To: Wendy Rogers (Arizona Legislature)
To: Mark Finchem (Arizona Legislature)
To: Donald Trump (President of the United States)
To: Arizona Supreme Court
To: Neil Gorsuch (Supreme Court Justice)
The People’s Understanding of Fundamental Law Regarding CPS and Void Orders
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, __________________________, one of the People, as recognized in the constitutions of all 50 states, present this notice as a grievance and demand for restoration regarding an attack on the People by unlawful tribunals that use a common practice to remove children from parents without right, as expressed by Arizona Legislature member Wendy Rogers; and,
Please take notice that the People have assembled and spent time studying the fundamental and historical law that the Supreme Court has recognized, which many attorneys and government actors have been bypassing while casting unlawful “judgment” against the People; and,
Please take notice that Arizona Constitution Article 6, Section 30 requires Courts of Record in the Superior Court, which by definition in Black’s Law Dictionary (4th Edition) necessitates a trial by jury, an independent magistrate, as well as proceeding according to the common law as judicial tribunals. Arizona and other states have failed to use these constitutional guarantees and have taken children into for-profit programs with Child Protective Services, thereby creating multi-step approaches to justice that have been prohibited since the Supreme Court Breun case; and,
Please take notice that any legislative fiat that allowed CPS and judges working to carry out their schemes could in no way create valid judicial orders, as they failed to follow the proper form that all government servants agree to follow in the Bills or Declarations of Rights in all 50 states. Therefore, such actions can only be deemed without jurisdiction and void orders, which must be declared unlawful, and there must be a restoration of children to the People or actions taken to make the People whole (see evidence below):
Maxim: Where the law prescribes a form, the non-observance of it is fatal to the proceeding, and the whole becomes a nullity.
Please take notice that, as Wendy Rogers explained, attorneys and judges have worked together to bypass that which is due to the People by guaranteed rights declared in the Federal and State Constitutions, which stand as encroachments against the People who had no knowledge of the settled maxims (see evidence below):
“A Selection of Maxims of Law” by Charles A. Weisman, Preface excerpt:
“If one fails to understand the fundamental principles of law, then there is no end to which he can be misled or deceived about what is right and what is wrong. Such a person could easily become the subject of government encroachments, or be maneuvered into surrendering his rights.”
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is our wish, order, and demand that this practice be declared unconstitutional, void, and unlawful immediately, and that actions be taken to return unlawfully taken children immediately. Furthermore, we demand that the Supreme Court of the United States immediately accept habeas corpus with original jurisdiction, by necessity, without any rules or interference, so that parents may have their children returned should any state fail to supply justice. Officers of the Supreme Court should also openly denounce the practices of actors taking children without true due process of law based on the sanctioned maxims.
Failure to respond as state actors within 10 days, showing lawful authority for taking children without constitutionally guaranteed safeguards, shall be considered as purposeful harm and warfare against the constitutions and the People, without right and with full knowledge, malice, and intent.
This notice is sent to you in the peace and love of Christ so that you may repair the many breaches of trust against the People.