In this section, you must clearly state the grounds for your review request and provide supporting evidence. Your application will only be considered if it meets the valid grounds outlined in the Assessment Policy.
Valid Grounds for Review:
- The assessment was not marked in accordance with the published criteria.
- A technical error occurred in marking or mark collation.
- There was bias on the part of the marker.
Important:
- Applications based on workload, financial hardship, or comparison with other students will not be considered.
- Clearly describe the specific issues and link them to the assessment criteria or rubric.
- Attach supporting evidence such as:
- Annotated rubric or marking guide
- Screenshots of marked work highlighting discrepancies
- Email correspondence with your lecturer
Preferred Outcome:
Indicate what resolution you are seeking (e.g., re-marking, correction of error). Please note that a review may result in your grade being increased, decreased, or remain the same.