• EAPOS2025 Evaluation of Individual Sessions / Workshops

  • Scores:

    1) Poor        2) Fair         3) Good       4) Very good         5) Excellent

  • 1. Scientific Content

  • Was the content relevant to your clinical practice?*
  • 2. Speakers

  • Were the speakers knowledgeable and engaging?*
  • 3. Timing

  • Was the allocated time for each talk appropriate?*
  • 4. Diversity & Balance of Topics

  • 5. Interaction

  • Was there enough opportunity for Q&A and audience interaction?*
  • 6. Overall Rating of This Session

  • Should be Empty: