To: The Supreme Court Justices
Notice and Constitutional Demand for Judges to Notice the Constitution
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, ______________, one of the people (as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), republican in form, Sui Juris, do serve you this notice as a constitutional necessity, so that you do provide due care;
Please take Notice that the People have assembled and are grateful for the Supreme Court’s return to fundamental principles and the simplicity of written constitutions to guard constitutional rights and preserve this great nation, and that the people observe a pattern of practice wherein judges do not take judicial notice of the Constitution.
Please take Further Notice that America’s founders understood the many threats to God-given rights, so they made the judiciary independent from other branches of government and gave judges the duty to guard constitutional rights with impunity. As seen below, Justice James Kent, a settled authority in law, wrote about how judges were made independent to defend constitutional rights:
“Bills of rights are part of the muniments of freeman, showing their title to protection, and they become of increased value when placed under the protection of an independent judiciary, instituted as the appropriate guardian of private right.” (Kent, Commentaries, Lec XXIV)
Please take Additional Notice that the duty of judges is to seek, find, and declare the law. The search for the law begins with the law. The Constitution's text is the law. Constitutions reserve rights outside of government. And so when a judge notices the Constitution, he finds peoples’ rights. However, judges today demonstrate a pattern of practice wherein they skip the Constitution in their search of the law. Money-making attorneys, predatory government officials, and other bad actors use the confusion and complexity of modern statutory procedures or case law to distract judges from the Constitution's text. Judges are bombarded with bad excuses to not do their jobs. But that is not an excuse. An elementary student knows the right to property is in the Bill of Rights, but a judge not noticing the Constitution nullifies that right when it matters most. (see authority below):
Maxim of Law: “To investigate [inquire into] is the way to know what things are truly lawful.” Litt. s. 443; Bouv. 150.
Please take Final Notice that it is my wish and demand that you do immediately and openly declare that judicial inquiry begins with the text of constitutions, so that judges guard people’s constitutional rights in simplicity and with power.
Please take Notice that this is sent to you in the peace and love of Jesus Christ.