Session Evaluation: Got Embedded?

Got Embedded? An Interactive Panel and Discussion with New and Established Embedded Professionals and Programming Takeaways for All Session Evaluation

Post-session evaluation for CE activities. Complete all ratings using the 1–5 scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
Session Details
Session Title
Date

MonthDayYear
Date
Presenter(s)
Section A: Learning Objective Achievement

As a participant, please respond to the below with how accurately you are able to implement the learning objectives.
Attendees will be able to define an embedded therapist and program.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Attendees will be able to list at least three benefits of embedded therapists and programs to the college/university.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Attendees will be able to list at least three considerations or implementation barriers to avoid when starting an embedded program.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Attendees will be able to write down one idea they gained from the presentation that they can adapt to the embedded or outreach mission of their campus, with attention to contextual/cultural factors.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section B: Content Quality and Relevance
The content of the session was relevant to my field of interest.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The content of the session demonstrated evidence-based resources.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section C: Presenter Effectiveness
The presenter demonstrated expertise in the topic(s) discussed.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter was clear and effective in delivering the content of the session.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter engaged the audience well during the session.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section D: Overall Evaluation
Instructional level was appropriate

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall satisfaction with the session

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Very Unsatisfied, 5 is Very Satisfied
I would recommend this session to colleagues

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section E: Open-Ended Feedback
Most valuable aspect / takeaway
Suggestions for improvement
Future topics of interest
Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification
Participant Name

First NameLast Name
Email Address
example@example.com
License Type
License Number
Confirmation of Attendance
Signature
Attendance Date

MonthDayYear
Date
Should be Empty:

Got Embedded? An Interactive Panel and Discussion with New and Established Embedded Professionals and Programming Takeaways for All Session Evaluation

Session Details

Section A: Learning Objective Achievement

Section B: Content Quality and Relevance

Section C: Presenter Effectiveness

Section D: Overall Evaluation

Section E: Open-Ended Feedback

Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification