Notice of Demand to Show Clean Hands and Federal Funds/Partnerships
Relating to Data Centers
Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal and Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent
I, one of the People of the 50 American States, (as seen in the Indiana Constitution Article I Section 1) Sui Juris, do provide you this Notice that you and your agents may provide immediate due care, by necessity;
Please take Notice that I declare that the People have all political power and inalienable rights to life, liberty, property and the pursuit of happiness as seen in all 50 State Constitutions. Individual liberties are antecedent to all government. The People have assembled across the state, to consult for their common good and to instruct their Trustees for redress of grievances, correcting maladministration. The main purpose of government is to guarantee and protect the People’s happiness, safety and property. (See evidence below)
Indiana Constitution, Article 1 The Bill of Rights Section 1: Inherent Rights
WE DECLARE, That all people are created equal; that they are endowed by their CREATOR with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; that all power is inherent in the people; and that all free governments are, and of right ought to be, founded on their authority, and is instituted for their peace, safety, and well being. For the advancement of these ends, the people have at all times an indefeasible right to alter and reform their government.
Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 31: The Right of Assemblage and Petition
No law shall restrain any of the inhabitants of the State from assembling together in a peaceable manner, to consult for their common good; nor from instructing their representatives; nor from applying to the General Assembly for redress of grievances.
Maxim of Law 51i. Individual liberties are antecedent to all government. C.L.M.
Please take Notice that the Trustees swore to protect and defend Indiana’s heritage, to preserve for the public good, future and posteriety of the People. The government does not determine what public good is or not. The law was written by the People and government is organized by the written text in the constitutons. Therefore, the People determine the public good. It is the duty of the Trustees to protect these exclusive rights of the People to hunt and fish on their land, valuing Indiana’s heritage. It will be considered a direct violation of your Oath by moving forward with this commerce activity of building Data Centers. The People have sent Notices requesting to see the testing results of agency assessments (see below) for the effects on the environmental, social and economic aspects of Data Centers. As Trustees, are you disregarding the sworn duties of your Oath, by not providing to the People, results of any of the reports and evaluations below? Have any of the below evaluations been met? These agencies were created by the State and Federal government to protect the Peoples land, air, and water.
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), additionally Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.); the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.); the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.); the Toxic Substances Control Act (15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.) Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544) (ESA); Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM), Office of Water Quality (OWQ), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the Indiana Lake Preservation Act. (See evidence below)
Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 39:
(a) The right to hunt, fish and harvest wildlife: (1) is valued art of Indiana’s heritage: and (2) shall be forever preserved for the public good. (b) The people have a right, which includes the right to use traditional methods, to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife, subject only to the laws prescribed by the General Assembly and rules prescribed by virtue of the authority of the General Assembly to: (1) promote wildlife conservation and management: and (2) preserve the future of hunting and fishing. (c) Hunting and fishing shall be a preferred means of managing and controlling wildlife. (d) This scetion shall not be construed to limit the application of any provision of law relating to trespass or property rights.
Black’s Law Dictionary 5th Edition – Heritage - In the civil law, every species of immovable which can be the subject of property; such as lands, houses, orchards, woods, marshes, ponds, etc., in whatever mode they may have been acquired, either by descent or purchase.
South Carolina Constitution Declaration of Rights Article I Section 25: Right to Hunt and Fish
The traditions of hunting and fishing are valuable parts of the state's heritage, important for conservation, and a protected means of managing nonthreatened wildlife. The citizens of this State have the right to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife traditionally pursued, subject to laws and regulations promoting sound wildlife conservation and management as prescribed by the General Assembly. Nothing in this section shall be construed to abrogate any private property rights, existing state laws or regulations, or the state's sovereignty over its natural resources.
Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights Section 21:
Right of public to hunt, fish and trap wildlife. The people have the right to hunt, fish and trap, including by the use of traditional methods, subject to reasonable laws and regulations that promote wildlife conservation and management and that preserve the future of hunting and fishing. Public hunting and fishing shall be a preferred means of managing and controlling wildlife. This section shall not be construed to modify any provision of law relating to trespass, property rights or water resources.
Maxim of Law 70j. Every person has exclusive dominion over the soil which he absolutely owns; hence such an owner of land has the exclusive right of hunting and fishing on his land, and the waters covering it. L. Realty Co. v. Johnson, 92 Minn. 363, 365.
Take Notice that the laws are to be faithfully executed by those entrusted with the power to oversee the Trust acting with diligence to protect the inherent rights of the People/Beneficiaries. The weakness and folly of the Trustees/Fiduciaries acting contrary to their purpose as written in the Trust Indentures/Constitutions, will be considered negligent. Any agreement for financial benefit from federal programs may be a gross conflict of interest giving you unclean hands. Any entity involved with Programs under administrative funding to benefit a special class or individuals, will be considered bad and disfavored in law. Furthermore, there is another element of wrong being committed when you are working in federal programs and make money outside of your normal salary for carrying out the functions of that program, leaving one with unclean hands and maladministration. (See evidence below)
Maxim of Law 71v. Law favors diligence, and therefore hates folly and negligence. Wing. Max. p. 665, max.172; Finch, Law, b.1, c.3, no.70.
Maxim of Law 60j. A hidden intention is bad and disfavored in law. 2 Bulstr. 179.
Virginia Constitution Bill of Rights Article I Section 3: Government Instituted for Common Benefit
That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security of the people, nation, or community; of all the various modes and forms of government, that is best which is capable of producing the greatest degree of happiness and safety, and is most effectually secured against the danger of maladministration; and, whenever any government shall be found inadequate or contrary to these purposes, a majority of the community hath an indubitable, inalienable, and indefeasible right to reform, alter, or abolish it, in such manner as shall be judged most conducive to the public weal.
Take further Notice that Governor Braun you swore in good faith to take care that all laws are to be executed by the mandatory laws provided in the Indiana Constitution. Failure to faithfully execute your Oath will be considered maladministration. Governor Braun, the People instruct you to bring forth a public statement about the People’s grievances regarding building Data Centers throughout Indiana and provide reports and evaluations from the entities listed above showing the environmental and related social and economic effects of building Data Centers in this state. (See evidence below)
Indiana Constitution Article 5 Executive Section 16 Execution of Laws:
The Governor shall take care that the laws are faithfully executed.
Indiana Constitution Article 1 Section 25: Laws—Taking Effect
No law shall be passed, the taking effect of which shall be made to depend upon the authority, except as provided in this Constitution.
Maxim of Law 50c. Good faith demands that what is agreed upon shall be done. Dig. 19, 20, 21; Id. 50, 8. 2, 13.
Maxim of Law 50d. Good faith must be observed. Coolidge v. Brigham, 1 Metc. (Mass.) 547, 551.
Maxim of Law 84 c. Punishment is due if the words of an Oath be false. Black’s , 840.
Please take final Notice that for the public good, it is my wish, order and demand that all parties must give full disclosure of any/all program funds, received by any state, municipal, town or political subdivision as part of any program to build any/all Data Centers. The People as Trust Protectors, demand that you show clean hands or you may have harmed the People by Breach of Trust. You were given specific grievances through Notices and Petitions, to protect Indiana’s heritage, to preserve for the public good, future and posteriety of the People. The People have redressed their grievances and instructed you and by ignoring the People and thinking you can determine the public good is contrary to the People’s rights is maladministration. Trespassing the rights of the People will be an admission that you knowingly, maliciously and willfully are trampling the rights and liberties of the People and warring against the Constitutions. Remedy shall be had by fixing the redress of grievances brought by the People and following their instructions sent in all Notices; provide transparency of reports and evaluations from the entities listed above showing the environmental and related social and economic effects of building Data Centers in this state; Governor Braun is to bring forth a public statement about the People’s grievances regarding building Data Centers in Indiana and cease and desist any and all data centers in Indiana for the public good.
If you believe any of the above claims are untrue please show the Constitutional Provisions where you were granted authority to trespass my rights. Any man or any woman who decides to suppress this Notice agrees to pay $500,000, per infraction and any disputes by any public officials or private actors who are bound by contract to the Indiana Constitution, agrees to have these matters heard before an arbitrator of my choice, at your expense, and to be bound thereby. Any man or woman denying these claims are true must rebut by affidavit, sworn under the penalty of perjury, point by point, within 10 days of receiving this Notice or you agree, by acquiescence, all statements in this Notice are to be truth and fact. Failing to respond with constitutionally granted authority which gave you the power to disregard my rights mentioned within this Notice, means that you agree to have this Notice used against you as evidence of maladministration. You further agree once the 10 day time period is up, this Notice becomes truth and law and that all matters must be considered adjudged and that no court has jurisdiction to rehear these matters.
Maxim of Law 92aa. The deprivation of any rights may be punished. Cummings v. Missouri, 4 Wall. (71 U.S.) 277, 320.
This Notice is sent to you in peace and the love of Christ, so that by necessity you may provide due care to those who hold all political power, We the People.