes in an orthopaedic practice. | Identify the barriers to implementing a successful patient reported outcome program. | Recognize common and validated patient-reported outcomes measures and select the most appropriate ones for a given purpose. | Illustrate how to incorporate routine collection and use of PROs into clinical practice. | Compare and contrast the different approaches to fixing the long head of the biceps. | Debate the approaches to acute carpal tunnel and perilunate/lunate dislocations. | Debate the approaches to upper extremity compartment syndrome. | Review the latest literature related to infections and injection injuries. | Review cases related to mangled hand/replants. | Debate the approaches related to patella fractures. | Debate the approaches related to treating proximal humerus fractures. | Debate the approaches related to treating intertrochanteric fractures. | Review the approaches related to treating ankle fractures. | Evaluate common clases seen in a foot and ankle sub-specialty. | Analyze clinical decision making as it relates to ankle cases. | Review current management practices to avoid pitfalls. | Review the National Payer Coalition work on specialty condition-based models of musculoskeletal care. | Review UT-Austin's Musculoskeletal Institute's MSK playbook and approach to building comprehensive value-based models of care. | Review Medicare's latest rule related to patient-reported outcomes. | Explain how patient-reported outcomes can be used to improve shared decision making. | Test physicians' knowledge in different orthopaedic subspecialties. | Evaluate the effectiveness of a novel procedure for augmenting pelvic osteotomies for additional femoral coverage. | Review the rate of symptomatic hardware removal for all midshaft clavicle fractures from 2014 to 2018. | Review the effects of postop IVA on total postop opioid use, immediate postop opioid use in the first three postop days, pain scales and hospital length of stay for patients undergoing operative fixation for hip fracture. | Analyze and compare resident intraoperative MHR and AHR over the course of a three-month arthroplasty rotation.
Saturday, April 15: Potential Hours
Intrailiac Osteotomy With Superior Lateral Outcropping of Bone: A Previously Undescribed Procedure for Hip Subluxation in Cerebral Palsy + Rate of Secondary Surgery and Implant Removal Following Superior, Pre-Contoured Plating of Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fractures + Efficacy of Intravenous Acetaminophen in Postoperative Geriatric Hip Fracture Patients + Utilizing WHOOP Inc’s Continuous Physiological Monitoring (CPM) Device to Measure Residents’ Intraoperative Maximum Heart Rate (MHR) and Average Heart Rate (AHR) While Performing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty (0.25) | Patient Reported Outcome Measures Are Here to Stay: How Do I Use Them in My Practice? or Sports Medicine Breakout Panel (0.75) | Hand/Wrist Breakout Panel or Trauma Breakout Panel (1.0) | Foot/Ankle Breakout Session or Value-Based Models (1.0) | Resident Quiz Bowl (1.0)
Out of 4.0 possible hours on Saturday, how many are you claiming?
*
Saturday's presentations were presented objectively and were free of commercial bias.
*
Yes
No
If no, please explain the commercial bias.
Saturday's activity supported the achievement of each of the learning objectives.
*
Yes
No
If no, please specify why it didn't meet the learning objectives.
Do you plan to make any changes after participating in Saturday's activity?
*
Yes
No
If you plan to make changes after participating in this activity, please list a few changes. (You will greatly help TOA's CME if you provide a few examples!!)
Saturday CME Speakers: Please rate the speakers on his/her content, knowledge and presentation skill. (Required for the CME talk(s) that you are claiming.
Excellent
Above Average
Average
Below Average
Terrible
Karl Koenig
Prakash Jayakumar
Christian Balldin
Lane Naugher
Stephen Gates
Travis Burns
Brian Sager
Christina Brady
John Faillace
Nilesh Chaudhari
Animesh Agarwal
Anil Dutta
Drew Sanders
Mark Foreman
Jerry Grimes
Kevin Kirk
Jeannie Huh
Kyle Dickson
Submit
Should be Empty: