EAPOS2025 Evaluation Survey

EAPOS2025 Evaluation Survey
Scores:

1) Poor 2) Fair 3) Good 4) Very good 5) Excellent
Full Name*
Mobile Number*
Email*
example@example.com
Place Of Work*
Section 1 — Overall Conference Evaluation
1. Scientific Program
Overall scientific quality:*

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
Was the program balanced (pediatric ophthalmology + strabismus + updates)?*

YesSomewhatNo
2. Venue
How do you rate the venue (location, hall, acoustics, visibility)?*

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
3. Organization
Registration and transportation process: *

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
Time management overall:*

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
Communication before and during meeting:*

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
4. Social & Networking Atmosphere
How would you rate the social and networking environment?*

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
5. Exhibitors & Industry Interaction
How do you rate the exhibition area and industry participation?*

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Worst, 5 is Best
6. Overall Satisfaction
Overall, how satisfied were you with the meeting?*

UnsatisfiedNeutralSatisfiedExtremely Satisfied
What was the best part of the meeting? & What should be improved next time?*
Section 2 — Preferences for Next Meeting
Preferred City for Next EAPOS Meeting*

CairoAlexandriaOther city
Please specify*
Preferred Format*

Two-day conferenceOne-day intensive programMore workshopsMore case-based sessions
Suggestions for Future Topics*
Should be Empty:

Section 1 — Overall Conference Evaluation