CPRA Mississippi River Mid-Basin Sediment Diversion Program: Market Sounding
Company Information
Company name
*
Respondent's name
*
E-mail
*
Phone Number
*
-
Area Code
Phone Number
Company address
Street Address
Street Address Line 2
City
State / Province
Postal / Zip Code
Please Select
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
The Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Curaçao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Polynesia
Gabon
The Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
North Korea
South Korea
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Nagorno-Karabakh
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus
Northern Mariana
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn Islands
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of the Congo
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
Saint Barthelemy
Saint Helena
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Pierre and Miquelon
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome and Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
Somaliland
South Africa
South Ossetia
South Sudan
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Suriname
Svalbard
eSwatini
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Transnistria Pridnestrovie
Trinidad and Tobago
Tristan da Cunha
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks and Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
United States
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City
Venezuela
Vietnam
British Virgin Islands
Isle of Man
US Virgin Islands
Wallis and Futuna
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Other
Country
Company Background
Based on the information provided on CPRA's website, for a project such as this, in which of the following areas would you be interested in participating? (Check as many as apply)
Design
Construction management
Construction (self performance)
Materials supplier
Equipment vendor
Operations
Other
In what capacity has your past involvement on similar coastal infrastructure projects been?
Design
Construction management
Construction (self performance)
Materials supplier
Equipment vendor
Operations
No previous involement
Other
If yes, BRIEFLY describe the project(s) and any best practices/lessons learned.
Have you previously participated in any of the following coastal infrastructure projects? (Check as many as apply)
Construction Management at Risk (CMAR)
Progressive Design-Build (PDB)
Fixed price design build
Operator
No previous participation
Other
If yes, what was your company's role?
Designer
General contractor
Subcontractor
Materials supplier
Equipment vendor
Operator
Construction management
Other
Procurement and delivery model
Do you have a preference between CMAR and PDB?
CMAR
PDB
No preference
Why do you have this preference?
Given the inherent differences in each method's contract model, risk profile, and potential for design-construction collaboration and innovation, what is your view on the best type of project or circumstance to use one method over the other?
Preconstruction services (design, constructability, estimating, etc.) are often priced on a lump-sum or not-to-exceed basis. What's your view of this approach?
What is your suggested method to quantify and price preconstruction scope for CMAR and PDB?
For CMAR or PDB, it's assumed that the construction cost will be developed on an open-book, transparent basis. What is your view of this approach?
For CMAR or PDB, a self-performance by a General Contractor may or may not be in CPRA's interest. If applicable, would you prefer the opportunity to self-perform construction scope?
Yes, I'd prefer the opportunity to self-perform the construction scope
No, I do not prefer the opportunity to self-perform the construction scope
No preference
Should the amount of self-performed construction be limited or required to a certain percentage of work?
Self performance should be limited
Self performance should be required
No opinion on self performance
Interest and Capacity
What are the primary factors that would affect your interest in pursuing this project?
Do you consider the project to be an attractive opportunity?
Yes
No
No opinion
What factors will influence your decision to participate in this project?
Discuss what you believe are the unique requirements and challenges of this project.
What critical issues need to be addressed for the success of this project? How do you think CPRA should address them?
Considering your answer above, what is your preference for packaging a project of this size?
Fewer, larger projects
More numerous, smaller projects
No preference
Assuming CPRA applies an industry-standard approach to surety payment and performance bonding requirements, is this project too small or large from your perspective, assuming a single-project capital budget of between $700 M to $1.3 B?
Acceptable size
Too large
Too small
No opinion
What is the largest size project your firm is capable of bonding?
Less than $100 Million
$100-299 Million
$300-499 Million
$500-699 Million
$700-900 Million
Greater than $900 Million
Are you more likely to pursue this project alone or as part of a team?
Alone
As part of a team
If as a team, would you likely be the leader or a subcontractor/ subconsultant?
Prime/ team leader
Subcontractor/ subconsultant
Given the unique nature of a Mississippi River diversion project, do you see any specific challenges in teaming and providing the required scope?
Do you foresee any issues with fulfilling any component of the project based on capacity and interest of firms that you would look to team with?
Are there other projects in the coastal infrastructure market will you be considering in the same timeframe that would be competing for resources and what is the impact on your ability / interest to participate in this project?
Are there any other issues that might be critical to your participation in this project that you can foresee?
Project Delivery Method
How would separate design and construction procurements using a Construction Management at risk (CMAR) impact your interest and teaming strategy for the project?
Decrease
About same
Increase
Significantly increase
Other
How would the inclusion of the design and construction scope in a single design-build procurement impact your interest and teaming strategy for the project?
Decrease
About same
Increase
Significantly increase
Other
How would the inclusion of operations and maintenance scope in either a CMAR or design-build approach impact your interest and teaming strategy for the project?
Decrease
About same
Increase
Significantly increase
Other
Project Risk Allocation
Based on your experience on similar projects, can you identify any risks that have been particularly difficult for you to manage in previous coastal infrastructure projects that CPRA should be certain to retain? Why?
Based on your experience on similar projects, can you identify any risks that have been particularly difficult for you to manage in previous coastal infrastructure projects that CPRA should be certain to retain? Select all that apply.
Geotechnical/ subsurface conditions
Land acquisition
Environmental permitting
Administrative permitting/ local approvals
Utility conflicts
Railroad coordination
Other
Would the private sector be willing to take on any of the permitting and approvals risk for this project?
Yes
No
Not sure
Design and Construction
The anticipated construction window, after various permitting approvals are complete, is 48 to 60 months. What are your views on the adequacy of this schedule?
Too slow
About right
Too long
Other
What is your view on the phasing of construction activities for a project such as this one? Does it make more sense to construct all components concurrently or is there a natural phasing of the components that can occur while still achieving the construction schedule?
Are there efficiencies or inefficiencies with procuring this project as single design and CMAR contracts?
Efficiencies
Inefficiencies
Are there efficiencies or inefficiencies with procuring this project as a single design build contract?
A single contract is more efficient
A single contract is less efficient
No opinion
Are there any components of the project that you would prefer to be excluded from the scope and procured separately?
Based on the provided summary, do you think there is potential for innovation in the design and construction of this project?
There's potential for innovation
There's not much potential for innovation
No opinion
Do you have any suggestions that would allow designers or contractors to add value through innovation to reduce costs and increase efficiency for the project?
Summary Questions
Based on the project's information,how likely is it that you would participate in this project?
Highly unlikely
Unlikely
Could happen
Likely
Highly likely
Not sure
What are the factors that will influence your decision to participate?
What do you see as some of the key opportunities or challenges in delivering the project as defined?
What other factors could make this project more or less appealing to the design and construction industry?
Is there any other information you would like to share in relation to this project?
Submit
Should be Empty: