Session Evaluation: Beyond One-Size-Fits-All

Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: A Layered Approach to Campus Suicide Prevention Session Evaluation

Post-session evaluation for CE activities. Complete all ratings using the 1–5 scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
Session Details
Session Title
Date

MonthDayYear
Date
Presenter(s)
Section A: Learning Objective Achievement

As a participant, please respond to the below with how accurately you are able to implement the learning objectives.
Rate the extent to which the session enabled you to identify and describe the core components of a comprehensive, public health–informed approach to campus suicide prevention, including promoting resilience and protective factors (e.g., social connectedness, life skills), strengthening early identification and help-seeking pathways, ensuring access to clinical and crisis services, and implementing environmental safety strategies including means restriction.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Rate the extent to which the session enabled you to examine and apply evidence-based, multimodal outreach and prevention strategies (such as peer-led programming, gatekeeper training, screening, integrated messaging, and means restrictions) and to evaluate how multidisciplinary collaboration enhances their effectiveness in college and university settings.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Rate the extent to which the session enabled you to integrate protective psychological constructs—particularly hope, social connectedness, and belonging—into outreach and prevention initiatives to buffer known suicide risk factors and strengthen campus cultures of care.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section B: Content Quality and Relevance
The content of the session was relevant to my field of interest.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The content of the session demonstrated evidence-based resources.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section C: Presenter Effectiveness
The presenter demonstrated expertise in the topic(s) discussed.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter was clear and effective in delivering the content of the session.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter engaged the audience well during the session.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section D: Overall Evaluation
Instructional level was appropriate

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall satisfaction with the session

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Very Unsatisfied, 5 is Very Satisfied
I would recommend this session to colleagues

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section E: Open-Ended Feedback
Most valuable aspect / takeaway
Suggestions for improvement
Future topics of interest
Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification
Participant Name

First NameLast Name
Email Address
example@example.com
License Type
License Number
Confirmation of Attendance
Signature
Attendance Date

MonthDayYear
Date
Should be Empty:

Beyond One-Size-Fits-All: A Layered Approach to Campus Suicide Prevention Session Evaluation

Session Details

Section A: Learning Objective Achievement

Section B: Content Quality and Relevance

Section C: Presenter Effectiveness

Section D: Overall Evaluation

Section E: Open-Ended Feedback

Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification