You can always press Enter⏎ to continue
BREW AWARDS JUDGE'S ORIENTATION AND EOI FORM

BREW AWARDS JUDGE'S ORIENTATION AND EOI FORM

Hello! Click "Start" if you've landed on the right page.
21Questions
  • 1

    WELCOME

    The Chrysalis BREW Project welcomes you, our potential judge for the current judging round of the BREW Book, Blog, and Poetry Awards. Your interest in contributing your expertise and insight to our esteemed panel of judges is truly appreciated. As a judge for the awards, you will play a crucial role in recognizing and honoring exceptional achievements across various categories of the book, blog, and poetry realm. Your expertise and discernment will help ensure that only the most deserving nominees receive recognition for their outstanding contributions.

    Click the "Next" button for more details. 

    Press
    Enter
  • 2

    SCOPE

    Before we begin, we will like to cover the following for your benefit:

    1. Introduction to the awards

    2. Criteria for selecting an awards judge

    3. Benefits of being an awards judge

    4. The role of a judge

    5. Summary of the judging process

    6. Further details

    7. Signing up

    Press
    Enter
  • 3

    INTRODUCTION TO THE AWARDS

    With great pride, The Chrysalis Books, Reviews, and Everything Written (BREW) Project presents the BREW Book, Blog, and Poetry Awards. The depth of human expression is honored by the awards. Originating from a love of narrative and a conviction in the transformational potential of content, these accolades have developed into a distinguished venue for writers, publishers, bloggers, poets, and other content creators to exhibit their abilities and establish connections with readers around the world.

    The core of the awards—Books, Reflections, and Expressions of Words—may also be embodied by the abbreviation BREW. It represents the variety of subtle flavors that content can have, like the awakening sensation of a perfectly prepared cup of coffee or tea. In three diverse categories—fiction and non-fiction, reflection and observation, and rhythmic poetry that captures the essence of the human experience—the BREW Awards seek to identify and acknowledge exceptional achievements.

    For more details about the awards, here's the link: https://thechrysalisbrewproject.com/the-brew-awards/. 

    Press
    Enter
  • 4

    CRITERIA FOR SELECTING A JUDGE

    Judges' involvement is crucial in ensuring the integrity and credibility of our awards process. To ensure that we select judges who can uphold these values, we carefully consider the following criteria:

    1. Expertise and Experience: We seek judges who possess significant expertise, knowledge, and experience in their respective fields or industries relevant to the award categories. Your deep understanding of industry standards, best practices, and emerging trends is invaluable.

    2. Credibility and Reputation: Your reputation and credibility within your professional community are essential. We look for judges who are recognized as leaders or authorities in their field, with a track record of achievements and contributions that demonstrate their expertise and integrity.

    3. Impartiality and Objectivity: As a judge, it's important to be impartial and objective in your evaluations, free from any conflicts of interest or bias. We rely on judges who can evaluate nominees based solely on the merits of their achievements, without personal or professional biases influencing their decisions.

    4. Diversity and Inclusivity: We strive to ensure diversity and inclusivity among our judges, representing a range of backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences. Your unique viewpoint will enrich the evaluation process and help mitigate the risk of bias.

    5. Commitment and Availability: Your commitment to fulfilling your responsibilities diligently and promptly is crucial. We need judges who are available to review nominations, participate in additional judging activities if warranted, and adhere to the established timeline and deadlines. Ideally, a judge must be able to commit to assess at least one (1) nomination in a given award year. However, participation in a given award judging round is voluntary.  If there are more nominations to allocate than available judges, some judges may be requested to assess more than the usual number of allocated nominations but they always have the option to decline if not able to do so.

    6. Integrity and Professionalism: We expect judges to demonstrate integrity, professionalism, and ethical conduct at all times. Your honesty, fairness, and transparency will help maintain the integrity and credibility of our awards process.

    7. Communication and Collaboration: Strong communication and collaboration skills are essential for effective interaction with other judges, organizers, and nominees. Your ability to articulate evaluations clearly and constructively, and collaborate with others to reach consensus decisions, is highly valued.

    8. Conflict of Interest: A judge cannot be nominated for any award category that they or their work are nominated for the year. If there are potential or perceived conflicts of interest, judges are required to notify us about such, so that they can be excluded from judging on the said award category on that year.

    Press
    Enter
  • 5

    BENEFITS OF BEING AN AWARD JUDGE

    Becoming a judge for the awards is not only an opportunity to contribute to the recognition of excellence but also a rewarding experience with numerous benefits, which include the following among others:

    1. No Fees Charged: Unlike other awards programs that may require organizational or judging fees, there are no fees charged to participate as a judge for the awards. This ensures that your involvement is solely based on your expertise and contribution to the judging process.

    2. Recognition and Visibility: We currently do not publish our judges' identity. However, if in case our plan to change that policy pushes through, your participation as a judge will be acknowledged and celebrated through the planned publication of judges' details on the website. Your profile will remain on the site for as long as you wish, providing ongoing recognition for your expertise and service to the industry. We will let you know should we decide to publish judges' names in the future. 

    3. Service to the Industry: Serving as a judge allows you to give back to your industry by contributing your knowledge, insights, and expertise to recognize and celebrate excellence. Your role in evaluating nominees helps uphold industry standards and promotes innovation and best practices.

    4. Widening of Insights and Knowledge: Judging provides an opportunity to deepen your understanding of industry trends, advancements, and emerging practices. By evaluating a diverse range of nominees, you gain valuable insights into the latest developments and innovations in your field.

    5. Networking Opportunities: Engaging with fellow judges, organizers, and industry professionals during the judging process offers valuable networking opportunities. You have the chance to connect with like-minded individuals, forge new relationships, and expand your professional network.

    6. Additional Credential: Serving as a judge for prestigious awards enhances your professional credentials and reputation within your industry. It demonstrates your expertise, leadership, and commitment to excellence, further establishing you as a respected authority in your field.

    7. Professional Development: Serving as a judge provides an opportunity for personal and professional growth. By evaluating nominees, providing feedback, and engaging in discussions with fellow judges, you can enhance your analytical skills, critical thinking abilities, and decision-making prowess.

    8. Access to Exclusive Content: As a judge, you may gain access to exclusive content and insights related to the nominees and their achievements. This behind-the-scenes access allows you to stay informed about the latest developments and innovations in your industry, giving you a competitive edge.

    9. Influence and Impact: Your role as a judge allows you to have a direct impact on the recognition and celebration of excellence within your industry. By participating in the judging process, you help shape the narrative around industry achievements and contribute to the promotion of best practices and innovation.

    10. Personal Satisfaction: Serving as a judge can be personally fulfilling and rewarding. The opportunity to play a part in recognizing and honoring outstanding achievements can instill a sense of pride and satisfaction, knowing that you have contributed to the advancement and success of your industry.

    11. Professional Visibility: Your involvement as a judge may enhance your professional visibility and reputation within your industry. Being associated with prestigious awards programs like our awards can elevate your profile and position you as a thought leader and influencer in your field.

    12. Gratitude and Appreciation: Your participation as a judge is valued and appreciated by the organizers, nominees, and the broader industry community. Your dedication and commitment to the judging process are recognized and celebrated, further reinforcing your sense of belonging and contribution to the industry. Judges who have assessed one (1) award nomination in a given award round will receive a Certificate of Appreciation.

    Press
    Enter
  • 6

    THE ROLE OF AN AWARDS JUDGE

    The role of a judge for the awards is both prestigious and pivotal, carrying significant responsibility in the recognition and celebration of excellence across various industries and domains. Judges play a crucial role in upholding the integrity, credibility, and fairness of the awards process, ensuring that only the most deserving candidates receive recognition for their outstanding achievements.

    As a judge, one must possess a high level of expertise, knowledge, and credibility in their respective field or industry. Judges are typically selected based on their extensive experience, qualifications, and achievements, ensuring that they bring valuable insights and perspectives to the evaluation process.

    The primary responsibilities of a judge include:

    1. Evaluation of Nominees: Judges are tasked with carefully reviewing and evaluating the nominations submitted for the awards. This involves assessing the merits, achievements, and impact of each nominee against specific criteria and standards of excellence as well as coming up with a judging score thereafter. 

    2. Selection of Finalists and Winners: Based on the scores they'd give nominations, judges play a crucial role in selecting the finalists and winners for each award category. This decision-making process requires careful consideration, objectivity, and impartiality to ensure that the most deserving candidates are recognized.

    3. Upholding Integrity, Fairness, and Confidentiality: Judges are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity, fairness, and impartiality throughout the awards process. They must avoid any conflicts of interest or bias and make decisions based solely on the merits of the nominees. Judges also expected to uphold privacy and confidentiality principles before, during, and even after the judging process. 

    4. Providing Feedback: Judges may also have the opportunity to provide constructive feedback to nominees, offering valuable insights and recommendations for improvement. This feedback can help nominees understand their strengths and areas for growth, contributing to their ongoing development and success.

    Overall, the role of a judge for the awards is both an honor and a responsibility, requiring dedication, expertise, and a commitment to excellence. Judges play a crucial role in identifying and celebrating the best of the best, ensuring that exceptional achievements are duly recognized and honored on a global scale.

     

    Press
    Enter
  • 7

    SUMMARY OF THE JUDGING PROCESS

    Here is a brief summary of the judging process:

    1. Email Notification: Judges will receive an email containing details and write-ups/entries of nominees in their assigned categories.

    2. Evaluation: Judges will carefully review each nominee's entry and score them using the provided evaluation form. They will assess the nominees based on predetermined criteria relevant to their category. Conduct additional research, if and as necessary. 

    3. Shortlisting: A nominee requires a passing score from at least two judges to be shortlisted for the final round. This ensures a fair and comprehensive evaluation process.

    4. Tie-Breaking: In the event of a tie for the top spot, judges may be invited to evaluate an additional entry to determine the winner. This ensures that the most deserving nominee receives recognition.

    Overall, the judging process is structured to ensure fairness, transparency, and thorough evaluation of nominees, ultimately leading to the recognition of excellence across various categories in the awards. 

    Press
    Enter
  • 8

    FURTHER DETAILS

    For questions, issues, concerns, or ideas about the awards, contact us via info@theworldsbestmagazine.com.

    Press
    Enter
  • 9
    Press
    Enter
  • 10
    Press
    Enter
  • 11
    Press
    Enter
  • 12
    Email Verified

    The verification code has been sent to some@email.com
    Please check your mailbox and paste the code below to complete verification

    Didn't receive verification code?or
    Receiving the email may take a few minutes, thank you for your patience!
    Press
    Enter
  • 13
    Please Select
    • Please Select
    • Afghanistan
    • Albania
    • Algeria
    • American Samoa
    • Andorra
    • Angola
    • Anguilla
    • Antigua and Barbuda
    • Argentina
    • Armenia
    • Aruba
    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Azerbaijan
    • The Bahamas
    • Bahrain
    • Bangladesh
    • Barbados
    • Belarus
    • Belgium
    • Belize
    • Benin
    • Bermuda
    • Bhutan
    • Bolivia
    • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    • Botswana
    • Brazil
    • Brunei
    • Bulgaria
    • Burkina Faso
    • Burundi
    • Cambodia
    • Cameroon
    • Canada
    • Cape Verde
    • Cayman Islands
    • Central African Republic
    • Chad
    • Chile
    • China
    • Christmas Island
    • Cocos (Keeling) Islands
    • Colombia
    • Comoros
    • Congo
    • Cook Islands
    • Costa Rica
    • Cote d'Ivoire
    • Croatia
    • Cuba
    • Curaçao
    • Cyprus
    • Czech Republic
    • Democratic Republic of the Congo
    • Denmark
    • Djibouti
    • Dominica
    • Dominican Republic
    • Ecuador
    • Egypt
    • El Salvador
    • Equatorial Guinea
    • Eritrea
    • Estonia
    • Ethiopia
    • Falkland Islands
    • Faroe Islands
    • Fiji
    • Finland
    • France
    • French Polynesia
    • Gabon
    • The Gambia
    • Georgia
    • Germany
    • Ghana
    • Gibraltar
    • Greece
    • Greenland
    • Grenada
    • Guadeloupe
    • Guam
    • Guatemala
    • Guernsey
    • Guinea
    • Guinea-Bissau
    • Guyana
    • Haiti
    • Honduras
    • Hong Kong
    • Hungary
    • Iceland
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Iran
    • Iraq
    • Ireland
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Jamaica
    • Japan
    • Jersey
    • Jordan
    • Kazakhstan
    • Kenya
    • Kiribati
    • North Korea
    • South Korea
    • Kosovo
    • Kuwait
    • Kyrgyzstan
    • Laos
    • Latvia
    • Lebanon
    • Lesotho
    • Liberia
    • Libya
    • Liechtenstein
    • Lithuania
    • Luxembourg
    • Macau
    • Macedonia
    • Madagascar
    • Malawi
    • Malaysia
    • Maldives
    • Mali
    • Malta
    • Marshall Islands
    • Martinique
    • Mauritania
    • Mauritius
    • Mayotte
    • Mexico
    • Micronesia
    • Moldova
    • Monaco
    • Mongolia
    • Montenegro
    • Montserrat
    • Morocco
    • Mozambique
    • Myanmar
    • Nagorno-Karabakh
    • Namibia
    • Nauru
    • Nepal
    • Netherlands
    • Netherlands Antilles
    • New Caledonia
    • New Zealand
    • Nicaragua
    • Niger
    • Nigeria
    • Niue
    • Norfolk Island
    • Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
    • Northern Mariana
    • Norway
    • Oman
    • Pakistan
    • Palau
    • Palestine
    • Panama
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Paraguay
    • Peru
    • Philippines
    • Pitcairn Islands
    • Poland
    • Portugal
    • Puerto Rico
    • Qatar
    • Republic of the Congo
    • Romania
    • Russia
    • Rwanda
    • Saint Barthelemy
    • Saint Helena
    • Saint Kitts and Nevis
    • Saint Lucia
    • Saint Martin
    • Saint Pierre and Miquelon
    • Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
    • Samoa
    • San Marino
    • Sao Tome and Principe
    • Saudi Arabia
    • Senegal
    • Serbia
    • Seychelles
    • Sierra Leone
    • Singapore
    • Slovakia
    • Slovenia
    • Solomon Islands
    • Somalia
    • Somaliland
    • South Africa
    • South Ossetia
    • South Sudan
    • Spain
    • Sri Lanka
    • Sudan
    • Suriname
    • Svalbard
    • eSwatini
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
    • Syria
    • Taiwan
    • Tajikistan
    • Tanzania
    • Thailand
    • Timor-Leste
    • Togo
    • Tokelau
    • Tonga
    • Transnistria Pridnestrovie
    • Trinidad and Tobago
    • Tristan da Cunha
    • Tunisia
    • Turkey
    • Turkmenistan
    • Turks and Caicos Islands
    • Tuvalu
    • Uganda
    • Ukraine
    • United Arab Emirates
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • Uruguay
    • Uzbekistan
    • Vanuatu
    • Vatican City
    • Venezuela
    • Vietnam
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Isle of Man
    • US Virgin Islands
    • Wallis and Futuna
    • Western Sahara
    • Yemen
    • Zambia
    • Zimbabwe
    • Other
    Press
    Enter
  • 14
    Press
    Enter
  • 15
    Drag and drop files here
    Select files to upload
    Max. file size: 1.0MB
    Cancelof
    Press
    Enter
  • 16
    • Huge
    • Large
    • Normal
    • Small
    Ok
    quoteCreated with Sketch.
    Ok
    Press
    Enter
  • 17
    Press
    Enter
  • 18
    Press
    Enter
  • 19
    • Huge
    • Large
    • Normal
    • Small
    Ok
    quoteCreated with Sketch.
    Ok
    Press
    Enter
  • 20
    Press
    Enter
  • 21
    -
    Pick a Date
    Press
    Enter
  • Should be Empty:
Question Label
1 of 21See AllGo Back
close