CA 1: Notice and Demand for Constitutional Authority Regarding Redistricting in California
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, one of the People as seen in the 51 Constitutions, (Republican in Form) Sui Juris, do present this Notice that you provide immediate due care, by necessity, to those with all political power, the People.
Please take Notice the People have assembled and realize our right and duty to instruct government servants and trustees when they are in danger of or in Maladministration. The California Constitution has mandated strict criteria for redistricting that our trustees and servants are bound to. A redistricting map shall not be drawn for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent, political candidate, or political party. The stated purpose for AB604 and Proposition 50 is politically motivated, is unconstitutional, Maladministration and criminal; warring against the Constitution.. If passed, Proposition 50 will unlawfully allow the state to use a new, legislature-drawn congressional district map for 2026 through 2030 election cycles instead of the one drawn constitutionally by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission. Therefore passing legislation for redistricting, and placing Proposition 50 on the November 2025 ballot, are unofficial acts for which there is no immunity. (See evidence below) (Bolded for emphasis)
California Constitution Article I. Declaration of Rights, Section 3. (a) The people have the right to instruct their representatives, petition government for redress of grievances, and assemble freely to consult for the common good….(Excerpt)
MALADMINISTRATION. This term is used, in the law-books, interchangeably with misadministration, and both words mean "wrong administration." Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition.
California Constitution Article XXI. REDISTRICTING OF SENATE, ASSEMBLY, CONGRESSIONAL AND BOARD OF EQUALIZATION DISTRICTS. Section 1 & Section 2 & Section 3: (See evidence below)
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CONS&division=&title=&part=&chapter=&article=XXI
U.S. Supreme Court, Trump v. United States. No. 23-939: Decided July 1, 2024….There is no immunity for unofficial acts….(Excerpt) (Bolded for emphasis)
Maxim of Law: Punishment is due if the words of an oath be false.
Election Ad: Proposition 50; politicalized : https://stopelectionrigging.com/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22972371338
AB604: 2025 Redistricting Map: https://arcg.is/bi5qK
Proposition 50: A new, not bipartisan, district map and new constitutional amendment, not refereed by the bipartisan commission as required in the constitution is Maladministration; “Gavin Newsom, the Governor of California, first proposed that California could gerrymander its own congressional district maps to favor Democrats in an effort to offset potential gains from Texas's gerrymandering.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_California_Proposition_50
Map in Proposition 50 is politically motivated: Argument by Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-2): "This is about more than drawing lines on a map; it’s about drawing a line in the sand to stop Texas and Trump from rigging the election.” … (Excerpt) https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_50,_Use_of_Legislative_Congressional_Redistricting_Map_Amendment_(2025)
Proposition 50: proposed Constitutional Amendment: Politically Motivated/Arbitrary: Only Temporary until 2031: Adding Article XXI SEC. 4. https://elections.cdn.sos.ca.gov/statewide-elections/public-display/prop-50-text.pdf
Maxim of Law: An amendment [to the original instrument] is not a repeal. [Fundamental principles are not annulled by amendment.].
Please take Notice the current California Constitution Article XXI mandates a) the district map shall provide for geographical compactness of the Districts, b) a new district map shall occur at the beginning of each decade when a national census is taken, c) the Citizens Redistricting Commission shall adjust the boundary lines–not a legislative committee, and d) the Citizens Redistricting Commission shall refer the map to the Secretary of State. Additionally, the California Constitution Article XVIII. Section 1 mandates any amendment shall be voted on separately. However, the legislature is combining two separate issues into the one Proposition; issue 1: seeking voter approval of a constitutional amendment to add Section 4 to Article XXI and issue 2: seeking voter approval to adopt a new district map. This single proposition will not allow voters to split their vote on each issue thus violating the single subject constitutional provision. This is Unconstitutional and Maladministration. (See evidence below) (Bolded for emphasis)
California Constitution Article XVIII. Section 1. The Legislature… may propose an amendment or revision of the Constitution… Each amendment shall be so prepared and submitted that it can be voted on separately. (Excerpts) (Bolded for emphasis)
Maxim of Law: The law is not to be violated by those in government (Bolded for emphasis)
Maxim of Law: An unconstitutional Act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. (Bolded for emphasis) And;
Please take Final Notice; Where in the California Constitution did the People grant our servants and trustees the authority to redraw district maps prior to the completion of the decennial United States census or the authority to pass legislation for redistricting for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against an incumbent, political candidate, or political party? It is my wish, order, and demand SB 280, ACA8, AB 604 and Proposition 50 be withdrawn immediately, for the California legislature to announce publicly within 5 days of receiving this notice, all legislation passed which created the 2025 special election for redistricting unconstitutional, null and void. If you believe any of these statements to be false, rebut by Affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury, point by point, within five (5) days of receiving this Notice, showing your grant of authority to usurp the People’s Elections, or you agree by tacit acquiescence, that all statements herein are true and fact in the law and shall be heard by an arbitrator of my choice. Any further actions will show you are acting with full knowledge, intent, and malice trespassing on the People and their Constitutional Rights, and that no court shall rehear this matter, but it shall stand as evidence, truth, and law in all courts of record. Furthermore, you agree to be held individually liable to pay $1,000,000.00 (one million dollars) per infringement of the Peoples’ Rights. (Anyone suppressing this Notice agrees to pay $50,000) (A response from an attorney not directly addressed by this Notice will be considered a non-response)
This Notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Jesus Christ that you provide immediate due care to those with all political power, the People.
Maxim of Law. Judicial notice is a form of evidence.