Doctoral Student Progress Evaluation (SPE)

Student*

First NameLast Name

Student Email*

Select your Faculty Email by scrolling through the alphabetical dropdown list below. Be sure to scroll through the entire list first to locate your faculty (if your faculty's name is not listed, (if your faculty's name is not listed, please type in the email adress in the next field)

Faculty Email

If Faculty Email is not listed above you may enter the email address here. Be sure you've entered the correct spelling and if applicable digits of their email address.

example@example.com

Please take a moment and rate your progress to this point in the doctoral specialization courses. You are not rating your performance in this course, rather, you are rating your progress so far on the items listed below related to the doctoral specialization courses portion of the program.

Fundamental Academic Skills Evaluation Ratings (complete only the rating corresponding to your role - student or faculty) 1 = Below Expectations 2 = Working Toward Expectations 3 = Meets Expectations

	COMPLETED BY STUDENT Student Rating 1, 2 or 3	COMPLETED BY FACULTY Faculty Rating 1, 2 or 3
1. The student’s work evidenced commitment to scholarship (growth, learning, reading the scholarly MFT literature, owning the material).
2. Student demonstrated an ability to write effectively at the graduate level (clearly and persuasively, using active voice, proper grammar, and organization).
3. Student demonstrated an understanding of the importance of following the APA guidelines by using them consistently in assignments.
4. Student demonstrated an ability to effectively manage her or his time to accomplish all tasks required in the course.

Specific Key Skills Evaluation Ratings (complete only the rating corresponding to your role - student or faculty) 1 = Below Expectations 2 = Working Toward Expectations 3 = Meets Expectations N/R = Not relevant to this course

	COMPLETED BY STUDENT Student Rating 1, 2 or 3	COMPLETED BY FACULTY Faculty Rating 1, 2 or 3
5. The student demonstrated the ability to synthesize literature to support statements made in course assignments.
6. The student demonstrated the ability to modify and improve his or her research proposal.
7. The student was able describe, propose, and justify the application of various research designs.
8. The student was able describe, propose, and justify the application of various research methods.
9. The student demonstrated the ability to conduct and evaluate different statistical analyses.

Overall Paradigms & Perspectives Evaluation Ratings (complete only the rating corresponding to your role - student or faculty) 1 = Below Expectations 2 = Working Toward Expectations 3 = Meets Expectations

	COMPLETED BY STUDENT Student Rating 1, 2 or 3	COMPLETED BY FACULTY Faculty Rating 1, 2 or 3
10. The student demonstrates understanding of ethical concepts in MFT and how they apply to her or him as a MFT trainee.
11. The student demonstrates understanding of and appreciation and respect for cultural and other diversity factors, as well as the ability to articulate how these concepts apply to her or him as a MFT trainee.

Student Rating Overall Total

Faculty Rating Overall Total

STUDENT Overall Comments (explanations for any of the above ratings)

STUDENT Please share your feedback about the course (e.g. thoughts on content, resources, quizzes, and assignments). You can also share your thoughts by reaching out to the Academic Program Director. ssbs@nu.edu.

FACULTY Overall Comments (explanations for any of the above ratings)

Doctoral Student Progress Evaluation (SPE) - Specializations