Ahead of the Game: How the founding of AUCCCO helped prepare outreach pros to own the main stage in the current college mental health climate
Post-session evaluation for CE activities. Complete all ratings using the 1–5 scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 5 = Strongly Agree.
Session Details
Session Title
*
Date
*
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Presenter(s)
*
Section A: Learning Objective Achievement
As a participant, please respond to the below with how accurately you are able to implement the learning objectives.
Describe the historical development of AUCCCO and its role in shaping the mission, values, and scope of college counseling center outreach since 2008.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Analyze how systems-level outreach and multi-tiered service delivery models have expanded the role of college counseling centers in addressing student mental health needs and campus climate pressures.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Identify ways outreach competencies from college counseling settings are being applied in other professional environments, including non-academic fields such as professional sports.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section B: Content Quality and Relevance
The content of the session was relevant to my field of interest.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The content of the session demonstrated evidence-based resources.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section C: Presenter Effectiveness
The presenter demonstrated expertise in the topic(s) discussed.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter was clear and effective in delivering the content of the session.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
The presenter engaged the audience well during the session.
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section D: Overall Evaluation
Instructional level was appropriate
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Overall satisfaction with the session
*
Very Unsatisfied
1
2
3
4
Very Satisfied
5
1 is Very Unsatisfied, 5 is Very Satisfied
I would recommend this session to colleagues
*
Strongly Disagree
1
2
3
4
Strongly Agree
5
1 is Strongly Disagree, 5 is Strongly Agree
Section E: Open-Ended Feedback
Most valuable aspect / takeaway
Suggestions for improvement
Future topics of interest
Section F: Participant Information and Attendance Verification
Participant Name
*
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
*
example@example.com
License Type
License Number
Confirmation of Attendance
*
I confirm I attended the session
Signature
*
Attendance Date
*
-
Month
-
Day
Year
Date
Submit Evaluation
Submit Evaluation
Should be Empty: