PEPTalk Post-Event Evaluation Form

PEPTalk Post-Event Evaluation Form

PEPTalk Post-Event Evaluation Form

03 September 2024 | Conrad Manila
Participant's Name*

First NameLast Name
Company Name*
Sex*

FemaleMale
Dear Participant,

The Tourism Promotions Board (TPB) desires to continuously improve the effectiveness of its programs. We, therefore, request you to evaluate the PHITEX Educational Program you attended. Your inputs will be collated and summarized as a reference for future activities.

It is understood that the information obtained here will be used solely for improving the programs of the TPB and will be in accordance with the provisions of the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

Please check (√) the column that best corresponds to your rating and feel free to add comments and suggestions.
A. Job Relevance

Job Relevance*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree (4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The seminar helped me develop my skills and enhanced my knowledge in my current job.
2. The skills I have gained could be immediately practiced in the workplace.
3. The seminar met my expectations.

SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME)

MR. JOHANNES MABULAY

MR. JOHANNES MABULAY (Topic: All Together Now: Innovative Collaboration in the Tourism Industry)*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The SME shows knowledge and expertise in the subject matter.
2. The SME provides examples and is able to make the topics to my learning needs.
3. The SME's ideas were presented convincingly and logically sequenced.
4. The SME took time to entertain questions and ensure understanding of the attendees.
5. The SME interacts well with the participants and engages them effectively to inspire interest and enthusiasm.
6. The SME conducts himself/herself with demeanor.

B. Trainer / Facilitator
SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME)

MS. EYLLA LAIRE M. GUTIERREZ

MS. EYLLA LAIRE M. GUTIERREZ (Topic: The Circular Economy: Engagement and Empowerment)*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The SME shows knowledge and expertise in the subject matter.
2. The SME provides examples and is able to make the topics to my learning needs.
3. The SME's ideas were presented convincingly and logically sequenced.
4. The SME took time to entertain questions and ensure understanding of the attendees.
5. The SME interacts well with the participants and engages them effectively to inspire interest and enthusiasm.
6. The SME conducts himself/herself with demeanor.

SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME)

MS. LIZ ORTIGUERA

Topic: Love Myself, Love the Philippines

MS. LIZ ORTIGUERA (Topic: Love Myself, Love the Philippines)*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The SME shows knowledge and expertise in the subject matter.
2. The SME provides examples and is able to make the topics to my learning needs.
3. The SME's ideas were presented convincingly and logically sequenced.
4. The SME took time to entertain questions and ensure understanding of the attendees.
5. The SME interacts well with the participants and engages them effectively to inspire interest and enthusiasm.
6. The SME conducts himself/herself with demeanor.

SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME)

COACH PHILIP NUCLEUS L. SIA

COACH PHILIP NUCLEUS L. SIA (Topic: Positioning the Philippines as one of Asia’s LGBTQIA+ friendly destinations)*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The SME shows knowledge and expertise in the subject matter.
2. The SME provides examples and is able to make the topics to my learning needs.
3. The SME's ideas were presented convincingly and logically sequenced.
4. The SME took time to entertain questions and ensure understanding of the attendees.
5. The SME interacts well with the participants and engages them effectively to inspire interest and enthusiasm.
6. The SME conducts himself/herself with demeanor.

SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT (SME)

DR. MARIA PAZ ALBERTO

DR. MARIA PAZ ALBERTO (Topic: Market Updates)*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The SME shows knowledge and expertise in the subject matter.
2. The SME provides examples and is able to make the topics to my learning needs.
3. The SME's ideas were presented convincingly and logically sequenced.
4. The SME took time to entertain questions and ensure understanding of the attendees.
5. The SME interacts well with the participants and engages them effectively to inspire interest and enthusiasm.
6. The SME conducts himself/herself with demeanor.

C. Seminar Design

Seminar Design*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The topics were clear and well presented.
2. The information is accurate, very interesting and new to most participants.
3. The program followed a logical build-up of learning. Transition from one topic to the next flows smoothly.

D. Facilities / PEPTalk Administration

Facilities / PEPTalk Administration*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The seminar area was conducive to training.
2. The breaks were announced and strictly followed.
3. The PEPTalk coordinator ensured the smooth flow of the training and was readily available for any assistance.

PHITEX Platform (for Online Participants only)

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. The software platform used in terms of End-User Capabilities is easy to navigate.

E. Overall Rating

Overall Rating*

Rows	Strongly Agree (5)	Agree(4)	Undecided (3)	Disagree (2)	Strongly Disagree (1)
1. I find the seminar worth taking.
2. I will recommend the course to others.

1. What did you learn in the program that you anticipate using in your workplace?*
2. How can the program be improved?*
3. Other comments / suggestions*
Should be Empty: