Instructions: Refer back to the prior year's Planned Modifications that specifically focused on improving the program outcome. Provide last year’s results for the threshold, describe the improvement implemented, and then provide the results for this year’s threshold. For analysis, discuss the impact of the modification on the outcome results.
Example:
In 2016-17, 70% of student leaders identified key components of planning, conducting, and executing a meeting, which was below the threshold of 75%. Goal unmet.
In 2017-18, student leaders kept a journal of plans, ideas, and reflections on each student meeting they conducted.
(For analysis): The journal created a space for student leaders to capture their own ideas about what worked and did not work as they conducted meetings with other students. The journal seemed improve the quality of discussions at SGA Leadership meetings. At the end of the year, student leaders rated thier satisfaction with the journal as "valuable" or "very valuable."
In 2017-18, 80% of student leaders identified key components of planning, conducting, and executing a meeting, which was above the threshold of 75%. Goal met.