PLEASE READ THE INFORMATION BELOW BEFORE SUBMITTING AN EDUCATION SESSION PROPOSAL
2024 Annual Meeting theme:
"Today and Tomorrow in Pain Medicine Innovation and Practical Applications."
This year’s meeting theme is Today and Tomorrow in Pain Medicine: Innovation and Practical Applications. As the leading advocate of multidisciplinary pain care, the meeting sessions and pre-conference education span the full spectrum of interventional, behavioral, and pharmacological treatment of acute and chronic pain.
Proposals should be innovative, interdisciplinary, and relevant to one of the broader categories defined below. Presentations selected for the 2024 meeting will seek to improve the evaluation, diagnosis, and multidisciplinary inter-professional treatment for pain disorders. Methodologies to assess and improve the delivery and practice of evidence-based pain care throughout the healthcare continuum and changing healthcare environment should also be included.
Proposals must include a descriptive element of audience engagement (for example, discussion using case-based scenarios, flipping the curriculum, etc.) On Sunday, March 10, 2024, we will feature our AAPM Members Forum: Sharing Innovation Across Pain Medicine. All sessions will be presented by current AAPM members.
Proposals should focus on, but are not limited to, the following classifications of pain medicine:
INTERVENTIONAL THERAPIES IN PAIN MEDICINE
Examples might include:
· Interdisciplinary pain care.
· Behavioral assessment and patient selection.
· Advances in neuromodulation.
· Minimally invasive procedures.
· Surgical approaches to pain care.
· Ultrasound-guided procedures in pain management.
PHARMACOTHERAPIES
Examples might include:
· Pharmacological approaches to chronic pain, treatment decisions/pathways.
PHYSICAL, BEHAVIORAL, AND COGNITIVE THERAPIES
Examples might include: Case-based sessions or problem-based learning discussions presented by an interdisciplinary panel with active participation of the attendees
· Patient selection, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of chronic pain rehabilitation
programs
INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE
Examples might include:
· Outcomes and delivery models for more traditional programs
· Affecting patients’ quality of life (QOL) with chronic pain by incorporating additional treatment teams such as nutritionists, endocrinologists, etc.
· Holistic and/or self-directed patient care.
IMAGING & DIAGNOSTIC SCIENCES
Examples might include:
· Diagnosis and treatment planning
· Image to guide treatment and procedures.
· Newer technology used for evaluation or outcomes (e.g. fMRI)
· Sessions such as radiologic interpretations and needle placement views.
· Other diagnostic modalities.
PRACTICE MANAGEMENT
Examples might include:
· Impact of external factors on patient care, such as regulatory, fiscal, legal, and ethical.
· Interaction with insurers, Workers' Compensation issues, etc.
· Novel, web-based pathways to assist with decision-making and/or measuring outcomes.
· CDC Opioid Prescribing Guidelines and how they impact practice and patient care.
· Malpractice cases - a panel might include a clinician as an expert and a lawyer.
· Epidemiology with applications to public health and policy.
· Planning for and implementing value-based pain medicine care.
PAIN CARE FOR SPECIAL POPULATIONS
Examples might include: (bullets)
· Treatments in providing pain care to those patients with physical or mental disabilities, with limited English proficiency, institutionalized individuals, the elderly, children, those from diverse cultures, the transportation-disadvantaged, those who are geographically or culturally isolated or medically/chemically dependent, those who are homeless, among others.
EDUCATING & TRAINING IN PAIN MEDICINE
Examples might include:
· Pain education at all career levels from medical school to post-graduate level.
PRO/CON DEBATE
Examples might include:
· Panelists may choose amongst contemporary topics related to pain medicine
· Example: Neuromodulation Mega session. Hour one is didactic and 2nd hour is pro/con debate.
TRANSLATIONAL & BASIC SCIENCE
Examples might include:
· “Bench to bedside.”
· Current pathways for treatment of specific problems that lead to greatest success
· How your pathways differ from current pathways (provide data to support your outcomes)
· Case Studies with non-optimal decisions/poor outcomes that discuss better, more appropriate interventions/treatments.
· Methodologies in research.
Submission Instructions
Education Session Proposals for this call can be submitted through August 22 at 11:59 p.m. EDT. Your proposal will automatically be sent to the AAPM education department office after you have completed allforms and clicked the "SUBMIT NOW for review" button. Hardcopy proposals will not be accepted.
As you draft your proposal, please consider brevity when choosing session titles. Create ENGAGING presentation titles and publication descriptions. AAPM strongly recommends that all these entries be compelling and/or provocative.
Acceptance and rejection notices will be sent to all submitters mid-September 2023.
Note that sessions will be presented in 60 and 120—minute blocks. The Annual Meeting Planning Committee reserves the right to combine related sessions.
Please complete all information requested on the electronic submission form, including the following:
· Session Title. Your session title should be short yet descriptive and attract attendee interest. There is a 125 maximum character limit.
· Submitter/Moderator's Presentation Title. This is the presentation title you will provide within this session. You will also provide presentation titles for additional faculty later in this submission process. There is a 40-maximum word limit.
· Classification. Choose one from the following based on the descriptions provided above:
o Interventional Therapies
o Pharmacotherapies
o Physical, Behavioral, and Cognitive Therapies
o Integrative and Transdisciplinary Care
o Imaging & Diagnostic Sciences
o Practice Management
o Pain Treatment for Special Patient Populations
o Educating & Training in Pain Medicine
o Translational & Basic Science
· Citations/Literary References. List 3 COMPLETE literature references in support of all clinical or practice management recommendations. (Minimum of three COMPLETE references from within the past 10 years are required.)
· Off-Label Use. Indicate if off-label use of a drug or product will be addressed in this session.
· Professional Practice Gap. Include 3-5 sentences stating the Professional Practice Gap your proposal aims to address. Please note that this gap is “the difference between health care processes or outcomesobserved in practice, and those potentially achievable on the basis of current professional knowledge.” (Maximum 100 words)
· Needs assessment. State the educational need (in terms of knowledge, competence, or performance) that you determined to be the cause of the professional practice gap(s) in the previous question. Explain how this proposal will aim to narrow the gap between 'current practice' and 'optimal practice.' Your proposal must demonstrate increased knowledge and/or competence and/or performance. (Maximum 50 words in each category)
· Expected outcomes. Include 1-2 sentences stating what this program is designed to change regarding learners’ competence or performance or patient outcomes. (maximum 100 words)
· Educational learning objectives**. List 3 key measurable learning objectives designed to change competence, performance, or patient outcomes. Attendees will rate your session based on how well you and your co-faculty meet your objectives. This document will provide assistance in choosing verbs for use in formulating measurable objectives. (Minimum of three objectives are required.) (maximum 50 words per objective)
· Proposal text body. Abstracts should be no more than 350 words and describe the content of your presentation. Do not include session or presentation titles, moderators, or faculty, as this information will be entered based on other fields in the submission process. Important note: Be sure to include a descriptive element of audience engagement at the end of this field (for example, a discussion using case-basedscenarios or a web-based audience response system.)
· Session publication description. Enter how you would like your session description to appear in all AAPMpublications if your proposal is accepted. This description should be 50 words or less. Please check spelling and word count before entering proposal text.
· Relevant Financial Relationships. All submitter/moderators and faculty are required to disclose their relevant financial relationships (any amount occurring within the past 12 months that creates a conflict of interest.) As an ACCME-accredited provider, AAPM considers financial relationships to create actual conflicts of interest in CME when individuals have a financial relationship with a commercial interest and the opportunity to affect the content of CME about the products or services of that commercial interest. The submitter will disclose this information to submit the proposal. Identified co-faculty will receive emails requesting disclosure information by the deadline proposal submission date. Follow up with your faculty to ensure that they complete this requirement. An individual who refuses to disclose relevant financial relationships will be disqualified frombeing a planning committee member, a teacher, or an author of CME, and cannot have control of, or responsibility for, the development, management, presentation or evaluation of the CME activity.
· Faculty. As the submitter, you will serve as the session’s moderator and presenter. Do not add additional faculty within other fields to this proposal. Each presentation title has a maximum 40-word limit. Please note: AAPM education session proposals cannot be initiated by members of industry. Moderators and faculty must not receive support from industry for participation in the proposed submission.