At the moment, Canada uses a private sponsorship model for many of its labour migration programs. This means Canada has delegated to private employers (and for-profit agents operating on their behalf) the privilege of selecting, sponsoring and influencing the initial integration of individuals migrating through these programs. It also means that workers are systematically required to secure an employer-sponsor, to access initial work permits or renewals.
With this approach, employers are often responsible for arranging and financing the administrative costs associated with recruitment, job placement and immigration services, covering workers’ transportation to and from Canada, and providing housing once they arrive. Countless private third parties have emerged to assist employers with these “responsibilities’’—recruitment agents, immigration consultants, job placement agencies, pre-departure advisors, travel agents, integration agents, and others.
In many cases, either formally or informally, due to the unavailability of publicly funded services, workers depend on employers and their agents for their social integration in the country and to navigate Canada’s very complex immigration procedures. Workers may also be forced to rely on employers and recruiters to access the money needed to finance their migration. This approach creates a system of deep dependency and control, where employers and their agents control nearly every aspect of a worker’s migration trajectory and integration.
In contrast, while very little state-funded support or assistance is offered to im·migrant workers, whether abroad or in Canada, the Government of Canada provides daily, state-funded services and support to Canadian employer-sponsors and their agents.
Giving employers and their agents control over access to work permits and nearly every aspect of the migration process enables systemic violations of im·migrant workers’ human and labour rights.
- Employers and agents' control over initial work permits and renewals allows them to extract, legally and/or illegally, exorbitant fees, sometimes upfront, before departure, and other times through payment plans after arrival. This allows both formal and informal debt bondage to develop between im·migrant workers and employers and their agents.
- Employer control over work permits and renewals restricts workers’ ability to exercise their rights. In the SAWP, this dynamic has been institutionalized through the annual “naming” process, which gives employers full discretion over who is invited back each year and allows them to blacklist workers.
- Private third-party actors—such as recruiters, immigration consultants, and job placement agencies—prioritize employers’ interests over workers’ rights and well-being. These actors often facilitate the surveillance, blacklisting, or even the removal of workers from the country who try to assert their rights