Loudoun, Va Notice of Tortious Interference of the People's Constitutional Right to Due Process of Law, Recognition of Maladministration, and Demand for Remedy
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, _____________________, one of the People, as seen in the 50 State Constitutions, (Republican in Form), Sui Juris, do present this Notice that you provide immediate due care, by necessity, to those with all political power, the People.
Please take Notice; Where in the Constitutions did the People grant authority to our servants and trustees that allows them to abrogate and war against our Constitutional Right to Due Process of Law, under the Common Law? The People have assembled and realize that it is our duty and responsibility to instruct our government servants and trustees in all seats of government, when they are in danger of or in maladministration and tortiously interfering with Constitutional Due Process of Law. Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Pamela L. Brooks, Avelina S. Jacob, Jeanette A. Irby, Stephen E. Sincavage, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Rosemarie Annunziata, A. John Vollino, Lorrie Anne Sinclair Taylor, Maria Graff Decker, Don Scott, Winsome Earle-Sears, Michael L. Chapman, L. Louise Lucas, Glenn Youngkin, Mark Davis, Jessica D. Aber, Erik S. Siebert, Jason Miyares, Bob Anderson, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Vernida R. Chaney, Kimberely S. White, Steve Descano, Stanley Milan, Theresa Chafin, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Thomas P. Mann, Stephen R. McCullough, D. Arthur Kelsey, Cleo Powell, Mark Warner, Timothy Kaine, Suhas Subramanyam, Pam Bondi, Donald J. Trump, Alexander E. Morgan, Stephanie Sauer, Spencer Beckman, Elizabeth Vaughan, Christopher Dove, Charles F. Koehler, and Robert Vernail have tortiously interfered with the Peoples' Inherent Right to Constitutional Due Process of Law without Constitutional authority. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Miranda V. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) Chief Justice Warren delivered the opinion of the Court Pg. 491 Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them. (Bolded for emphasis) (Excerpt)
Maxim of Law: A court can only declare what the law is, and whether consistent with the law of God, and the fundamental or constitutional law of society.
ABROGATE. To annul, repeal, or destroy; to annul or repeal an order or rule issued by a subordinate authority; to repeal a former law by legislative act, or by usage. Black's Law 4th Edition
Maxim of Law: To derogate from a law is to take away part of it; to abrogate a law is to abolish it entirely. (Bolded for emphasis)
Cooper V. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1 (1958) Pg. 3... No state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it. (Bolded for emphasis) (Excerpt)
... when they who were set up for the protection and preservation of the People, their Liberties and Properties shall by force invade and indeavour to take them away; and so they putting themselves into a state of War with those who made them the Protectors and Guardians of their Peace, are properly, and with the greatest aggravation, Rebellantes Rebels... Two Treatises of Government, Essay by John Locke, Chapter XIX, Section 227 (Bolded for emphasis) (Excerpt)
Yick Wo V. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886) Pg. 370 Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law, for it is the author and source of law; ... But the fundamental rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, considered as individual possessions, are secured by those maxims of constitutional law which are the monuments showing the victorious progress of the race in securing to men the blessings of civilization under the reign of just and equal laws, ... (Bolded for emphasis) (Excerpts)
Maxim of Law: A good judge should do nothing of his own arbitrary will, nor on the dictate of his personal inclination, but should decide according to law and justice.
TORTIOUS. Injurious; done by wrong. 1. In law, implying tort, or injury for which the law gives damages. American Dictionary of the English Language, Noah Webster 1828. And;
Please take Notice on or about 8/12/24 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants unrebutted notices; The People's Notice of Recognition of Abused Power, Maladministration, and Nullified Actions; Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Pamela L. Brooks, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Wesley G. Russell, Jr., Thomas P. Mann, Stephen R. McCullough, D. Arthur Kelsey, Cleo Powell, Glenn Youngkin, Jason Miyares, Winsome Earle-Sears, Bob Anderson, Rosemarie Annunziata, Vernida R. Chaney, Kimberely S. White, Steve Descano, Stanley Milan, Theresa Chafin, Alexander E. Morgan, Spencer Beckman, Stephanie Sauer, Elizabeth Vaughan, and Christopher Dove. Then, on or about 9/12/24 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit of Violated Constitutional Rights by Unlawful Tribunal and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; Pamela Brooks and Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Neil Gorsuch, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Glenn Youngkin, Jason Miyares, Winsome Earle-Sears, Bob Anderson, Rosemarie Annunziata, Jessica Aber, Michael Chapman, Don Scott, Lorrie Anne Sinclair Taylor, L. Louise Lucas. In addition, on or about 10/23/24 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit of Violated Constitutional Rights by Unlawful Tribunal and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; Alexander E. Morgan, Spencer Beckman, Stephanie Sauer, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., Pamela L. Brooks, James P. Fisher, Neil Gorsuch, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Glenn Youngkin, Jason Miyares, Winsome Earle-Sears, Bob Anderson, Rosemarie Annunziata, Jessica Aber, Michael Chapman, Don Scott, Lorrie Anne Sinclair Taylor, L. Louise Lucas, Elizabeth Vaughan, and Christopher Dove, as well as Mark Weldon, Joan Weldon and Naomi Vega. Also, on or about 12/5/24 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit of Violated Constitutional Rights by Unlawful Tribunal and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., Pamela L. Brooks, James P. Fisher, Neil Gorsuch, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Glenn Youngkin, Jason Miyares, Winsome Earle-Sears, Bob Anderson, Rosemarie Annunziata, Jessica Aber, Michael Chapman, Don Scott, Lorrie Anne Sinclair Taylor, L. Louise Lucas, Spencer Beckman, Alexander E. Morgan, Stephanie Sauer, Elizabeth Vaughan, and Christopher Dove, as well as Mark Weldon, Joan Weldon and Naomi Vega. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Marbury V. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) Pg. 177: ... Certainly all those who have framed written constitutions contemplate them as forming the fundamental and paramount law of the nation, and consequently the theory of every such government must be, that an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void. ... (Excerpt)
There is therefore, Secondly, another way whereby Governments are dissolved, and that is, when the Legislative, or the Prince, either of them, act contrary to their Trust. First, The Legislative acts against the Trust reposed in them, when they endeavour to invade the Property of the Subject, and to make themselves, or any part of the Community, Masters, or Arbitrary Disposers of the Lives, Liberties, or Fortunes of the People. Two Treatises of Government, Essay by John Locke, Chapter XIX, Section 221.
Maxim of Law: Where the law prescribes a form, the nonobservance of it is fatal to the proceeding, and the whole becomes a nullity.
Maxim of Law: Let right [or justice] be done, though the heavens should fall. And;
Please take Notice on or about 12/19/24 Katryn A. Vega and on or about 1/7/25 James Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted notices; Notice and Constitutional Demand for Judges to Notice the Constitution; Supreme Court of the United States, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Pamela L. Brooks, Donald J. Trump, Elon Musk, Vivak Ramaswamy, S. Bernard Goodwyn, and Rosemarie Annunziata. Then, on or about 1/7/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted notices; Notice of Awareness Between Certiorari and Actions of Right and Notice of the People's Awareness in Regard to Comity Doctrines; S. Bernard Goodwyn, Rosemarie Annunziata, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., Pamela L.Brooks, James P. Fisher, Jason S. Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Don Scott, L. Louise Lucas, Bob Anderson, Jessica D. Aber, Michael L. Chapman, Lorrie Ann Sinclair Taylor. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Loper Bright Enterprises V. Raimondo, 603 U.S.___(2024) Gorsuch concurring. Pg. 1 Today, the Court places a tombstone on Chevron no one can miss. ... Instead, the Constitution promises, the American people are sovereign and they alone may, through democratically responsive processes, amend our foundational charter or revise federal legislation. Unelected judges enjoy no such power. ... The constrained view of the judicial power that runs through our Constitution carries with it familiar implications, ones the framers readily acknowledged. James Madison, for example, proclaimed that it would be a "fallacy" to suggest that judges or their precedents could "repeal or alter" the Constitution or the laws of the United States. (Excerpts)
Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch explains further, the failure of government actors to give the very same due process of law based on already settled maxims of law, lack of juries, that judges are wearing robes but not acting judicially, showing that there are bad processes of evidence in tribunals. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Link 1) https://youtu.be/sHdSXNkqcf0?si=cK0f1A2ZYdgE2hH
Maxim of Law: Every general principle [or maxim of law] is its own pledge or warrant; and things that are clearly true are not to be proved.
Maxim of Law: Principles prove, they are not proved. Fundamental principles require no proof; or, in Lord Coke's words, "they ought to be approved, because they cannot be proved." And;
Please take Notice on or about 1/3/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit/Contract of Danger of Continued Maladministration, Malfeasance and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; John G. Roberts, Jr., Pamela L. Brooks, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Jason S. Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Don Scott, L. Louise Lucas, Neil Gorsuch, Bob Anderson, Michael L. Chapman, Jessica D. Aber, Lorrie Ann Sinclair Taylor, and Rosemarie Annunziata. Also, on or about 1/7/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit/Contract of Danger of Continued Maladministration, Malfeasance and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; Spencer S. Beckman, Alexander E. Morgan, John G. Roberts, Jr., Pamela L. Brooks, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Jason S. Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Don Scott, L. Louise Lucas, Neil Gorsuch, Bob Anderson, Michael L. Chapman, Jessica D. Aber, Lorrie Ann Sinclair Taylor, Rosemarie Annunziata. Later, on or about 1/28/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit /Contract of Danger of Continued Maladministration, Malfeasance, Breach of Oath and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; John G. Roberts, Jr., Pamela L. Brooks, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Jason S. Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Don Scott, L. Louise Lucas, Neil Gorsuch, Bob Anderson, Michael L. Chapman, Jessica D. Aber, Lorrie Ann Sinclair Taylor, Rosemarie Annunziata, Mark Warner, Timothy Kaine, and Suhas Subramanyam. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1: ... No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (Excerpt)
Maxim of Law: In the court of chancery (equity) a man shall not be prejudiced by his mispleading, or defect of form, but according to the truth of the matter; for the decision should be made according to conscience and not according to the rigor of the law.
Maxim of Law: Punishment is due if the words of an oath be false. And;
Please take Notice on or about 1/31/25 James Vega and Katryn A.Vega sent the following servants copies of the unrebutted affidavit AFFIDAVIT AS APPELLANTS REQUIRING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA; Court of Appeals of Virginia via A. John Vollino, Clerk of Court. Then on or about 2/17/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted notice; Notice of Demand to Immediately Create a Department of Restoration of the People; Donald J. Trump, Pamela Bondi, and Elon Musk. And, later on or about 3/11/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted affidavits; Affidavit of Maladministration, Breach of Oath and Constitutional Demand for Remedy; S. Bernard Goodwyn, Jason S. Miyares, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Don Scott, L. Louise Lucas, Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Jr., Bob Anderson, Michael L. Chapman, Jessica D. Aber, and Rosemarie Annunziata. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
SEC V. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. 109 (2024) Syllabus, Pg. 4 On that basis, we have repeatedly explained that matters concerning private rights may not be removed from Article III courts. ... Gorsuch and Thomas concurring, Pg. 1 The Seventh Amendment's jury-trial right does not work alone. It operates together with Article III and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to limit how the government may go about depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property. The Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to trial by jury. Article III entitles individuals to an independent judge who will preside over that trial. And due process promises any trial will be held in accord with time-honored principles. Taken together, all three provisions vindicate the Constitution's promise of a "fair trial in a fair tribunal." ... Pg. 10 It provided that the government may not deprive anyone of "life, liberty, or property, without due a process of law." ,,,That is, if the government sought to interfere with those rights, nothing less than "the process and proceedings of the common law" had to be observed before any such deprivation could take place. ... This constitutional baseline was designed to serve as "a restraint on the legislative" branch, preventing Congress from "mak[ing] any process 'due process of law,' by its mere will." Pg. 14 A hallmark that we have looked to in determining if a suit concerns private rights is whether it "is made of 'the stuff of the traditional actions at common law tried by the courts at Westminster in 1789.' If a suit is in the nature of an action at common law, then the matter presumptively concerns private rights, and adjudication by an Article III court is mandatory (Bolded for emphasis) (Excerpts)
Maxim of Law: Lapse of time does not bar the commonwealth.
Maxim of Law: Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin. And;
Please take Notice on or about 6/20/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted notices; Loudoun, Va Notice Regarding Full Disclosure and Access to the People's Information; Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Pamela L. Brooks, Stephen E. Sincavage, Erik S. Siebert, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Elizabeth Vaughan, Pamela Bondi, Alexander E. Morgan, Spencer Beckman, Stephanie Sauer, Christopher Dove, Charles F. Koehler, Avelina S. Jacob, Jeanette A. Irby, Robert Vernail, Jason S. Miyares, Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Jr., Bob Anderson, and Rosemarie Annunziata. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Virginia Constitution Article I, Section 15: Qualities Necessary to Preservation of Free Government That no free government, nor the blessings of liberty, can be preserved to any people, but by a firm adherence to justice, moderation, temperance, frugality, and virtue; by frequent recurrence to fundamental principles; and by the recognition by all citizens that they have duties as well as rights, and that such rights cannot be enjoyed save in a society where law is respected and due process is observed. (Excerpt)
The Declaration of Independence. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness ...(Excerpt)
Maxim of Law: The main object of government is the protection and preservation of personal rights, private property, and public liberties, and upholding the law of God.
Maxim of Law: Supreme power can dissolve itself. And;
Please take Notice the People have realized that the lower court "tribunals" are not acting according to their granted Constitutional authority, are using arbitrary "capricious laws" and abusing their discretion. On or about 7/14/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of unrebutted notices: The People's Awareness Between Certiorari and Actions of Right and Notice of the People's Awareness in Regard to Comity Doctrines; Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Pamela L. Brooks, Stephen E. Sincavage, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Maria Graff Decker, Rosemarie Annunziata, Avelina S. Jacob, Jeanette A. Irby, Don Scott, Lorrie Anne Sinclair, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Michael L. Chapman, L. Louise Lucas, Erik S. Siebert, Jason Miyares, Bob Anderson, Mark Davis. Lastly, on or about 7/18/25 James Vega and Katryn A. Vega sent the following servants copies of an unrebutted notice; Notice and Constitutional Demand for Judges to Notice the Constitution; Donald J. Trump, Pamela Bondi, Douglas L. Fleming, Jr., James P. Fisher, Pamela L. Brooks, Stephen E. Sincavage, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Mark Davis, Erik S. Siebert, S. Bernard Goodwyn, Maria Graff Decker, Rosemarie Annunziata, Jason Miyares, Bob Anderson, Glenn Youngkin, Winsome Earle-Sears, Don Scott, L. Louise Lucas, Avenlina S. Jacob, Jeanette A. Irby, Lorrie Anne Sinclair, Michael L. Chapman, and Charles F. Koehler. (Bolded for emphasis) (See evidence below)
Sun Valley Orchards LLC V. United States Department of Labor, No. 23-2608 (3d Cir. 2025) Pg. 10 ...The District Court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. "A district court's order dismissing a complaint is subject to plenary review." ... Under the Administrative Procedure Act, we must "hold unlawful and set aside" DOL's action if we find it to be, among other things, "arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law"; "contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity"; or "in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right." ... We begin and end with Sun Valley's Article III argument. The Constitution vests "[t]he judicial Power of the United States in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." U.S. Const. art. 3, § 1. The judges of those courts enjoy life tenure and salary protection, attributes that preserve an "independent spirit" that is "essential to the faithful performance" of their duty. The Federalist No. 78, p. 469 (C. Rossiter ed. 1961) (A. Hamilton). Because non-Article III tribunals lack these important qualities, Congress may not "withdraw from judicial cognizance any matter which, from its nature, is the subject of a suit at the common law, or in equity, or admiralty." Pg.14 ... The SupremeCourt has long maintained that "[a] civil penalty was a type of remedy at common law that could only be enforced in courts of law." ... That DOL sought punitive remedies therefore only confirms that its action was "made of the stuff of the traditional actions at common law," presumptively entitling Sun Valley to adjudication before an Article III court... (Excerpts)
Virginia Constitution, Article 1, Section 3: Government Instituted for Common Benefit That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
POSITIVE LAW. Law actually and specifically enacted or adopted by proper authority for the government of an organized jural society. "A 'law,' in the sense in which that term is employed in jurisprudence, is enforced by a sovereign political authority. It is thus distinguished not only from all rules which, like the principles of morality and the so-called laws of honor and of fashion, are enforced by an indeterminate authority, but also from all rules enforced by a determinate authority which is either, on the one hand, super- human, or, on the other hand, politically subordinate. In order to emphasize the fact that 'laws,' in the strict sense of the term, are thus authoritatively imposed, they are described as positive laws." Black's Law 4th Edition
Maxim of Law: Individual liberties are antecedent to all government.
Maxim of Law: No freeman shall be deprived of life, liberty or property but by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land - that is the common law.
Trump V. United States, 603 U.S. ___ (2024) ... there is no immunity for unofficial acts….(Excerpt)
Maxim of Law: Contracts receive legal sanction from the agreement of the parties.
Maxim of Law: If one has the power to prohibit or prevent a thing but does not, it is as though he did the thing himself.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/v5z66lfdln2tm82l3vbuz/AE-UiPvkZO1lbo9nBqgYAX0?rlkey=m6dcfcz5poqt9irfg8gtmz98y&dl=0 Evidence link (viewable only, until 11-30-2025.) And;
Please take Final Notice it is my wish, order and demand the Supreme Court file a Writ of Certiorari, a Writ of Error, and a Writ of Habeas Corpus, by necessity, regarding Chase Caleb Vega, son of James and Katryn A. Vega, due to non-compliance with the federal rules and procedures required in the Article III jurisdiction, of the lower courts when dealing with our Inherent Constitutional Rights of Liberty and Property. Also, all servants and trustees listed in this Notice immediately return any/all property of James and Katryn A. Vega, approximately, $162,297.90 as well as the monies due from the unrebutted Notices and Affidavits and any equitable relief deemed justifiable, as of the received date of this Notice, and cease and desist abrogating/warring against the Peoples' Inherent Constitutional Right to Due Process of Law, under the Common Law, in a Court of Record. If you believe any of these statements to be false, rebut by Affidavit, sworn under penalty of perjury, point by point, within seven (7) days of receiving this Notice, showing your grant of authority to deprive, usurp, or violate the Peoples' Inherent Constitutional Rights, or you agree, by tacit acquiescence, that all statements herein are true and shall be heard by an arbitrator of my choice. Furthermore, you will be held individually liable to pay $1,000,000.00 (one million dollars) per infringement of the Peoples' Inherent Constitutional Rights, causing irreparable harm and undo burden. Any further actions will show you are acting with full knowledge, intent, and malice trespassing on the Peoples' Inherent Rights, and that no court shall rehear this matter, but it shall stand as evidence, truth and law in all courts of record. (Anyone suppressing this Notice agrees to pay $30,000) (A response from an attorney not directly addressed by this Notice will be considered a non-response)