Notice and Demand to Cease and Desist Using Public Money for Non-Public Purposes Such as Economic Development
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
To: Blackford County Council (All Members); Blackford County Commissioners (All Members), Hartford City Mayor Dan Eckstein; Blackford County Sheriff Jim Heflin, Clinton County Council (All Members); Clinton County Commissioners (All Members), Frankfort City Council (All Members), Frankfort Mayor Judith Sheets, Benton County Council (All Members); Benton County Commissioners (All Members), Warren County Council (All Members); Warren County Commissioners (All Members), Huntington County Commissioners (All Members); Huntington County Council (All Members); Chief Judge Tanya Walton Pratt, United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana; Chief Judge Holly A. Brady, United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana; Chief Judge Diane S. Sykes, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Supreme Court of the United States;
Cc: Indiana Governor Mike Braun; Indiana Lieutenant Governor Micah Beckwith; Indiana House of Representatives (All Members); Indiana Senate (All Members); Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita; Indiana Supreme Court
I, _____________________________, one of the People as seen in the 50 State Constitutions, Republican in form, Sui Juris, do serve you, this Notice, by Necessity, that you do provide immediate due care:
Please take Notice that all power is inherent in the People (Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 1) and that the People have a right to lawfully instruct their government (Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 31) and that entities, including corporations and bodies politic, are created with the permission of the People and are obligated to act in good faith and with due regard solely for the People’s benefit. (See evidence below)
Maxim of Law: Good faith demands that what is agreed upon shall be done.
Maxim of Law: The welfare of the people is the supreme law; And
Please take further Notice that all government servants have an unavoidable obligation to use public money for public purposes and that the use of public money for a purpose without constitutional authority is an unofficial act for which there is no immunity. (Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024)). In Black’s Law Dictionary 1st edition, taxes are defined as “burdens or charges imposed by the legislature upon persons or property to raise money for public purposes” and in Black’s Law Dictionary 2nd edition, public purpose is defined as “in the law of taxation…this is a term…to distinguish the objects for which, according to settled usage, the government is to provide, from those which…are left to private interest.” Authority granted in the constitutions must be used exactly as specified without any departure. Furthermore, if the constitutions do not expressly grant such authority, it does not exist. (Excerpts) (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Maxim of Law: From the words of the law there must be no departure.
Maxim of Law: The expression of one thing is the exclusion of another; And
Please take further Notice that according to settled usage and the text, history, and tradition in constitutions, economic development, such as solar farms, wind farms, carbon sequestration, or data centers, are not a public purpose. (See evidence below)
North Dakota Constitution Article I Section 16: …a public use or a public purpose does not include public benefits of economic development, including an increase in tax base, tax revenues, employment, or general economic health. (Excerpt) (Bolded for emphasis) (See also Louisiana Constitution Article I Section 4)
Loan Association v. Topeka, 87 U.S. 655 (1874): We have established, we think, beyond cavil that there can be no lawful tax which is not laid for a public purpose. It may not be easy to draw the line in all cases so as to decide what is a public purpose…in the case before us…there is no difficulty in holding that this is not such a public purpose as we have been considering. If it be said that a benefit results to the local public of a town by establishing manufactures, the same may be said of any other business or pursuit which employs capital or labor…No line can be drawn in favor of the manufacturer which would not open the coffers of the public treasury to the importunities of two-thirds of the businessmen of the city or town. (Excerpt) (Bolded for emphasis) (See also Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U.S. 487 (1883) and Cole v. La Grange, 113 U.S. 1 (1885)); And
Please take further Notice that the fact that public money has already been used for non-public purposes creates no validity to continue to use public money for such purposes, and it remains an unofficial and voluntary act, for which there is no immunity. (See evidence below)
Maxim of Law: Things invalid from the beginning cannot be made valid by subsequent act.
Maxim of Law: Certain legal consequences are attached to the voluntary act of a person.
Loan Association v. Topeka, 87 U.S. 655 (1874): If the legislature was without power…and its statute…is void, payment of interest, which was equally unauthorized, cannot create…a power to levy taxes resting on…the fact that they have once been illegally levied for that purpose. (Excerpt)
Question: Where in the Indiana Constitution is there a grant of authority to use public money for non-public purposes? Failure to show this constitutional provision means you understand and agree that public money cannot be used for non-public purposes.
Please take Final Notice, that it is my wish, order, and demand that you provide remedy by immediately ceasing and desisting using public money for non-public purposes. If you believe that government has been granted power to use public money for non-public purposes, please respond with the constitutional grants of authority, or you agree that this practice is unlawful. Furthermore, please respond if you disagree with any of the claims within this notice. All responses shall be made within five (5) days receipt of this notice, by sworn affidavit, point by point, under penalty of perjury, or you agree by tacit acquiescence, to all claims herein, and this notice shall stand as evidence against you in all courts of record, that no court may rehear this matter, that this matter may be heard by an arbitrator of my choice, and that if remedy, as instructed, is not given, the people, to whom you sworn an oath, will recognize it as being done purposely, with full knowledge, malice, and intent. All responses not sworn under penalty of perjury are considered non-responses.
This notice is sent in the peace and love of Jesus Christ that you provide due care to those who hold all power, the People.
________________________________ _________________
Autograph Date
Maxim of Law: One lawfully commanding must be obeyed.
Maxim of Law: Judicial notice is a form of evidence.