To: Enrico (Rick) Capogrossa, Dean Seaberg, D. Michael Nettleton, Kelly Livermore, Mickey Rondeau, Alger County Board of Commissioners; Todd Brock, Sheriff

Notice of Private Rights Violation and Impairment of Constitutional Contract by Alger County Board of Commissioners and Sheriff

Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent

I,_________________one of the People as seen in the Michigan Constitution Article I, Section 1, republican in form, Sui Juris, do serve this notice that you and your agents may take due care;

Please take notice that all government workers are mere trustees and servants of the sovereign people; and no inferior law, rule, regulation, qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice or procedure derivative of the people's government can supercede the express terms in the state and federal constitutions, to which you are legally bound. (see evidence below):

Vermont Constitution Declaration of Rights, Article 6th: Officers servants of the people

"That all power being originally inherent in and [n]sequently derived from the people, therefore, all officers of government, whether legislative or executive, are their trustees and servants; and at all times, in a legal way, accountable to them."

Please take notice that the Alger County Board of Commissioners and County Sheriff have collaborated to approve and contract with service provider(s) for installation of warrantless surveillance of public spaces in Alger County without the express consent of the free people of the eight constitutional townships therein.

Please take notice that the people's right of life, liberty and property are excepted from all powers granted to government, and cannot be deprived under any condition without 'due process of law' including trial by jury. Establishing surveillance over the people of the townships is a fundamental attack on the people's liberty right of independence beyond all governmental powers. (see evidence below):

Maxim of Law: "No freeman shall be deprived of life, liberty or property but by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land-that is by the common law." C.L.M.

Texas Constitution Bill of Rights, Section 29: Provisions of Bill of Rights Excepted from Powers of Government; to Forever Remain Inviolate [excerpt]

"To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein delegated, we declare that everything in this "Bill of Rights" is excepted out of the general powers of government, and shall forever remain inviolate"

Maxim of Law: "Natural liberty is the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, unless by the law of nature." 1 BI. Comm. 125.

Question #1:

Where in any constitution did the people grant you (trustee) the power to intervene in the people's inviolate right of liberty?

Please take notice that you are bound by sworn oath to the terms of the Michigan Constitution, your contract and trust indenture to the people. Just as the state legislature can make no laws impairing the obligation of contract, your exercise of contracts with service suppliers for a surveillance program is equally in violation; as it impairs your preexisting contract to protect the people's inviolate right of liberty. The net effect of such action(s) is that you have turned the trust against the Beneficiary (the people), which is a highest-level abdication of duty. (see evidence below):

Michigan Declaration of Rights, Section 10: Attainder; Ex Post Facto Laws; Impairment of Contracts

"No bill of attainder, ex post facto law or law impairing the obligation of contract shall be enacted."

Maxim of Law: "Agreements give the law to the contract." Halk. Max. 118.

Question #2: Where in any constitution did the people grant you the power to contract with other agents against your preexisting obligation to protect the people's rights under the Michigan Constitutional Contract and Trust?

Please take notice that this remonstrance is evidence of your performance being contrary to your sworn duty of obeying the constitutions; subjecting a large number of the people of Alger County to continual deprivation of private liberties, and the perpetual threat of false prosecution. The violations of people's liberty listed above are serious in nature; by definition these are not 'official acts' by which the people have granted government officers immunity from liability for 'official acts'. Instead, contrary actions become 'unofficial acts' by which immunity is invalidated, and remedy to those people injured in the law is due. Any commissioner that has voted Nay for this surveillance program has committed an 'official act' and is guaranteed immunity from liability for said acts. (see evidence below)

Maxim of Law: Remedy signifies the judicial means for enforcing a right or redressing a wrong. Walters V. City of Ottawa, 88 N.E. 651, 654, 240 III. 259.

Trump V. United States :: 603 U.S. 593 (2024) "he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts."

Please take final notice that this notice is a remonstrance for exceeding your granted powers and attacking the people's private right of liberty; and secondly, the constitutional contract itself. Should you contract with attorneys, using the people's resources in an effort to find an alternate path to install warrantless surveillance systems, it will become a further betrayal of the people's Trust under Declaration of Rights Section 10 as seen above. It is my wish, order, and demand that you immediately cease and desist in any attempt to surveil the sovereign people of the townships. Furthermore you must enter into the public record that all such efforts are terminated and will not be readdressed in the future. If you believe any of the above claims are untrue or that you have the authority in any way, which would allow any Public Servant, Agent, or Corporate Entity to infringe on the People's Rights, please show where you were granted these Constitutional Authorities. Any disputes by any public officials or private actors who are bound by contract to the Michigan Constitution or the United States Constitution, agrees to have these matters heard before an arbitrator of my choice and to be bound thereby. All responses must be submitted by affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury, within five (5) days of receiving this Notice or you agree, by acquiescence, all statements in this Notice to be true and fact. Further, you agree that you are acting with full knowledge, intent, and malice by trespassing on the Private People and our rights, and that no court shall be able to rehear this matter, but it shall stand as evidence, truth and law in all courts of record. A response from an attorney on statutory matters will be considered a non-response and a direct interference with the people's fundamental right to instruct their representatives as seen in Michigan Constitution Artiicle 1 section 3.

Maxim of Law: "Whose right it is to institute, his right it is to abrogate." Broom, Max. 878, note.

This notice is sent to you in peace and with the love of Christ, so that you may provide due care to those who have all political power, the People.

Excerpts from County Commissioners meeting minutes, October 21, 2024

“It was moved by Commissioner Livermore and seconded by Commissioner Capogrossa to approve purchase of license plate scanner from Vigilant Solution in the amount of $16,850. Monies are to come from Stonegarden Grant (205-346-976.000). Motion carried by the following vote: Ayes – Commissioners Capogrossa, Livermore, Nettleton, and Seaberg. Nays – Commissioner Rondeau. Absent – None.”

https://fordschool.umich.edu/news/2023/automated-license-plate-readers-widely-used-subject-abuse

https://stpp.fordschool.umich.edu/research/policy-brief/automated-license-plate-readers-legal-and-policy-evaluation