Macha 2024 Electronic Payments Conference: Session Evaluation
Session Title
Please Select
1. Keynote: Cracking the Code: Understanding and Implementing Instant Payments Solutions
2. Payments Through Time: Reflecting on the Past and Charting the Future
3. The State of Check Fraud in 2024
4. ISO 20022 Readiness for the Fedwire Funds Service
5. Vendor Showcase-Bankers' Bank
6. Vendor Showcase-Identifee
7. Vendor Showcase-Nacha
8. Lunch Presentation: Identifee
9. State of Play in Payments
10. The Adventures of Being a Data Detective: Locating and Evaluating Data Sources to Ensure Effective Transaction Monitoring
11. Fraud and Dispute Claims: Intake, Investigation, and Resolution
12. Digital Assets: Beyond the Hype
13. Ripped from the Headlines
14. The New Regs and What to Do About Them
15. Demystifying the "Game" of Risk
16. Authority, Authentication and Account Validation: A Review of Legal Obligations, Liabilities and Risks
17. Why Instant? Why Now?
18. Is Checkless Lockbox the Future?
19. Payments Risk and Compliance: Current Ponderings on Common Audit Findings
20. Unlocking Efficiency in Banking: Leveraging AI for Streamlined Workflows
21. Vendor Showcase- Instant Payments Cookbook- Macha and OPN
22. Vendor Showcase- MagicWrighter
23. Vendor Showcase- Q2
24. Lunch Presentation: Bankers' Bank
25. Washington Insider: Payments Policy and Politics
26. Banking with a Heart-A Human Being Behind Every Transaction
Drop down to select the session title
The topics covered were relevant, interesting, and timely.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The session information will help me be more effective in my position.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The session was consistent with the description in the agenda.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall, the speaker(s) for this session were knowledgeable.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall, the speaker(s) for this session were engaging.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The technical level of the presentation was appropriate.
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Any comments on why you would or would not recommend this speaker(s) for next year's conference?
Any additional comments about this session?
Submit
Should be Empty: