Notice to Arizona DCS (Child Protective Services) of Failure to Acknowledge Due Process as a Practice and Duty to Return Unlawfully Taken Children by Right
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, one of the People (as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), Sui Juris, do send you this notice that you may be informed on the fundamental principles of law that apply to actions that your entity has been taking for approximately a decade, that fail to follow constitutionally guaranteed due process of law as defined in Black’s Law 5th edition (as shown below), that you and your agent’s may be made aware that the Federal Supreme Court Justices have shown the actions taken were not according to historical law in America and attorneys have failed to give full disclosure:
Due Process of Law excerpt [Please notice the necessity of using the settled maxims] (Blacks Law 5th Edition):
Due process of law. Law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice. Due process of law in each particular case means such an exercise of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under such safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribe for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. A course of legal proceedings according to those rules and principles which have been established in our systems of jurisprudence for the enforcement and protection of private rights. To give such proceedings any validity, there must be a tribunal competent by its constitution-that is, by the law of its creation-to pass upon the subject-matter of the suit; and, if that involves merely a determination of the personal liability of the defendant, he must be brought within its jurisdiction by service of process within the state, or his voluntary appearance. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 733, 24 L.Ed. 565. Due process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgment upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him, this is not due process of law.
Please take notice that the People have assembled and requested that Supreme Court Justice Gorsuch address and give full disclosure of the failure of government actors to give the very same due process of law based on already settled maxims of law as stated earlier; And
Evidence Link 1:
https://youtu.be/sHdSXNkqcf0?si=cK0f1A2ZYdgE2hH_ (from 48:17 to 51 minutes)
Please take notice that the recent letter sent out by Arizona DCS instructing people to consult with their attorneys to assess whether or not things were done correctly based upon some procedure is minimal compared to the fact that the whole process of taking children in the first place was executed without actual JUDICIAL warrants, without impartial entities, no trial by juries, all of which are a necessity to interfere with life, liberty and property (see evidence below):
2. Link to Gorsuch explaining no juries:
'I Think We All See The Problem Around Us': Justice Gorsuch Discusses Book Decrying 'Too Much Law' (From 48:17 to 51 minutes mark)
3. Evidence Link to Arizona Constitution Demanding that Courts be courts of record
https://ballotpedia.org/Article_6,_Arizona_Constitution
Arizona Constitution Article 6 Section 30
Text of Section 30:
Courts of Record
A. The supreme court, the court of appeals and the superior court shall be courts of record. Other courts of record may be established by law, but justice courts shall not be courts of record.
B. All justices and judges of courts of record, except for judges of the superior court and other courts of record inferior to the superior court in counties having a population of less than two hundred fifty thousand persons according to the most recent United States census, shall be appointed in the manner provided in section 37 of this article.
4. Evidence Link to Gorsuch showing that there are bad processes of evidence in tribunals;
https://youtu.be/sHdSXNkqcf0?si=cK0f1A2ZYdgE2hH_ (from 48:17 to 51 minutes)
5. Evidence Link to Gorsuch explaining that the judges are wearing robes but not acting as judicial and not really judges
https://youtu.be/sHdSXNkqcf0?si=cK0f1A2ZYdgE2hH_ (from 48:17 to 51 minutes)
6. Evidence Link to Gorsuch talking about attorneys
'I Think We All See The Problem Around Us': Justice Gorsuch Discusses Book Decrying 'Too Much Law'
📌#4 video for Gorsuch talking about too many lawyers At minute mark 12:04-13:37.
7. Evidence Link to Bruen case explaining that the multi step method and failing to use the constitutional and historical analysis is wrong (please take notice that in this case, government attempts to use rules or statutes to block a person's fundamental rights and felt it would be justified. However, the Supreme Court has shown that this policy is in error. Please equate this to making statutes saying that you can take children without proper judicial warrants, no trials by jury, no courts of record, and adopt them out. This is not in line with the state constitution)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843
Held: New York’s proper-cause requirement violates the Fourteenth Amendment by preventing law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms in public for self-defense. Pp. 8–63.
8. Evidence Link to Gupta showing that 100s of thousands of cases were done without due process of law:
https://cpilj.law.uconn.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2515/2018/10/10.1-Filling-the-Due-Process-Donut-Hole-Abuse-and-Neglect-Cases-between-Disposition-and-Permanency-by-Josh-Gupta-Kagan.pdf
Please take notice that the issues addressing the removal of children from their parents without due process of law has already been addressed and should serve as notice to all agents participating in this unlawful and unconstitutional practice as evidenced in the two cases below:
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxHDvi2ixG89C3G3xAF8EuuUAARPfVBRHN?si=31QN4Ev3ZRWfBah7
https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxtn3hrXbu3KNtk7f-4_KGV2x5K3_EWJ1t?si=US8a_Zkf4ZPohZBn
Please take notice that justice be served not just by directing parents to reach out to an attorney who took part in watching past wrongs in order to see if one has a case against said wrongs, but instead by the officers of the agency correcting the wrongs by returning children who were unlawfully taken as time doesn’t cure wrong process and agency and court/legislative tribunal actions that did not follow the highest law of the state and federal constitutions; And
It is therefore, my wish and demand that you look into the actions of the agency that did not follow the fundamental due process of law (as written in above excerpt) and return the unlawfully taken children to their original jurisdiction, under the care, custody and control of their parents immediately. This notice is sent in the peace and love of Christ with the intention that your employees, past and present, will come together and do that which is right and equitable, that there may be forgiveness and an opportunity for healing and restoration between children and parents. However, failure to delve deeper into this issue and take all necessary measures to correct these constitutional violations, shall be considered evidence against you and all of your agents, that you are and have willfully participated in the unlawful atrocities that have plagued families but have brought financial gain to your entity and partners. Remedy shall be had in returning children.