Data collection for Fuzzy AHP analysis to select Blockchain platform for Product Lifecycle Management Logo
  • Data collection for Fuzzy AHP analysis to select Blockchain platform for Product Lifecycle Management

  • Dear Participant

    Thank you for taking the time to support my research.

    I am currently conducting a thesis on "Selection of Blockchain Platform for Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP)". The purpose of this study is to evaluate and prioritize key criteria for selecting a blockchain platform suitable for Product Lifecycle Management and to assess potential blockchain platforms based on these criteria.

    This survey is divided into two sections:

    Section 1: Requires a pairwise comparison of selection criteria to understand their relative importance.

    Section 2: A direct rating of five blockchain platforms against each criterion.

    Your expert judgment and experience are invaluable for ensuring the robustness and relevance of this study. The data collected will be used solely for academic purposes and will be treated with strict confidentiality.

    All responses provided in this survey will remain strictly confidential and will be anonymized for analysis. The information collected will be used solely for academic research purposes related to the Thesis.

    If you have any questions or concerns regarding this study, please feel free to contact: delluksan.navaratnam@b-tu.de

    Completing the survey should take approximately 5-7 minutes.

    PS: Users of SurveyCircle.com receive points for their participation, which they can use to recruit study participants free of charge.

  • Background Information

  • Section 1: Pairwise Comparison of Criteria

  • Instruction:

    Compare each pair of criteria based on their relative importance in the context of selecting a suitable blockchain platform for Product Lifecycle Management (PLM). 

    Use the linguistic scale below to indicate how much more /less / equal important the first criterion is compared to the second criterion. 

    • Extremely less important
    • Very strongly less important
    • Significantly less important
    • Slightly less important
    • Equally Important
    • Slightly more Important
    • Significantly more Important
    • Very Strong Importance
    • Extreme Importance
  • Section 2: Direct Rating of Blockchain Platforms

  • Instruction:

    Please evaluate each blockchain platform based on how well it performs under the given criteria.

    • Very Poor
    • Poor
    • Average
    • Good
    • Better




     
  •  
  • Redeem the following survey code under https://www.surveycircle.com and get participants for your study free of charge through SurveyCircle: MRP5-VQLY-KC11-PRQR

  • Should be Empty: