Criteria |
Questions |
An award-worthy project . . . |
Project Originality, Introduction, Summary, and Justification |
Is the project an original idea or approach?
How well is the introduction and justification explained?
|
Presents a highly original idea or a unique approach to an existing problem.
Introduction is comprehensive and clearly justifies importance.
|
Technical Ability and Proficiency |
Is the project technically complex?
Does the team demonstrate technical proficiency?
|
Is highly complex and team demonstrates excellent technical proficiency. |
Methodology |
Are the steps clearly explained and logically structured? |
Steps are clearly defined, logical and demonstrate thorough understanding. |
Practical Aspect |
Can the project be built today with available materials and resources? |
Fully feasible today with readily available materials and reasonable costs. |
Creativity and Innovation |
Does the project provide a new and innovative solution to a current need? |
Project is highly innovative, addressing a significant need in a novel way. |
Results and Conclusion |
Are results clearly presented?
Does the project provide meaningful conclusions and next steps?
|
Results are clear, well-documented and lead to a strong conclusion with next steps. |
Community Leadership and Importance to Society |
Does the project address a community issue and improve public well-being? |
Strong leadership shown in solving a major community problem with clear societal benefits. |
Importance to Peer Group |
Has the project been reviewed by peers or professionals?
Is it representative of ASET’s values?
|
Strong peer and/or professional validation.
Project aligns well with ASET’s mission and values.
|