System Gaps
What is the most significant gap in Oregon’s post‑conviction support system?
Which option do you prefer?
*
Limited access to SB 819 relief pathways.
Lack of trauma‑informed, culturally grounded advocacy.
Inconsistent or outdated risk/needs assessments.
Barriers for justice‑impacted women seeking reentry support.
Back
Next
Which intervention has the greatest impact on reducing recidivism and improving long‑term outcomes?
High‑quality mitigation packet development.
Independent, evidence‑based risk assessments.
Survivor‑centered restorative justice processes.
Community‑based healing and reentry supports.
All the above
Back
Next
Which investment would most improve outcomes for justice‑impacted women in Oregon?
Risk Assessments.
SB 819 filings.
Sentence relief and mitigation pathways.
Trauma informed advocacy and navigation.
All the above.
How familiar are you with Oregon’s post‑conviction relief options (SB 819, clemency, etc.)?
Very familiar.
Somewhat familiar.
Not familiar.
I didn’t know these options existed.
What is the biggest barrier preventing eligible individuals from accessing post‑conviction relief in Oregon?
Lack of legal advocacy capacity.
Confusing or inaccessible relief processes.
No culturally specific support services.
Financial or logistical barriers.
All the above
Back
Next
If a culturally grounded, trauma‑informed access‑to‑justice program were available in Oregon, would you use it?
Yes, absolutely.
Possibly, depending on my situation.
I’m not sure.
No, I wouldn’t use it.
Submit
Should be Empty: