Staff Performance Review
Name
First Name
Last Name
Office Location
Job Title
Start Date
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Evaluation Period
Please Select
90 days
6 months
1 year
1 1/2 years
2 years
3 years
4 years
5 years
Last Evaluation
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Job Knowledge (knowledge of duties and responsibilities of position)
Poor-unable to complete job duties, poor understanding of job
Less than Satisfactory-lacks knowledge of some phases of work
Satisfactory-adequate understanding of job requirements
Very Good-understands ALL phases of work
Superior-completely mastered all aspects of job, strives to learn moreand improve job skills
Areas of improvement:
Quality (accuracy, completeness, andcorrectness)
Poor-frequentand recurrent errors; does NOT understand job requirements
Less than Satisfactory-makes above average number of errors
Satisfactory-usually accurate, makes minimum number of mistakes
Very Good-requires little supervision, seldom makes errors, precise most of the time
Superior-requires minimum supervision, consistently thorough and accurate
Areas of improvement:
Quantity of Work (amount of work done during workday)
Poor-minimum requirements not met
Less than Satisfactory-volume of work is generally below expectation
Satisfactory-volume of work meets job requirements
Very Good-volume of work frequently above expectations
Superior-produces consistently high volume of work, extremely productive
Comments:
Responsibility and Dependability (willingness to take onassignments and be held accountable)
Poor-unreliable, requires close supervision, does NOT accept responsibility
Less than Satisfactory-frequently requires prompting, often fails to meet deadlines
Satisfactory-usually takes care of necessary tasks and completes them with reasonable promptness
Very Good-reliable, requires little supervision, completes tasks effectively
Superior-requires minimum supervision, very reliable, seeks additional responsibility
Areas of improvement:
Attendance and Punctuality (timely attendance, works expected hours)
Poor-absent often, frequently late, chronic offender
Less than satisfactory-lax in attendance or reporting on time
Satisfactory-usually present and on time, generally reliable
Very Good-very prompt, shows responsibility toward regular attendance
Superior-excellent attendance and promptness, always dependable
Number of days late
Number of days absent
Comments:
Interpersonal Relations (communication and cooperation with fellow employees)
Poor-fails to consider others, not courteous, lacks understanding
Less than Satisfactory-sometimes rigid and defensive, does not foster good working environment
Satisfactory-adapts well to others and to most situations, seeks guidance when needed
Very Good-effectively handles difficult interpersonal relations
Superior-goes out of way to promote good interpersonal relations, very cooperative
Comments:
Effective Use of Time (ability to organize, prioritizeand schedule)
Poor-ineffective in routine tasks, cannot plan or schedule
Less than Satisfactory-difficulty determining priority and schedule of duties
Satisfactory-completes assignments within time expected, meets deadlines
Very Good-plans skillfully, handles unusual situations/schedules effectively
Superior-extremely capable coordinating tasks in changing situations
Areas of improvement:
Initiative (origination and development of vital job procedures)
Poor-unwilling to demonstrate interest in gaining new knowledge
Less than Satisfactory-shows little interest in current work related practices
Satisfactory-follows formal instruction as necessary
Very Good-seek additional knowledge pertaining to job functions/responsibilities
Superior-develops new ideas and methods to improve qualityresults
Comments:
Corrective Action Record
If No, provide details:
Total points on last evaluation
Total points on this evaluation
Mutually understood goals:
Employee Comments:
Manager Signature
Date
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Employee Signature
Date
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Continue
Should be Empty: