Clone of 2019/20 QBVT Player Survey + Awards Voting

2025/26 QBVT Player Survey

+ Awards Voting

Responses by 19 April please
Your Name*

Given NameSurname
MaleFemale
Senior (Premier/Challenger/Aspiring)u17 Junioru15 Junior

How do you rate each of the following:*

Rows	Strongly Disagree	Disagree	Neutral	Agree	Strongly Agree
Information on tournaments was easily accessible and timely
QBVT offered a good geographic distribution of tournaments
There were an appropriate number of tournaments
The process for entering tournaments is easy and accessible
Changes to tournaments (e.g.locations,draws) were well communicated
I am aware of the mechanism for athletes to provide feedback about QBVT
QBVT provides athletes value for money
Male and Female players were treated equally
The facilities and equipment at the tournaments were suitable for a State-level event
Each tournament draw was easy to follow and transparent

*** Special Note***

If you completed feedback for the recent VQ Competition Review (thank you) please feel free to jump straight to the Player Awards Voting
What did you like best about the tournaments you DID play?
What were the reasons for you choosing NOT to play certain tournaments?
Do you have any ideas which would improve the QBVT next year or further comments?
QBVT Player Awards Voting
- Best Female Attacker
- Best Female Defender
- Best Female Blocker
- Best Female Setter
- Best Female Passer
- Best Female Server
- Female Player's Player
- Female Most Improved Player
- Female Most Valuable Player
- Best Male Attacker
- Best Male Defender
- Best Male Blocker
- Best Male Setter
- Best Male Passer
- Best Male Server
- Male Player's Player
- Male Most Improved Player
- Male Most Valuable Player
- u17 Girls: Most Valuable Player
- u17 Girls: Most Improved Player
- u17 Boys: Most Valuable Player
- u17 Boys: Most Improved Player
- u15 Girls: Most Valuable Player
- u15 Girls: Most Improved Player
- u15 Boys: Most Valuable Player
- u15 Boys: Most Improved Player
- Best Tournament
- Should be Empty: