engaging narrative; compelling structure that draws in the audience. Well-researcGood Research & hed with Credibility credible
with some minor areasmay lack that could bedepth or cohesion. engaging.
present butstory; lacks adifficult to coherentfollow. beginning, middle, and end.
Some research but research is evident but lacks some
expert interviews, and strong historical or factual background. Excellent cinematogra phy with minor flaws striking within stability, stronglighting, or framing, composition,
supporting may rely onevidence; lacks speculation or lackcredibility. verification.
AdequatePoorly shotNo visual visuals but footage; lacks shaky, dark,extremely creativity ororlow-quality consistencyimproperlyfootage. framed in shot shots.
and creative use of lighting. Crystal-clear audio, backgroundbut may appropriate sound levels,noise orhave occasional effective uselevel of ambient inconsistencissues (e.g., sound and ies.
mostly cleardistracting, with significant noise, distortion, muffled dialogue, overpowerin g background noise
Paranormal ThoughtfulGood and evidence Evidence & with some Interpretatiowell-present critical ed evidence, including a balanced may lean approach toheavily skepticismtoward and belief. assumption.
Basic presentation of evidence but lacks
Weak evidence with little effort to
analysis butinterpretatio analyze or n or depth.contextualiz