Session Evaluation: Leveraging Health Promotion Partnerships for Campus Well-Being

Leveraging Health Promotion Partnerships for Campus Well-Being Session Evaluation

Post-session evaluation for CE activities. Complete all ratings using the 1–5 scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
Session Details
Session Title
Date

MonthDayYear
Date
Presenter(s)
Section A: Learning Objective Achievement

As a participant, please respond to the below with how accurately you are able to implement the learning objectives.
Describe the value of collaboration between counseling centers and health promotion partners in supporting student well-being

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Identify differences in approaches and philosophies between counseling centers and health promotion departments, and strategies to bridge them or address common barriers to collaboration

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Apply tangible strategies for building strong, reciprocal relationships and co-facilitated initiatives

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Participants will learn strategies for advocating for, and continuing to encourage, mental health education outreach services in partnership with other campus departments

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section B: Content Quality and Relevance
The content of the session was relevant to my field of interest.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The content of the session demonstrated evidence-based resources.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section C: Presenter Effectiveness
The presenter demonstrated expertise in the topic(s) discussed.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter was clear and effective in delivering the content of the session.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter engaged the audience well during the session.

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section D: Overall Evaluation
Instructional level was appropriate

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall satisfaction with the session

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Very Unsatisfied, 5 is Very Satisfied
I would recommend this session to colleagues

1

2

3

4

5

1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section E: Open-Ended Feedback
Most valuable aspect / takeaway
Suggestions for improvement
Future topics of interest
Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification
Participant Name

First NameLast Name
Email Address
example@example.com
License Type
License Number
Confirmation of Attendance
Signature
Attendance Date

MonthDayYear
Date
Should be Empty:

Leveraging Health Promotion Partnerships for Campus Well-Being Session Evaluation

Session Details

Section A: Learning Objective Achievement

Section B: Content Quality and Relevance

Section C: Presenter Effectiveness

Section D: Overall Evaluation

Section E: Open-Ended Feedback

Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification