Doctoral Student Progress Evaluation MFT-7102 (SPE)

Student*

First NameLast Name

Student Email*

Select your Faculty Email by scrolling through the alphabetical dropdown list below. Be sure to scroll through the entire list first to locate your faculty (if your faculty's name is not listed, (if your faculty's name is not listed, please type in the email adress in the next field)

Faculty Email

If Faculty Email is not listed above you may enter the email address here. Be sure you've entered the correct spelling and if applicable digits of their email address.

example@example.com

Please take a moment and rate your progress to this point in the doctoral foundations courses process. You are not rating your performance in this course, rather, you are rating your progress so far on the items listed below related to the foundations courses (first three courses) portion of the program.

Course*

Rating - Proficiency Scale - Complete only the rating corresponding to your role - student or faculty)

1= Emerging – the student is beginning to demonstrate basic knowledge/skills
in relation to the standards
2 = Developing – the student demonstrated some knowledge / skills in relation to the standards
3 = Proficient – the student demonstrated good knowledge/ skills in relation to the standards
4 = Extending – the student demonstrated knowledge beyond the standards

Fundamental Academic Skills

	COMPLETED BY STUDENT Student Rating 1,2,3,4	COMPLETED BY FACULTY Faculty Rating 1,2,3,4
1.The student successfully made the transition to doctoral level work, taking ownership for their growth and learning, and reaching out for guidance as needed.
2.The student comprehended feedback and implemented it from one assignment to the next.
3. The student demonstrated respect and professionalism in interactions with faculty, other students, and staff.
4.The student’s work evidenced commitment to scholarship (growth, learning, reading the scholarly MFT literature, owning the material).
5. Student demonstrated understanding that writing is an iterative process.
6. Student demonstrated a growth mindset in that their behavior in the course reflected an openness to feedback and a commitment to developing their scholarly abilities.

Rating - Proficiency Scale - Complete only the rating corresponding to your role - student or faculty)

1= Emerging – the student is beginning to demonstrate basic knowledge/skills
in relation to the standards
2 = Developing – the student demonstrated some knowledge / skills in relation to the standards
3 = Proficient – the student demonstrated good knowledge/ skills in relation to the standards
4 = Extending – the student demonstrated knowledge beyond the standards

Specific Key Skills

	COMPLETED BY STUDENT Student Rating 1,2,3,4	COMPLETED BY FACULTY Faculty Rating 1,2,3,4
7.The student demonstrated a willingness to utilize library and academic support resources to support the development of their scholarly abilities.
8.The student demonstrated an ability to effectively manage their time to accomplish all tasks required in the course.
9.The student demonstrated the ability to effectively structure assignments and write with clarity and coherence.
10.The student demonstrated the ability to use active voice and scholarly language in their writing.
11.The student demonstrated the ability to locate relevant literature pertinent to course assignments.
12.The student demonstrated the ability to differentiate between scholarly sources and those sources typically not appropriate for scholarly writing (e.g., blogs, online dictionaries, Wikis).
13.The student demonstrated the ability to differentiate between research study results and other scholarly material such as literature reviews, clinical pieces, or theoretical articles.
14.The student evidenced the ability to critique scholarly literature, and not accept all findings as equally valid.
15.The student demonstrated the ability to organize and synthesize literature in a coherent manner.
16.The student demonstrated the ability to identify gaps in the literature, and articulate possible research studies to address those gaps.

Rating - Proficiency Scale - Complete only the rating corresponding to your role - student or faculty)

1= Emerging – the student is beginning to demonstrate basic knowledge/skills
in relation to the standards
2 = Developing – the student demonstrated some knowledge / skills in relation to the standards
3 = Proficient – the student demonstrated good knowledge/ skills in relation to the standards
4 = Extending – the student demonstrated knowledge beyond the standards

Overall Paradigms & Perspectives

	COMPLETED BY STUDENT Student Rating 1,2,3,4	COMPLETED BY FACULTY Faculty Rating 1,2,3,4
17. The student demonstrated an understanding of the key elements of relational/systemic research.
18.The student demonstrated an understanding of the characteristics and value of ethical research.
19.The student demonstrated the ability to evaluate the samples employed in published studies for biases and limitations on generalizability.
20.The student demonstrated understanding of and appreciation and respect for culture, diversity, equity, inclusion, and social justice in research.
21.The student evidenced an understanding of the importance of following the APA guidelines by striving to use them consistently in assignments.

Student Rating Overall Total

Faculty Rating Overall Total

STUDENT Overall Comments (explanations for any of the above ratings)

STUDENT Please share your feedback about the course (e.g. thoughts on content, resources, quizzes, and assignments). You can also share your thoughts by reaching out to the Academic Program Director, ssbs@nu.edu

FACULTY Overall Comments (explanations for any of the above ratings)