Score Interpretation & Thresholds
The following thresholds are based on the original RCADS guidelines (Chorpita et al., 2000) and adapted for school-age populations. They indicate potential concern and should be used alongside professional judgment and contextual understanding.
Major Depression (10 items)
0–10 = Low
11–20 = Moderate
21–30 = High
Generalised Anxiety (8 items)
0–8 = Low
9–16 = Moderate
17–24 = High
Separation Anxiety (6 items)
0–6 = Low
7–12 = Moderate
13–18 = High
Social Phobia (7 items)
0–7 = Low
8–14 = Moderate
15–21 = High
Panic Disorder (10 items)
0–10 = Low
11–20 = Moderate
21–30 = High
Obsessive-Compulsive (7 items)
0–7 = Low
8–14 = Moderate
15–21 = High
A score in the 'High' range may indicate significant difficulties consistent with the diagnostic criteria for depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, separation anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or OCD. However, this tool is not a diagnostic assessment. High scores should be used to guide further clinical inquiry, support planning, referrals, or statutory assessments (e.g., EHCP evidence, CAMHS referrals).
Key References
Chorpita, B. F., Yim, L., Moffitt, C., Umemoto, L. A., & Francis, S. E. (2000). Assessment of symptoms of DSM-IV anxiety and depression in children: A revised child anxiety and depression scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(8), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00130-8
Chorpita, B. F., Moffitt, C. E., & Gray, J. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale in a clinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2004.02.004
Ebesutani, C., Bernstein, A., Nakamura, B. J., Chorpita, B. F., & Weisz, J. R. (2010). A psychometric analysis of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale—Parent Version in a clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9363-8
Weisz, J. R., Chorpita, B. F., Frye, A., Ng, M. Y., Lau, N., Bearman, S. K., ... & Hoagwood, K. E. (2011). Youth top problems: Using idiographic, consumer-guided assessment to identify treatment needs and to track change during psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023307
NICE. (2019). Social, emotional and mental wellbeing in primary and secondary education (NICE guideline [NG223]). National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.ukeview, 17(1), 67–84.
Additional Neurodivergent Domains (SRSSP™)
The following domains are included to capture needs often under-represented in traditional SEMH/RCADS tools. These sections are not diagnostic but provide a structured profile of strengths and challenges to guide support planning. Thresholds reflect relative levels of need and should be interpreted with professional judgment.
Executive Functioning
0–5 = Low difficulty
6–10 = Moderate difficulty
11–15 = High difficulty
Sensory Processing
0–5 = Low need
6–10 = Moderate need
11–15 = High need
Masking & Camouflaging
0–5 = Low impact
6–10 = Moderate impact
11–15 = High impact
Autistic Burnout / Emotional Exhaustion
0–5 = Low risk
6–10 = Moderate risk
11–15 = High risk