Supreme Court Notice of Remonstrance and Rebuke as Trustees and Servants
Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent and Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal
[Please provide additional notice to all agents and trustees serving the People by and through the Supreme Court]
I, one of the People,(as seen in the 50 State Constitutions), Sui Juris, do provide you as Trustees of the People, who work in the People’s established court, with this notice of grievance, strong rebuke and remonstrance, and not as a submission of a case. I am exercising the People's guaranteed right of giving notice of wrongdoings so that you may openly show constitutional authority whereby you were granted the power to return, without proper redress, the People’s grievances, instruction, remonstrance or cases that are owed to the People as remedy by right, And
Please take notice that there are guaranteed rights in the Constitutions and that the People wish for you to show in the same Constitutions where Clerks are allowed to interfere with these rights by blocking actions for redress of wrongs done, and where they are allowed to send back notice from the PEOPLE who are the Creators of,and Beneficiaries of Constitutional Trusts?, And
Please take notice that the First Amendment directly negates your Clerks claim that you, as Trustees and Supreme Court Justices are only allowed to take cases presented before you which are properly pled (per your rules and constraints) based on the Constitution. As government servants, you are bound to the People and must be allowed to be apprised of our protests and issues with your failure to act in a manner that is just. (Please see evidence below:)
”Congress Shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievance.” (Emphasis by underline added)
Please take notice that the People, as the beneficiaries of the Trust (the United States Constitution) and as those who are Trust Protectors (holding full power to reform, alter, and abolish government seats and the Constitution, as seen in evidence below) wish for you to show where you were expressly excluded from the right and authority of the People to give you notices, petitions, remonstrance for wrongdoings and breaches of trust against the People.
John Locke Two Treatises of Gov Section 239 excerpt
“And these two cases that the instances differ little from the above mentioned to be destructive to governments, only that he has omitted the principle from which his doctrine flows, and that is the breach of trust in not persevering the form of government agreed on, and in not intending the end of government itself, which is the public good and preservation of property. When a king has dethroned himself, and put himself in a state of war with the people, what shall hinder them from prosecuting him who is no king, as they would other man, who has put himself in a state of war with them…” ( Emphasis by bold added)
Please take notice that the People are not amused by the attempts of Clerks to obstruct the People's access to public servants. Therefore, we wish and demand for the following questions to be answered since Clerks have claimed limits as to what the court can receive per their wrongful interpretation of the Constitution:
-
Where in the Constitution does it grant Clerks or Supreme Court Justices the power to refuse Notice, Grievances, Remonstrances of the People, which are rendered by the People by right?
-
Where in the Constitution did we grant power for actors in the Supreme Court Clerks Office to charge fees for filing a writ of Habeas Corpus, which is a guaranteed right? (If one wishes to argue any act of Legislature, Please see the following definition of Constitutional Right from Blacks law 4th Edition):
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. A right guaranteed to the citizens by the Constitution and so guaranteed as to prevent legislative interference therewith. Delaney v. Plunkett, 146 Ga. 547, 91 S.E.561, 567, L.R.A.1917D, 926, Ann.Cas.1917E, 685.
-
If the People are guaranteed the right to redress trespass and harms committed against them, as Trustee’s where are you granted power to deny these rights which are repeatedly declared in State Constitutions? (See evidence below):
Wisconsin Constitution Declaration of Rights:
Text of Section 9: Remedy for Wrongs
"Every person is entitled to a certain remedy in the laws for all injuries, or wrongs which he may receive in his person, property, or character; he ought to obtain justice freely, and without being obliged to purchase it, completely and without denial, promptly and without delay, conformably to the laws.”
Arizona Constitution Declaration of Rights: Article 2 Section Section 11: "Justice in all cases shall be administered openly, and without purchase, completely and without delay."
Colorado Constitution Article II Section 6: ”Courts of justice shall be open to every person, and a speedy remedy afforded for every injury to person, property or character; and right and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay.”
Maxim of Law: Justice ought to be free, because nothing is more iniquitous than venal justice; full, because justice out not to be halt; and speedy, because delay is a kind of denial. 2 Inst. 56
Maxim of Law: Justice is neither to be denied nor delayed. Junk. Cent. 76, 93.
Please take notice that as the People, we created the Supreme Court as a court and as a part of justice to correct violations against People that have been harmed. The People have attempted to notify the Supreme Court of such violations committed by lower tribunals that aggrieve the beneficiaries of the Trust called the United States Constitution, only for the clerks to return said grievances without remedy. This power isn’t granted or found in any Constitution, state or federal. Therefore, the People wish to know where the Clerks believe they were granted this authority. Furthermore, the People wish to notify the Supreme Court Judges and Clerks that We, as the People, do recognize this act as a "Breach of Trust.”
Please take notice that administrative actors, not using fundamental law, have attacked us in these States, and as shown with the Bruen case, have been using legislative fiat that is foreign to the law of the Constitutions of the People. When the People submit writs of Mandamus or Habeas Corpus to correct the harms inflicted upon them (uncontroverted by our Affidavits), actors in the Supreme Court Clerks Office wish to demand fees, despite the fact that as the People we are already guaranteed access to the courts by the Constitutions sworn by Supreme Court Justices to uphold and honor. If you believe that this is incorrect, please show where in the Constitution does seeking justice by means of writ of Habeas Corpus or by any other lawful manner, come with a fee or a permission slip for access, allowing the Clerks Office to ignore, delay, deny the People's right to lawful remedy. If one cannot show Constitutional authority for these actions, please let it be known publicly, candidly and clearly, as this shall be understood as a Breach of Trust and just cause for the People to take back their power, as no acts may be committed against the Constitution without the parties committing such acts putting themselves at war with the Constitution that they swore to protect. Please take this notice as being sent in the peace and love of Christ, that you may do those acts which are just, pure and in faith to the Oath you swore to uphold.