• Performance Review Spring 2026 - Engineering

    This review is structured around our four core values. Select your role below - you will only see the section relevant to you.This is our beta version. Your feedback on the process itself is welcome at the end.

  • Instructions: (Text to be added)

  • Our Core Values

    Our company values shape a unique software engineering culture built on functional programming principles: clarity, composability, and thoughtful collaboration. They help us make better decisions, write more maintainable systems, and create a shared standard for how we work together.

    • Own Your Work — We succeed when we can rely on each other.

    • Don't Settle for Superficial — Strive for deep understanding of problems, constraints, and solutions.

    • Be Honest Proactively — If you need help, perceive a risk, or have a problem, talk to your team.

    • Get to It — Focus on actionable next steps that create positive impact.

  • Our Rating Scale

    Our rating scale is based on impact because impact focuses on outcomes rather than effort or intent. The core question is: Did this person make the system, team, or client outcomes meaningfully better during this period?

    1 — Negative Impact: Work created avoidable friction, risk, or setbacks for the team or project.
    2 — Limited Impact: Work was completed, but had limited broader impact; more development is needed.
    3 — Solid Impact: Reliable contributor who met commitments and supported team success.
    4 — Strong Positive Impact: Consistently delivered high-quality work and strengthened project outcomes.
    5 — Exceptional Impact: Work materially improved systems, team capability, or client outcomes, creating lasting positive change.

  • Select Your Role for this performance review*

  • Team Member Self-Reflection Input

    The self-reflection is for you to evaluate their work during the review period. Thoughtful reflection helps identify successes, lessons learned, and areas for growth. Team members are encouraged to answer questions such as: What accomplishments or successes would you like to highlight? What could you have done differently to be more effective? What do you want to accomplish in the next year?How would you rate your overall performance impact for this period?
  • Rows
  • Rows
  • Rows
  • Overall, how would you assess your technical and project contributions for this performance period?*

  • Development Planning and Support

  • A paragraph on what to include in this section for your development

  • Technical Assessment

  • Rows
  • Overall, how would you assess the technical contributions for this performance period?*

  • Client Delivery and Project Team Assessment

  • Rows
  • Overall, how would you assess the client delivery and team collaboration contributions for this performance period?*

  • Ratings Summary

  • Summary of the Team Members self-assessment on core values, technical contribution, and client delivery and team collaboration.  

  • This section summarizes the technical requirements ratings, emphasizing code quality, problem solving, collaboration, and adaptability across the review period.

  • This section summarizes the client delivery and team collaboration for this performance period. 

  • Thank you for taking the time to complete your portion of this peer evaluation. Before submitting, please take a moment to carefully review your responses to ensure they are accurate and complete. Once you are satisfied with your answers, click the “Submit” button below to finalize your evaluation.

    After all participants have completed their assessments, the feedback will be compiled and shared as part of a performance and development discussion. Your input is appreciated and plays an important role in this process.

  • Should be Empty: