Conflict of Interest Policy
Anyone making decisions on behalf of Street Law, Inc. should always act based on the best interests of the organization, and no individual associated with Street Law, Inc. should use their position for personal benefit, for the benefit of friends or relatives, or to further any outside interests or personal agenda. This standard applies to all transactions and decisions, whether or not covered by the detailed policies and procedures below.
This policy applies to any person who is a director, officer, member of a committee, or staff member of Street Law, Inc. (an “interested person”).
Definition
A potential conflict of interest exists whenever the professional or financial interest of an interested person is opposed to that of the organization, or when such an interest or any conflicting fiduciary duty might influence the interested person’s actions and judgment on behalf of Street Law, Inc. A potential conflict also exists when there is an appearance that an interested person’s actions may be influenced by a competing interest or duty.
A conflict of interest exists whenever an interested person’s competing interest or fiduciary duty is substantial enough that the interested person cannot be expected to exercise independent judgment and take action in the best interest of Street Law, Inc.
Conflicts of interest most frequently arise in (but are in no way limited to) the following contexts:
- Decisions about an interested person’s compensation (as a contractor or employee);
- Decisions about transactions with entities in which an interested person holds an ownership interest;
- Decisions about transactions with an entity by which an interested person is employed;
- Acceptance of gifts or any other item of value from any person or entity who may be seeking special treatment; and
- Use of Street Law’s equipment, materials, or property for personal or third-party gain.
Conflicts (or the appearance of conflicts) may also arise when Street Law, Inc. is contemplating a transaction with a close relative or domestic partner of an interested person, or any entity in which such a related person has an ownership interest or which employs such a person.
Conflicts of interest should not be considered to arise when the potential benefit to the interested person is tenuous or remote, such as an interested person with investments in a mutual fund that holds a small amount of stock in a particular company. The fact that an interested person is also a director, officer, member, or volunteer for a nonprofit organization that obtains or seeks funds from institutions or individuals from which Street Law, Inc. also obtains or seeks funds will not by itself be deemed to be a conflict of interest.
Procedure: Board of Directors
Whenever a director, officer, or committee member becomes aware of a potential conflict of interest, whether financial or otherwise, they shall make the situation known to the board or committee chair (as the case might be) and provide all facts material to understanding the nature and scope of the conflict, including whether the interested person believes their ability to make an independent decision based solely on the best interest of Street Law, Inc. has been compromised. If the interested person involved does not make this disclosure, another director or committee member with knowledge of the potential conflict should draw it to the body’s attention.
The interested person with the potential conflict must retire from the meeting and not participate in the final discussion and voting on the existence of the conflict. If a conflict is found to exist, the interested person may be invited to provide any relevant information that could be of use to the board in making its decision, but shall again retire and not participate in the final discussion and voting regarding the transaction.
The board or committee’s decision shall be based on consideration of whether the transaction
- Is in the organization’s best interest and for its own benefit
- Is fair and reasonable to the organization
- Is the most advantageous transaction or arrangement the organization can obtain with reasonable efforts under the circumstances.
Procedure: Staff
Whenever a staff member becomes aware of a potential conflict of interest in an area where they exercise any discretion in carrying out their duties for Street Law, Inc., the employee shall promptly disclose the potential conflict to an immediate supervisor, who will in turn inform their senior management team (SMT) liaison. If the CEO has a potential conflict, they must disclose it to the board chair. The SMT liaison, or the board chair in the case of the CEO, will determine whether there is a conflict that requires recusal of the interested person. When a conflict is found to exist, the interested person shall provide the SMT liaison or board chair with all information they have that is relevant to any decision to be made in which they have an interest, and the final decision shall be made by the SMT liaison or board chair.