The People’s Notice and Demand to Dover Public Officials and other New Hampshire State Officials, to provide good faith fulfillment of their sworn oath to not interfere with the guaranteed Right of Privacy, and to immediately cease and desist contracting with minors for sex by way of implied contract or any other, amongst other matters:
C/O:
The Town of Dover, Dover Public Schools, Department of Education
New Hampshire House Representatives:
Nikki McCarter
John Sellers
Leah Cushman
Kelley Potenza
Emily Phillips
Diane Kelley
Claudine Burnham
Michael Belcher
Michael Granger
Barbara Comtois
Paul Terry
Jason Gerhard
Tom Mannion
Aidan Ankarberg
Glenn Bailey
David Bickford
James Connor
Michael Harrington
Jim Horgan
Tom Kaczynski
Cliff Newton
Brandon Phinney
Joe Pitre
Len Turcotte
Alicia Lekas
Rick Ladd
Glenn Cordelli
Arlene Quaratiello
Oliver Ford
Margaret Drye
Valerie McDonnell
Kristin Noble
Katy Peternel
Sandra Panek
Sheila Seidel
Lorie Ball
Charles McMahon
Jodi Nelson
Debra DeSimone
Mark Pearson
Jim Kofalt
J.R. Hoell
Deb Hobson
Scott Wallace
JD Bernardy
Susan Porcelli
Terry Roy
Jennifer Rhodes
Lisa Smart
David Love
Kevin Pratt
Mike Drago
Kristine Perez
Lisa Mazur
Karen Reid
Shane Sirois
_____________________________________________________
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, ___________________________, One of The People as seen in the New Hampshire State Constitution, Sui Juris, do now provide you this notice that you may provide due care to prevent trespass of the guaranteed rights you promised to provide to me when you accepted the Trust swearing oath before God according to NH Constitution Pt 2 Art 84.
You (government officials) agreed, promised, and swore oath before God, that I have authority to give you instructions as seen in the first part before the “and,” of NH Constitution Part 1 Article 32. The Maxims of Law say that Good Faith is required when oaths are given and that failure to do so is punishable in law. See evidence below:
Maxim 50c. “Good faith demands that what is agreed upon shall be done.” Dig 19, 20, 21; Id. 19, 1, 50; Id. 50, 8, 2, 13.
Maxim 84c. “Punishment is due if the words of an oath be false.” Black’s, 840.
Maxim 84j. “To swear is to call God to witness and is an act of religion.” 3 Inst. 165; Cycl. Diet 566.
Maxim 49l. “That which is against Divine Law is repugnant to society and void.” C.L.M.
Maxim 51b. “The government is to be subject to the law, for the law makes the government.” C.L.M.
Maxim 51c. “Obedience makes the government, not the name by which it is called.” C.L.M.
Please take notice: You swore to be my agent, as seen in NH Constitution Part 1 Art 8.
Maxim 4d. “An agent is a person authorized by another to act on his account and under his control.” Wasilowski v Park Bridge Corp., 156 F. 2d 612, 614.
Please take notice: The terms of the Express Trust, which my Trustees are currently violating and breaching trust on, are seen in New Hampshire Constitution Part 1 Articles 1-10, 12, 12a, 14, 19, 23, 28, 28a, 29, 30, 32, 33, and 38. We will be instructing our Trustees to form various special action committees to look into the specifics of these breaches that we will elaborate on at that time.
Please take notice: I am aware of the recent SCOTUS decision of NY State Rifle & Pistol Assoc Inc. v Bruen, wherein the Justices ruled according to the historical analogy method, comparing the controversy before them to the customs and usages at the time of the writing of the original law. I am also aware that the customs and usages of the time of writing of the NH State Constitution were ones where oaths were made to the Christian God. This is evidenced by the original NH State Constitution declaring that people were ineligible for the office of Governor if they were not Protestant Christians, by the original language of Part 1 Article 6, and by the Vermont Constitution, which to this day declares in Part 1 Article 3 “....Nevertheless, every sect or denomination of christians ought to observe the sabbath or Lord’s Day….” Therefore, any potential court actions relating to these matters in the near future will be pled with the understanding that historical analogy is once again respected and expected in the land.
Please take notice: All government agents swore oath to uphold the paradigm which the constitution frames, (see Wooster v Plymouth) wherein the first part is a bill of rights, reserved back to the people, and exempting themselves from the various grants of authority made to the public government set forth in part 2. In part one, we reserved back to ourselves Part 1 Articles 2 and 2b. These articles reserve our guaranteed right to raise our private families in a private fashion regarding the most intimate of private affairs, such as sexuality and private body parts of the private people. Government officials break law and violate their oaths when they pierce this privacy by forcing or allowing public education materials into the public stream which contradict our individual guaranteed rights to keep these aspects of our children's lives private. In many cases, a further conflict arises when these materials conflict with our conscience and religious beliefs. Mason’s Manual of Legislative Procedure has already established that the constitution stands on a higher plane than statute and, as a rule, is mandatory. So, no public official internal debates over RSA’s may be allowed to stand as excuses for not keeping the oath (which precedes any RSA’s) that you already swore to protect our guaranteed Bill of Rights. Should any private families wish to instruct their children at home with materials that are repugnant to the Judeo-Christian faith, they can do so without interfering with the common rights guaranteed to all. Conversely, families wishing for this information to emanate from the home only, are automatically infringed and violated when public officials exceed their grant of authority to begin instructing the private children of private people in this most intimate of private affairs inside of a public setting. Therefore:
Please take notice: The following are my constitutionally sound instructions which you are bound by oath to follow unless you can prove by way of sworn affidavit that I have misconstrued the law of New Hampshire or the Maxims of Law:
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the above named New Hampshire House Representatives share this notice to other supportive representatives and senators and provide proof of such within 48 hours from receipt of this notice. House Representatives may be afforded more time to complete this task upon reasonable request. Any House Representatives with questions regarding various next steps may contact Kelley Potenza, Nikki McCarter, or Leah Cushman directly for guidance.
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the same House Representatives issue forth lawful notice to Governor Chris Sununu reminding him of the good faith he is obligated to provide under the power vested in him by New Hampshire Constitution Part 2 Article 41; that he make immediate cease and desist notice available to the public, which restrains the unconstitutional activities of public servants employed in the education department (i.e., use of public office to interfere with the private rights of the people to instruct their private children in intensely intimate private matters such as private sexual body parts and ideas, by distributing pornographic images, stories, literature, technical instructions regarding sexual acts, sexually explicit and obscene materials, etc., to private minor children of the private people of New Hampshire); and further for the Governor to make public notice ordering the Attorney General to initiate lawsuits against any public officials who persist violating the Express Trust of the People. The notice shall state that, should any one of The People provide sworn affidavits against a public official for distributing sexually explicit content to minor children in any public school in the State of New Hampshire, the Attorney General shall act to assist them in securing their guaranteed rights and shall not interfere with the guaranteed right of The People found in the Express Trust at NH Constitution Part 1 Art 14.
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the House Representatives issue notice to the NH Judicial branch, invoking their authority found in NH Constitution Part 2 Article 74, to require of the justices their opinions on whether or not any public officials were granted authority in the trust indenture contract (also known as the New Hampshire State Constitution) to instruct, endorse under color of law, or by any other means distribute pornography, sexually explicit materials or any materials regarding private matters such as how to think of or use their own or others’ private sexual parts. They must further require of the Justices whether they believe that these are private matters, (and as such reserved back to the people in part one of the state constitution as stated by the NH Supreme Court’s previous opinion in the Wooster v Plymouth case) or if there exists anywhere in the State Constitution an authority for any public officials, employees, volunteers, persons, etc., to contract with minor children for sex by way of implied contract or any other.
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the House Representatives review the Wooster v Plymouth case materials I provide them, the Express Trust Indenture, and The Maxims of Law that the people may deem appropriate for research. These materials demonstrate and affirm the people’s grant of authority over all corporate schools, and the representatives’ responsibility to restrain any infringement of The People’s liberty and private rights to privacy of private matters, by any public school, with consequences up to and including the summary abolishment of any school refusing to comply with the intent of the framers of our state constitution to reserve back to the people private rights such as how to educate their own children on how to use their private parts, and exempt themselves (the people) back from the public grant of authority. (See Wooster v Plymouth affirming the power of Legislature to do so.)
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the aforementioned House Representatives initiate a sub or special committee for action to review RSA 571-B:1b to clarify that the standard for review is the historical analogy method of the customs and usages at the time of the writing of the original laws, not the subjective notion of “contemporary adult standards” which currently appears in the RSA. Clarify that in 571-B:2, the term “any person” provides no exemptions since no exemption can be made in law for any public actor to infringe the private rights of the private people, in this case minor children who are private people with no parental supervision while under the supervision of any public actor whether librarian or other. No public official, whether paid, voluntary, etc., may ever infringe the private rights of the private people who reserve the right to themselves to handle the teachings of private matters such as sexual activities, genders, and so on. Clarify that the liberty of the private people to attend to their own private affairs such as the sexual education of their children, is inviolate, and that we the people alone have liberty to decide how our private children should be instructed in these private matters, and that the Maxims of Law state “Whenever the interpretation of liberty is in doubt, the answer should be on the side of liberty.” Please see evidence below:
Maxim 47a. “Whenever the interpretation of liberty is doubt, the answer should be on the side of liberty.” Dig. 50, 17, 20; Co. Litt. 116.
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the House Representatives also issue Official Notice to Frank Edleblut/Department of Education, demanding any documents responding to any evidence of payments for the pornographic/sexually explicit materials currently found in schools, coming from any private associations, any federal programs, any non government entities etc.
Please take notice: Frank Edleblut must immediately issue a memorandum to all public schools and school libraries requiring the removal of all the above discussed materials and provide his proposed memorandum to Kelley Potenza for review before release of said notice.
Please take notice: It is my wish and demand that the House Representatives form an action committee to review their authority over all corporations in the state of New Hampshire, to include towns. That they review the various materials I provide them, from Wooster v Plymouth and other sources, affirming that The People delegated to Legislature the duty to restrain all corporate policy in conflict with the Liberties that The People reserved back to themselves in Part 1 of the New Hampshire State Constitution. That the House Reps then take appropriate actions to compel an abolishing of Resolution 2023.06.14 of the Town of Dover for its gross attacks on the people’s liberty interests and the state constitution where the people reserve private rights back to themselves, such as the private right to exclusively educate their private children as they see fit in the private matters of sexuality etc. Further, restrain the town of Dover in its gross misunderstanding of law for stating in their resolution, contrary to the trusts they swore oath to uphold, that public officials have license to infringe the liberty of parents to privacy of sexual education of their own private children. By claiming that public officials are granted authority anywhere in the trust to exercise the free speech rights which they surrender while on duty in the public trust known as public schools, can be used to distribute materials to minor children under the guise of free speech is a blatant breach of trust that their grantors place in them and any such offenses persisting from the time of the receipt of this Common Law Notice by the House Representatives, shall be punishable offenses.
The House Representative Action Committee should take measures to dispel the myth that there is any grant of authority found anywhere in the state constitution for public officials to infringe upon the liberty of parents who are the people of New Hampshire, the Grantors of the Trust, and are exclusively responsible to privately secure the sexual education of their private children.
The committee shall dispel the myth that public schools are the press or private people. Free Speech is a private right, not to be confused with public duties. Public officials have rights to free speech when they are in their private capacities, not when they are in their duties as trustees and agents of The People.
The action committee shall dispel the myth appearing in the Dover Resolution, that any state in this union is a democracy. US Constitution Article 4 Section 4 guarantees a Republican Form of Government and as such it is unlawful for tax dollars to be spent printing, or promoting, falsehoods that public officials state publicly, such as that we are a democratic form of government.
The action committee shall clarify for all subdivisions, that it is not unconstitutional for the private people to insist that their private rights be reserved back to themselves as the layout of the state constitution clearly expresses (See Wooster v Plymouth).
The committee shall send public notice reminding and inviting all inhabitants of the state of New Hampshire to send Common Law Notice and/or sworn affidavits attesting to any infringements to the committee, invoking the people’s guaranteed right to require of their magistrates an exact and constant observance of the law for good administration, and a reminder that the senate shall be a court to impeach all cases of maladministration by any state official. See evidence below:
New Hampshire Constitution Part 1 Article 38 [Social Virtues Inculcated.] A frequent recurrence to the fundamental principles of the constitution, and a constant adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, industry, frugality, and all the social virtues, are indispensably necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty and good government; the people ought, therefore, to have a particular regard to all those principles in the choice of their officers and representatives, and they have a right to require of their lawgivers and magistrates, an exact and constant observance of them, in the formation and execution of the laws necessary for the good administration of government.
June 2, 1784
My Final Wish and Demand: If you believe you have been granted authority anywhere in the State Constitution to block my guaranteed rights, or that any of the foregoing statements in this Notice are untrue, rebut them point-by-point by sworn affidavit under penalty of perjury within 7 business days. Send affidavit by certified mail to NH House Representative Kelley Potenza at the State House. If you should fail to respond with Constitutional authority showing how you can block or infringe Constitutionally guaranteed rights, you agree, by acquiescence, that you are bound to execute my instructions and you further agree that this Notice shall stand as evidence, truth, fact, and law in all courts of record should you fail to respond in the allotted time. Remedy can be availed by the Town of Dover immediately rescinding its Resolution 2023.06.14, removing all challenged books from the school premises, and providing evidence of such to NH House Rep Kelley Potenza by way of official notice on the Town Letterhead.