Notice and Demand to Acknowledge Justice Gorsuch’s Admission of Unlawful Tribunals used against the People with Lack of Impartial Judges

I, One of the People (as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), do present you with the following notice that you may provide immediate due care:

Please take notice that Bar Association members, bureaucrats and agencies have been using unlawful tribunals (under the guise of being courts) to act as judges in cases where the same hearing officer benefits;

Please take notice that these tribunals failed to allow judges to act as they would in courts of record where they would give constitutional due process. Evidence of what Gorsuch had to say in his dissent on November 7, 2022 (See attached pg. 9 of Gorsuch Opinion) is an admission of the wrongs done to the People in many cases involved in federal programs where States, the Federal and Political Subdivisions are being given financial benefits from the same cases they are all taking part in while disregarding fundamental rights of the People. This notice is given to you that you may look deeper into this occurrence as a Trustee and Servant of the People.

Please take notice that any CPS, Child Support Enforcement, Highway Safety Act, or other agency that held tribunals attacking the rights of the People are unlawful. The People are aware and demand that the Federal Legislature and Supreme Court acknowledge the same above statement. Should there be any further actions or participation in any legislative or executive branch tribunals, it will be understood that you are taking part with full knowledge, malice and understanding, by the People.

Attached Instrument: Page 9

1 Cite as: 598 U. S. ____ (2022)

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
THOMAS H. BUFFINGTON v. DENIS R. MCDONOUGH,
SECRETARY OF VETERAN AFFAIRS
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
No. 21–972. Decided November 7, 2022

 9

Cite as: 598 U. S. ____ (2022)

 

…..the APA and our longstanding and never-overruled prece­dent. It also turns out to pose a serious threat to some of our most fundamental commitments as judges and courts.

In this country, we like to boast that persons who come to court are entitled to have independent judges, not politi­cally motivated actors, resolve their rights and duties under law. Here, we promise, individuals may appeal to neutral magistrates to resolve their disputes about “what the law is.” Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177 (1803). Every­one, we say, is entitled to a judicial decision “without re­spect to persons,” 28 U. S. C. §453, and a “fair trial in a fair tribunal,” In re Murchison, 349 U. S. 133, 136 (1955).

Under a broad reading of Chevron, however, courts often fail to deliver on all these promises. Rather than provide individuals with the best understanding of their rights and duties under law a neutral magistrate can muster, we out­source our interpretive responsibilities. Rather than say what the law is, we tell those who come before us to go ask a bureaucrat. In the process, we introduce into judicial pro­ceedings a “systematic bias toward one of the parties.” P. Hamburger, Chevron Bias, 84 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1187, 1212 (2016). Nor do we exhibit bias in favor of just any party. We place a finger on the scales of justice in favor of the most powerful of litigants, the federal government, and against everyone else. In these ways, a maximalist account of Chevron risks turning Marbury on its head.

Overreading Chevron introduces still other incongruities into our law. Often we insist that it is a basic requirement of due process that “‘no man can be a judge in his own case.’” Williams v. Pennsylvania, 579 U. S. 1, 8–9 (2016). As far back as Calder v. Bull, 3 Dall. 386 (1798), this Court recognized that it would be “against all reason” to “entrust a Legislature” with the power to “mak[e] a man a Judge in his own cause,” and therefore “it cannot be presumed that[the people] have done it,” id., at 388 (opinion of Chase, J.)

Please be patient with this form. There may be a longer than usual delay submitting (upwards of 1+ minutes).

Apologies for the delay!

To	State Governors		To	Congressman Jim Jordan
To	State Attorney Generals		To	Speaker Mike Johnson
To	State Senate President		To	United States Supreme Court
To	State House Speaker

 We have majority of email addresses for State Actors listed above but not all.

Total recipients: 206