Accessible Holiday Park of the Year — Entry Form
Complete all required entry details, scored responses, and supporting evidence, then submit when ready.
Entry details
Holiday park name
*
Parent company or group (if applicable)
Full address and postcode
*
Street Address
Street Address Line 2
City
State / Province
Postal / Zip Code
Please Select
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
The Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curaçao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Polynesia
Gabon
The Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
North Korea
South Korea
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nagorno-Karabakh
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
Northern Mariana
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn Islands
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of the Congo
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Barthelemy
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
Somaliland
South Africa
South Ossetia
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard
eSwatini
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Transnistria Pridnestrovie
Trinidad and Tobago
Tristan da Cunha
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Vietnam
British Virgin Islands
Isle of Man
US Virgin Islands
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Other
Country
Website / booking URL
*
Primary contact name
*
First Name
Last Name
Primary contact job title
*
Primary contact email
*
example@example.com
Primary contact telephone number
*
-
Area Code
Phone Number
Ownership / operating model
*
Please Select
Privately owned
Family-owned
Part of a larger group
Management company-operated
Leased operation
Publicly owned
Other
Park profile
*
Accessibility changes during the eligibility period
Eligibility confirmation
*
I confirm the entry meets the eligibility requirements
I confirm the information provided is accurate and complete
I confirm the park was operating during the eligibility period
Conflicts of interest
Online presence and review profiles
Facebook URL
Instagram URL
LinkedIn URL
TikTok URL
YouTube URL
X/Twitter URL
TripAdvisor URL
Google Reviews URL
Feefo or Trustpilot URL
Other review site URL
Scored entry — 100 points
Question 1: Inclusive strategy, leadership and lived experience — 20 points — maximum 500 words
*
Explain how accessibility and inclusion are embedded in the park’s strategy, leadership and decision-making. Please include: • Describe the park’s accessibility aims, responsibilities, policies and priorities, including how progress is reviewed. • Show how disabled guests, families, carers, staff or specialist organisations have informed decisions through consultation, co-design or feedback. • Give a specific example of lived experience changing a policy, service, facility or investment decision. Judges will look for: Clear leadership and accountability; meaningful involvement of disabled people; accessibility embedded in decisions; evidence that insight leads to action.
0/500
Question 2: Accessible accommodation, facilities and environment — 25 points — maximum 500 words
*
Demonstrate how the physical environment, accommodation and facilities provide safe, dignified and practical access while preserving guest choice and enjoyment. Please include: • Cover arrival, parking, routes, gradients, surfaces, signage, reception, accommodation, bathrooms, leisure facilities, food and beverage areas and outdoor spaces as relevant. • Explain how adapted or accessible provision supports independence, dignity, companions and carers without unnecessary segregation. • Identify recent improvements, maintenance arrangements and how the park communicates any limitations accurately. Judges will look for: Safe and dignified access; genuine choice; thoughtful detail; well-maintained provision; accurate acknowledgement of limitations; benefits across the whole stay.
0/500
Question 3: Information, booking and communication — 20 points — maximum 500 words
*
Show how guests can find, understand and trust the accessibility information they need before booking and throughout their stay. Please include: • Cover website and booking information, access guides, measurements, photographs, descriptions, availability and direct contact routes. • Explain communication provision such as alternative formats, captions, hearing support, visual information, plain language or sensory information as relevant. • Give an example of preventing or resolving a booking problem caused by incomplete, inaccurate or inaccessible information. Judges will look for: Detailed and trustworthy information; accessible communication; clear booking processes; confident pre-arrival support; fewer avoidable surprises.
0/500
Question 4: Service, staff confidence and inclusive experience — 20 points — maximum 500 words
*
Explain how the park team delivers a welcoming, flexible and respectful experience for guests with different access needs. Please include: • Describe staff training, responsibilities, confidence, language and processes for recording and acting on individual requirements. • Show how activities, entertainment, food and beverage, leisure, evacuation and emergency arrangements are made inclusive as relevant. • Give a specific example of a reasonable adjustment, service recovery or thoughtful response that improved a guest’s stay. Judges will look for: Respectful and confident service; practical flexibility; inclusive activities and facilities; suitable safety arrangements; strong examples of individual support.
0/500
Question 5: Outcomes, evidence and continuous improvement — 15 points — maximum 500 words
*
Bring the case together: what measurable difference has the park’s accessibility work made and how will it continue to improve? Please include: • Provide relevant results such as accessible bookings, satisfaction, feedback themes, repeat visits, recommendations, complaints resolved, staff confidence or independent recognition, compared with a baseline or target. • Explain the most important improvement during the eligibility period, what evidence shows it worked and any remaining gaps. • Set out clear and realistic accessibility priorities for the next 12 to 24 months. Judges will look for: Credible outcomes; guest voice; transparent evidence; honest identification of gaps; sustained improvement and realistic future commitments.
0/500
Tie-breaker — only used if required
This section is used only if entries remain tied after moderation.
What single accessibility improvement has made the greatest difference to a guest’s freedom, dignity or enjoyment? — tie-break only — maximum 250 words
*
In no more than 250 words, describe one specific improvement or response, explain the difference it made to a guest or group of guests, and provide the evidence that proves its impact. This answer is outside the 100-point total and is considered only when entries remain tied after moderation.
0/250
Supporting evidence
Supporting evidence files
*
Upload a File
Drag and drop files here
Choose a file
Cancel
of
Evidence notes / index
Declaration
Entrant name
*
First Name
Last Name
Job title
*
Date
*
-
Month
-
Day
Year
2 digit month, 2 digit day, 4 digit year
Date
I agree to the declaration above
*
I agree to the declaration above
Submit Accessible Holiday Park entry
Should be Empty: