2024 EMGS Annual Meeting Evaluation
Please take approximately five minutes to complete this survey. Your input matters!
Attendee Type
*
Please Select
Student Member
Early Career Member
Emeritus Member
Regular Member
Student Non-Member
Early Career Non-Member
Regular Non-Member
Your type of employment?
*
Academia
Government
Industry
Research Institute
Other
What days did you attend the meeting?
*
Saturday
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Number of EMGS Annual Meetings attended?
*
First Time Attendee
2-5 Meetings Attended
5 or More Meetings Attended
Do you prefer a meeting that overlaps with the weekend?
*
No, I prefer weekdays
Yes, I like weekend overlap
What is your ideal meeting length?
*
Three days
Four days
Five days
Six days
Which of the following months are most convenient for you to attend the EMGS Annual Meeting? (Select all that apply)
*
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Logistics and Organization
Please state your level of agreement with the following statements:
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The online registration process was easy to navigate.
The cost of registration was reasonable.
Communication leading up to the event was clear and timely.
The quality of audio/visual met my expectations.
My experience with the EMGS association management staff was positive.
The quality and quantity of food provided was satisfactory.
My experience with the Renaissance Palm Springs staff was positive.
It was convenient to find dining options outside of the conference hotel.
I would recommend the EMGS Annual Meeting to a colleague.
Are there any aspects of the meeting that you would like to see replicated in future meetings?
*
Additional Comments on Logistics and Organization
Did you stay at the Renaissance Palm Springs Hotel??
*
Yes
No
If no, why not?
Would you like to see another EMGS Annual Meeting in Palm Springs, CA?
*
Yes
No
Scientific Content
Please state your level of agreement with the following statements:
*
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
The scientific content was relevant to my current work or research.
The diversity of topics covered in the scientific sessions was satisfactory.
The meeting showcased new advancements and cutting-edge scientific research.
Please rate the following keynote and award lectures on content.
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Did Not Attend
Keynote Speaker 1: Phil Hanawalt
Keynote Speaker 2: Wei Yang
Keynote Speaker 3: Ting Wang
Keynote Speaker 4: Qi Chen
Hollaender Award Lecture: Bevin Engelward
EMGS Award Lecture: Andre Nussenzweig
Please rate the following symposia sessions on content.
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Did Not Attend
Symposium 1: Applying New Methods for Epigenetics Research to Environmental Health and Toxicology
Symposium 2: Towards the development of a global genotoxicity AOP network
Symposium 3: Application of -omics Approaches to Advance Genetic Toxicology and Understand Carcinogenesis
Symposium 4: Endogenous Defects and Exogenous Sources of Replication Stress Driving Genome Instability
Symposium 5: Cannabis and Cannabinoids: Perspectives on Gene-Environment Interaction
Symposium 6: Genetic and Protein Interaction Networks in Nucleic Acid Transactions
Symposium 7: At the Crossroads of DNA Repair and the Immune System
Symposium 8: Data-Driven, AI-Enabled Innovations: The Applications of AI in Genetic Toxicology
Symposium 9: Under the Spotlight; High-Profile Chemicals
Symposium 10: Risk Management of DNA-Reactive Contaminants Using the Relative Potency Concept
Symposium 11: Transcriptomic Points of Departure for Chemical Safety Evaluation
Symposium 12: Clearing the Air on Epigenetic Changes Following Exposure to Emerging Inhaled Toxicants
Please rate the following platform sessions on content.
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Did Not Attend
Platform 1: Advancements in Mutagenesis and DNA Repair Research
Platform 2: Epigenetic Responses to Environmental Exposures
Platform 3: Sequencing the Genome and Beyond
Platform 4: Mechanisms of Genotoxicity
Additional Comments on the Scientific Content
Networking and Social Activities
Was there sufficient time for interpersonal networking or other “non-meeting” interactions?
*
Yes
No
Additional Comments on Networking Opportunities
Rate the following Special Interest Group Meetings.
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Did Not Attend
Applied Genetic Toxicology
DNA Repair and Mutagenic Mechanisms
Epigenomics
Genomics and Data Sciences
Genotoxicity Risk Assessment and Public Health (GRAPH)
Germ Cell and Heritable Effects
In Vivo Mutagenesis
Additional Comments on Special Interest Group Meetings
Please indicate your preferred timing for the annual SIG meetings.
*
Before the lunch break
Prior to morning keynote session
No preference
Other
If you selected "Other," please specify your preferred timing or suggest an alternative schedule:
Rate the following EMGS Events.
*
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Did Not Attend
Workshop 1: Sequencing the Future: Understanding Error-Corrected Sequencing
Welcome Reception
Student and Early Career Investigator Luncheon
Poster Session 1 (Odd Poster Numbers)
Women in EMGS Luncheon
Poster Session 2 (Even Poster Numbers)
Sunset Heart of the City Walking Tour
EMGS Awards Ceremony and Banquet Dinner
Additional Comments on Annual Meeting Events
Future Meetings
Will you be attending the 2025 EMGS Annual Meeting in Rochester, NY?
*
Yes
No
I don't know at this time.
What topics would you like to see covered at future EMGS Annual Meetings?
*
I’m a member of EMGS, and I’d like to share these reasons for why I support EMGS and attend EMGS annual meetings:
I would like to share a few insights as to why I am not a member of EMGS:
Additional Comments
Submit
Should be Empty: