To: Michigan Sheriffs

Notice to Instruct Michigan Sheriffs: Restore the People’s Grand Jury
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent 

I, __________________________ one of the People as seen in the Michigan Constitution Declaration of Rights, Section 1 and 3, Sui Juris, do serve this notice that you and your agents provide immediate due care, by necessity;

Please take notice that President Trump, AG Pam Bondi, and contract Agent Elon Musk have been served notice to declare if the grand jury is owned by the sovereign People or bureaucrats, Bar associations, and administrative agents. For generations the original intent of the grand jury has been blocked and hidden from the People with no corresponding grant of constitutional authority. Abuse of constitutional authority is an encroachment on the People’s rights. (See attached evidence) (See evidence below)

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) The American People are sovereign over government. And;

Please take notice the restoration of the People’s grand jury must be established at the county level in the fifty states. This notice distribution to all Michigan sheriffs serves as a broad diffusion of knowledge that the grand jury is a Constitutional body not belonging to the three branches of government; and is the sovereign People’s bulwark against any government overreach. The grand jury supports ‘trial by jury’ which is reserved for the People to receive justice in all matters of their life, liberty, or property. Constitutional ‘due process of law’ refers to a trial by jury in a court of record, following the course of the common law (Maxims). (See evidence below)

United States v. Williams, 504 U.S___ (1992). The Grand jury is mentioned in the Bills of Rights, but is not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textual assigned therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It is a Constitutional fixture in its own right... Thus, the citizens have the unbridled right to empanel their Grand juries and present "True Bills" of indictment to a Court...(Excerpt) (See encloser below)

SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) Non-judicial tribunals do not provide constitutional due process by the common law. (Excerpt)

Please take notice the State Constitution is your expressly written Trust Indenture and Contract to the People of Michigan. The Constitution prevails and any encroachment of the Sheriff’s status must be restored; The Sheriff is the chief protector of the people’s rights against any government encroachment and is the County’s Chief Executive and Administrative Officer. (See evidence below)

Express trust. A trust created or declared in express terms, and usually in writing, as distinguished from one inferred by the law from the conduct or dealings of the parties. Black’s Law 4th Edition

Maxim of Law: The contract makes the law.

Michigan Constitution Article III, Section 7: Common Law and Statutes, Continuance The common law and the statute laws now in force, not repugnant to this constitution, shall remain in force until they expire by their own limitations, or are changed, amended or repealed.

 Sheriff. The chief executive and administrative officer of a county, being chosen by popular election. His principal duties are in aid of the criminal courts and civil courts of record; such as serving process, summoning juries, executing judgments, holding judicial sales and the like. He is also the chief conservator of the peace within his territorial jurisdiction. American Law, Black’s Law Dictionary Fourth Edition (Excerpt) (Emphasis added) And;

Please take notice the People have assembled realizing they control the grand juries, and while sheriffs today have a role in summoning a grand jury, the People have been sending instructional notices and Affidavits of harm sworn under penalty of perjury; it is the Constitutional duty of the Sheriff to ensure the information is given to the County Clerk to be entered into the Court of Record and the information given to a Constitutionally impaneled grand jury. Restoring the Sheriff’s principal duties will be considered an official act with immunity as provided by law, returning to our Constitutional form of Republic. (See evidence below)

Trump v. United States : 603 U.S. 593 (2024) He must be given at least the presumption of immunity for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. (Excerpt)

Maxim of Law: An unconstitutional Act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.

 Please take final notice it is my wish, order, and demand that our servants and trustees publicly recognize the People’s inherent right to Grand Jury and that the People’s rights are self-executing prohibitions on governmental actions. Also, please know that the People need not engage in empty formalities before their rights can be invoked without governmental interference, except through Constitutional ‘due process of law’. This shall be accomplished by giving this notice to the county clerk for publication as county-wide public notice and by reading this notice aloud at the next public meeting. Failure to fulfill these requirements will show your actions are with full knowledge, intent, and malice. Furthermore, no court shall rehear this matter, but it shall stand as evidence, truth and law, in this court of record. If you believe any of these statements to be false, rebut by Affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury, point by point, within five (5) days of receiving this notice, showing your Constitutional grant of authority to deprive the People of their inherent right to redress of grievances and to instruct their servants and trustees, or you agree, by tacit acquiescence, that all statements are true and fact.

This notice is sent in the peace and love of Jesus Christ that you provide immediate due care, by necessity, and that justice may be had, and past transgressions may become restoration for those with all political power, the People.

Psalm 19:11 Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward.

 

ENCLOSURE

DEFINITIONS FROM BLACK’S LAW 4th DICTIONARY:

Trial by Jury. Black’s Law Dictionary Fourth Edition “A jury for the trial of a cause was a body of twelve men, described as upright, well qualified, and lawful men, disinterested and impartial, not of kin nor personal dependents of either of the parties, having their homes within the jurisdictional limits of the court, drawn and selected by officers free from all bias in favor of or against either party, duly impaneled under the direction of a competent court, sworn to render a true verdict according to the law and the evidence given them, who, after hearing the parties and their evidence, and receiving the instructions of the court relative to the law involved in the trial, and deliberating, when necessary, apart from all extraneous influences, must return their unanimous verdict upon the issue submitted to them.”

Court of Record. “Courts of record” “being those whose acts and judicial proceedings are enrolled, or recorded, for a perpetual memory and testimony, and which have power to fine or imprison for contempt. Error lies to their judgments, and they generally possess a seal.” “A "court of record" is a judicial tribunal having attributes and exercising functions independently of the person of the magistrate designated generally to hold it, and proceeding according to the course of common law, its acts and proceedings being enrolled for a perpetual memorial. “

Common Law. “As distinguished from law created by the enactment of legislatures, the common law comprises the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity, or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs;” “As distinguished from equity law, it is a body of rules and principles, written or unwritten, which are of fixed and immutable authority, and which must be applied to controversies rigorously and in their entirety, and cannot be modified to suit the peculiarities of a specific case, or colored by any judicial discretion”

Maxim. “An established principle or proposition. A principle of law universally admitted, as being a correct statement of the law, or as agreeable to reason. Coke defines a maxim to be "conclusion of reason," and says that it is so called "quia maxima ejus dignitas et certissima auctoritas, et quod maxime omnibus probetur." Co.Litt. 11a. He says in another place: "A maxime is a proposition to be of all men confessed and granted with out proofe, argument, or discourse." Id. 67a.”

Due Process of Law Black’s Law Fifth Edition [excerpt]: “Law in its regular course of administration through courts of justice. Due process of law in each particular case means such an exercise of the powers of the government as the settled maxims of law permit and sanction, and under the safeguards for the protection of individual rights as those maxims prescribe for the class of cases to which the one in question belongs. A course of legal proceedings according to those rules and principles which have been established in our systems of jurisprudence for the enforcement and protection of private rights. To give such proceedings any validity, there must be a tribunal competent by its constitution that is, by the law of its creation-to pass upon the subject-matter of the suit; and, if that involves merely a determination of the personal liability of the defendant, he must be brought within its jurisdiction by service of process within the state, or his voluntary appearance. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 733, 24 I., Ed. 565. Due process of law implies the right of the person affected thereby to be present before the tribunal which pronounces judgement upon the question of life, liberty, or property, in its most comprehensive sense; to be heard, by testimony or otherwise, and to have the right of controverting, by proof, every material fact which bears on the question of right in the matter involved. If any question of fact or liability be conclusively presumed against him this is not due process of law.