Bridges, Not Barriers: Campus Strategies for Equity Centered Mental Health Outreach
Post-session evaluation for CE activities. Complete all ratings using the 1–5 scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
Session Details
Session Title
*
Date
*
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Presenter(s)
*
Section A: Learning Objective Achievement
As a participant, please respond to the below with how accurately you are able to implement the learning objectives.
Rate how well the session enables participants to identify and honor the shared experiences and challenges of mental health professionals leading outreach initiatives to foster collective understanding and solidarity amid shifting sociopolitical pressures.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Rate how well the session teaches relevant considerations, practical tools, and innovative approaches shared by panelists to sustain equity-centered mental health outreach within participants' own institutional contexts.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Rate how well the session reinforces participants' commitment to sustaining equitable, social-justice-oriented outreach services so marginalized student populations continue to receive needed support during this period of heightened sociopolitical pressure.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section B: Content Quality and Relevance
The content of the session was relevant to my field of interest.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The content of the session demonstrated evidence-based resources.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section C: Presenter Effectiveness
The presenter demonstrated expertise in the topic(s) discussed.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter was clear and effective in delivering the content of the session.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter engaged the audience well during the session.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section D: Overall Evaluation
Instructional level was appropriate
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall satisfaction with the session
*
Very Unsatisfied
1
2
3
4
Very Satisfied
5
1 is Very Unsatisfied, 5 is Very Satisfied
I would recommend this session to colleagues
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section E: Open-Ended Feedback
Most valuable aspect / takeaway
Suggestions for improvement
Future topics of interest
Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification
Participant Name
*
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
*
example@example.com
License Type
License Number
Confirmation of Attendance
*
I confirm I attended the session
Signature
*
Attendance Date
*
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Submit Evaluation
Submit Evaluation
Should be Empty: